State strikes deal on discriminatory fire, police exams - New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard
Men's Apparel Jerseys Hats Novelties Throwback Women's Youth
 
REGISTER FOR PATSFANS.COM

Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!


Go Back   New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard > Off Topic Forums > Political Discussion
Forgot Password? Join PatsFans.com!
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Arcade Mark Forums Read Chat Room

WELCOME TO OUR FORUM HERE AT PATSFANS.COM!
ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW

Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-31-2007, 02:27 PM   #1
Hall of Fame Poster
 
Real World's Avatar
 

Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Boston
Posts: 25,134
My Mood: Yeehaw
Default State strikes deal on discriminatory fire, police exams

Can anyone explain to me what was discriminatory about the previous tests? I'm not sure I'm following this properly.


State strikes deal on fire, police exams
Calls for more minority hires

By Shelley Murphy, Globe Staff | May 31, 2007

The state has agreed to settle a class-action lawsuit by requiring Boston, Brookline, and 18 other cities and towns to offer police and firefighter jobs to minority applicants who took civil service exams that a judge later found were discriminatory. The state would also pay a total of up to $1.45 million in back pay.

The agreement, which will be presented to a federal judge for approval Wednesday, calls for the hiring of 66 minority candidates statewide, including 26 in Boston, who scored high on police or fire exams between 2002 and 2005, but lost out to higher-scoring white candidates.

A federal judge ruled last summer that the state's 2002 and 2004 firefighter exams discriminated against blacks and Hispanics and was about to hold a trial to consider additional claims resulting from arguments that the 2003 and 2005 police exams were also unfair to members of minority groups.

Harold L. Lichten, a lawyer who filed the class-action suit against the state and the city of Lynn on behalf of four black firefighter applicants, said they agreed to settle because the state came up with a new "state of the art" exam last year that appears to be much fairer to minorities.

http://www.boston.com/news/local/mas..._police_exams/
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


"The most difficult subjects can be explained to the most slow-witted man if he has not formed any idea of them already; but the simplest thing cannot be made clear to the most intelligent man if he is firmly persuaded that he knows already, without a shadow of doubt, what is laid before him."
Leo Tolstoy, 1897
Real World is offline   Reply With Quote
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!

Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account
including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.

NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98

Updated 07/08/11

Help Us Reach Our Goal!

Old 05-31-2007, 04:23 PM   #2
Look Up, It's Amazing
 
Harry Boy's Avatar
 

Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 33,798
Default Re: State strikes deal on discriminatory fire, police exams

I think I'll stay out of this one for awhile, if I give you my take on this they will close the thread.
__________________
Harry Boy (Genius)

In The Absence Of Law And Order Society Will Surely Destroy Itself
Harry Boy is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2007, 04:38 PM   #3
Moderator
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 16,335
My Mood: Mellow
Default Re: State strikes deal on discriminatory fire, police exams

Quote:
Originally Posted by Real World View Post
Can anyone explain to me what was discriminatory about the previous tests? I'm not sure I'm following this properly.
I don't know. I just did a search on the internet and couldn't find more info. But as the article said, the applicants all had very high scores and the test has some bias. For instance, I am surprised the test didn't take into account strength. That would seem relevant. I'm also surprised that it had some questions that had nothing to do with firefighting. With a long and well-established history of discrimination in MA fire and police departments, is it any surprise that some would believe the tests are weighted unfairly?

At any rate, are tests scores really the only metric used to hire police and firefighters in MA. If so, that seems insane. Would you ever hire someone based solely on a test? There needs to be some subjectivity to the process, though I'm not sure if this suit addressed that at all.
Patters is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2007, 04:39 PM   #4
Moderator
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 16,335
My Mood: Mellow
Default Re: State strikes deal on discriminatory fire, police exams

Quote:
Originally Posted by Harry Boy View Post
I think I'll stay out of this one for awhile, if I give you my take on this they will close the thread.
Smart move, Harry. Besides, I'm sure we already know what you think, and RW might very well present your point of view in a more politically correct manner.
Patters is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2007, 05:20 PM   #5
Hall of Fame Poster
 
Real World's Avatar
 

Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Boston
Posts: 25,134
My Mood: Yeehaw
Default Re: State strikes deal on discriminatory fire, police exams

Quote:
Originally Posted by Patters View Post
I don't know. I just did a search on the internet and couldn't find more info. But as the article said, the applicants all had very high scores and the test has some bias. For instance, I am surprised the test didn't take into account strength. That would seem relevant. I'm also surprised that it had some questions that had nothing to do with firefighting. With a long and well-established history of discrimination in MA fire and police departments, is it any surprise that some would believe the tests are weighted unfairly?

At any rate, are tests scores really the only metric used to hire police and firefighters in MA. If so, that seems insane. Would you ever hire someone based solely on a test? There needs to be some subjectivity to the process, though I'm not sure if this suit addressed that at all.
I looked and couldn't find anything. What made me question the exams is that the article said it was discriminatory towards minorites. What kind of questions would be to them, and not to whites?

