GOP pressured US Attorneys to help win 2006 election - Page 3 - New England Patriots Forums

Fogbuster · 05-20-2007, 01:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PressCoverage

don't lie about your choice of who's in office... you're constantly defending him, he's your hero...

and don't lie that my position on Boy King is isolated... most people are of the same opinion, and none of your spin will change that... this year alone, i've yet to meet more than a handful of people who aren't disgusted with Bush... they flock to blog sites, however, so i enjoy meeting people like you head-on...

as for happiness... if you're happy lying about the world, and lying to yourself, than more power to you... i just won $1,100 for 6th last night on PokerStars, so I'm happier than my usual happy... don't make a further fool of yourself by declaring you know me or my private life, jaggie...

What's to lie. Even with all his warts I'd take Bush over Kerry. Or Gore, 1000 days out of a 1000. Doesn't mean Bush never makes any mistakes. There's no doubt in my mind that if either Gore or Kerry were in charge we'd all be very busy learning Arabic and Sharia law. On the job training, no less.

Your non-stop attempts to spin everything into YOUR tin-foil world of vengeance are truly tiresome. Disagreeing with Bush doesn't mean people are flocking to the Dems (much less the Greens). You've got your hard-core constituency, sure, but most people still want to give Bush a break, help him to get things right.

Call back when you have something insightful to say, something besides your James Carville/Paul Begala routine.

//

***PressCoverage*** · 05-20-2007, 03:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fogbuster

What's to lie. Even with all his warts I'd take Bush over Kerry. Or Gore, 1000 days out of a 1000. Doesn't mean Bush never makes any mistakes. There's no doubt in my mind that if either Gore or Kerry were in charge we'd all be very busy learning Arabic and Sharia law. On the job training, no less.

Your non-stop attempts to spin everything into YOUR tin-foil world of vengeance are truly tiresome. Disagreeing with Bush doesn't mean people are flocking to the Dems (much less the Greens). You've got your hard-core constituency, sure, but most people still want to give Bush a break, help him to get things right.

Call back when you have something insightful to say, something besides your James Carville/Paul Begala routine.

//

Fog? Pick up!! ... pc calling... with something insightful to say... just like last time,and the time before that....

most wanna help George "get things right???" wow... newsflash: he fauks everything he touches up... yale, air natonal guard, arbusto, harken stock, the Rangers, 'my pet goat,' Medicare Part D, greeting a female german diplomat, plame, the border, iraq's borders... shall i continue?... he's a bad businessman, a stock purger, a greedy capitalist... this man was convinced occupying a nation of 25 million people was a good idea... wait, let me say that again, ... George W. Bush was convinced that occupying a nation of 25 million, full of arms and a violent past, with enemies on all sides, was do-able with 140,000 men... oh, and not to mention he immediately decided to 1) disband and 2) disperse the Iraqi army into the general population, without work, as well as remove all Baathists from the municipal workforce ... at what point, Fog, DO you truly begin to worry about the decisions of your leader?...

you're sounding like a tired old ball coach who can't spot talent any more and is too loyal... can't let go of the good hometown kid he has at quarterback ... a kid who just can't throw or remember the snap count, never could... but he's not even a good kid... he's a liar...

R. Clarke, about September 12, 2001, "The president, in a very intimidating way, left us, me and my staff, with the clear indication that he wanted us to come back with the word that there was an Iraqi hand behind 9/11 ... because they had been planning to do something about Iraq from before the time they came into office."

***Harry Boy*** · 05-20-2007, 07:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Patriot_in_NY

In due time, I'm almost certain Bush's greatest failure will end up to be the "IMMIGRATION" travisty. It has the single greatest ability to forever change the course of this country. In 5-6 we will increase our population by close to 8% (20-22 Million) mostly poor people that will be a fiscal burden. Many are adults that will soon siphon off SS and medcare systems. The shear weight of the fiscal burden will pull us quietly under the water we've barly floated on for 30-40 years.

Bush doesn't own this one alone either. They all failed us (the current American people). America as you know it is gone.

Tell this to the "Starry Eyed Liberal" and all they blabber about is "civil rights" and "diversity" they all live in their own little dream world where everybody skips around chasing butterflys, well if they thought things were bad in the old days wait until they see whats in store for them once this country is overflowing with the "New Immigrants" and they start to get a little power, your "Miranda Rights" will be long gone.

mikey · 05-20-2007, 09:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Harry Boy

Tell this to the "Starry Eyed Liberal" and all they blabber about is "civil rights" and "diversity" they all live in their own little dream world where everybody skips around chasing butterflys, well if they thought things were bad in the old days wait until they see whats in store for them once this country is overflowing with the "New Immigrants" and they start to get a little power, your "Miranda Rights" will be long gone.

There is no connection between "civil rights/diversity" and granting amnesty to illegal aliens.

"Civil rights" and "diversity" are about providing rights and equal opportunities to Americans and U.S. legal residents.

Amnesty is about granting citizenship to aliens who broke the law to enter this country.

.

Patriot_in_NY · 05-20-2007, 10:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mikey

There is no connection between "civil rights/diversity" and granting amnesty to illegal aliens.

"Civil rights" and "diversity" are about providing rights and equal opportunities to Americans and U.S. legal residents.

Amnesty is about granting citizenship to aliens who broke the law to enter this country.

.

That is true, but I might add one caveat. Diversity and multiculturalism is effected, in large part, on immigration policies and practices in place. Amnesty, as a practice can effect diversity but it's minimal since most of the folks are already here.

I totally agree with you on Civil Rights - they are citizen based.