The physical aspect was a little baffling too. You'd think they'd want people who could handle a hose, or chase down a thug. Maybe that was deemed discriminatory? I dunno.
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


"The most difficult subjects can be explained to the most slow-witted man if he has not formed any idea of them already; but the simplest thing cannot be made clear to the most intelligent man if he is firmly persuaded that he knows already, without a shadow of doubt, what is laid before him."
Leo Tolstoy, 1897
Real World is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2007, 05:21 PM   #6
Hall of Fame Poster
 
Real World's Avatar
 

Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Boston
Posts: 25,134
My Mood: Yeehaw
Default Re: State strikes deal on discriminatory fire, police exams

Quote:
Originally Posted by Patters View Post
Smart move, Harry. Besides, I'm sure we already know what you think, and RW might very well present your point of view in a more politically correct manner.
Harry is a little more to the point than most.
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


"The most difficult subjects can be explained to the most slow-witted man if he has not formed any idea of them already; but the simplest thing cannot be made clear to the most intelligent man if he is firmly persuaded that he knows already, without a shadow of doubt, what is laid before him."
Leo Tolstoy, 1897
Real World is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2007, 06:01 PM   #7
Experienced Starter w/First Big Contract
 

Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Brighton, MA
Posts: 5,742
Default Re: State strikes deal on discriminatory fire, police exams

The back pay part pisses me off. The roofer guy wasn't unemployed because of this test being unfair, he was roofing during that time. If he lost some seniority status give him a bump with respect to that, but he doesn't deserve back pay.

Oh and won't the whole 'strength' thing just get women filing lawsuits? Damn, I should have been a lawyer
sdaniels7114 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-01-2007, 10:48 AM   #8
Third String But Playing on Special Teams
 

Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: North Shore, MA
Posts: 539
Default Re: State strikes deal on discriminatory fire, police exams

This is strictly based upon what was reported in today's Lynn Item in regards to the problems with the exam. The test included questions not related to the job being tested for. In addition the exam tested cognitive abilities which was considered dscriminatory toward minorities. The Item reported that the settlement was based upon minority complaints that the civil service exam questions and writing sections were "too hard". The plaintiffs also complained that beyond the test the state did not take into account applicants' personalities and life experiences. Make your own conclusions from here.
__________________
The 9 most dangerous words in the English language are: I am from the government and I can help. Ronald Reagan
taltos is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-01-2007, 12:39 PM   #9
Hall of Fame Poster
 
Real World's Avatar
 

Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Boston
Posts: 25,134
My Mood: Yeehaw
Default Re: State strikes deal on discriminatory fire, police exams

Quote:
Originally Posted by taltos View Post
This is strictly based upon what was reported in today's Lynn Item in regards to the problems with the exam. The test included questions not related to the job being tested for. In addition the exam tested cognitive abilities which was considered dscriminatory toward minorities. The Item reported that the settlement was based upon minority complaints that the civil service exam questions and writing sections were "too hard". The plaintiffs also complained that beyond the test the state did not take into account applicants' personalities and life experiences. Make your own conclusions from here.
I know what the article said, but what it didn't say, is what was discriminatory about the previous test. If minorities thought the questions were too hard, that's complete BS. What are they saying then, that minorities are dumber than white people? That's utterly ridiculous.
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


"The most difficult subjects can be explained to the most slow-witted man if he has not formed any idea of them already; but the simplest thing cannot be made clear to the most intelligent man if he is firmly persuaded that he knows already, without a shadow of doubt, what is laid before him."
Leo Tolstoy, 1897
Real World is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-01-2007, 01:30 PM   #10
Look Up, It's Amazing
 
Harry Boy's Avatar
 

Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 33,798
Default Re: State strikes deal on discriminatory fire, police exams

Quote:
Originally Posted by Patters View Post
Smart move, Harry. Besides, I'm sure we already know what you think, and RW might very well present your point of view in a more politically correct manner.
Could it be the "Veteran Thing" and also could they want the Standards lowered.

My son is Mass Firefighter and retiring next month with a Captains Rank which means a very good pension, he has 32 yrs service, he has told me that the Veteran thing is a must now and also that most all of the new people coming on the job are College Grads, the benefits, the 24 hr shifts (five days off) the sick pay, the vacation time, the job security, the overtime, the pension plan and the pay scale has made "firefighting" a very attractive career.

They are probably claiming that the tests are discriminatory because some folks aren't veterans and some folks FLUNK the tests, that might be the answer because so many College People are going "on the job".

Jesus H Christ I hope I didn't offend anybody.
__________________
Harry Boy (Genius)

In The Absence Of Law And Order Society Will Surely Destroy Itself
Harry Boy is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Sponsored Links



Thread Tools
Display Modes


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:44 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2

© Copyright 2000-2012. PatsFans.com Is a Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties.
The opinions posted in this forum do not necessarily reflect the opinions of our staff at PatsFans.com or USA Today.
We are not affiliated with the New England Patriots™ or the NFL™. The Photo Used In the header was taken by Ian Logue.

This site is owned and operated by I&K Internet Design Enterprises, LLC


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563