Massachusetts pols thwart will of the people yet again... - Page 2 - New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard
NEWS
|
FORUM
|
PHOTOS
|
VIDEOS
|
FULL STATS DATABASE
|
PODCAST
|
RUMOR MILL
Get Social With PatsFans.com
Early Roster Projection
Ryan's Journey Started Early
POST DRAFT PODCAST

Go Back   New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard > Off Topic Forums > Political Discussion
Forgot Password? Join PatsFans.com!
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Arcade Mark Forums Read Chat Room

WELCOME TO OUR FORUM HERE AT PATSFANS.COM!
ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW

Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-10-2007, 09:46 AM   #11
Experienced Starter w/First Big Contract
 

Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 6,543
Default Re: Massachusetts pols thwart will of the people yet again...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Real World View Post
Maybe the government should get out of the business of marriage altogether and let the people decide. Maybe the problem isn't really with the government, or the people deciding, maybe it's that the result wouldn't be what you'd like.
The government getting out of marriage isn't the same as letting the people decide. Beyond that, I haven't a clue what you're talking about.

There are certain things that government, either directly through the people (as in the case of a ballot initiative) or through their elected representitives, is competent to decide. Other matters are private: the government doesn't tell you who you should be friends with or what job you should have "in the interest of society". Other governments might decide that for you, but in America we decided that we like to have autonimity. I think marriage is on the wrong side of that line right now by being treated as a public matter instead of a private one.
Pujo is offline   Reply With Quote
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!

Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account
including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.

NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98

Updated 07/08/11

Help Us Reach Our Goal!

Old 05-10-2007, 09:51 AM   #12
B.O. = Fugazi
 
BelichickFan's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 30,556
Send a message via AIM to BelichickFan
Default Re: Massachusetts pols thwart will of the people yet again...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Real World View Post
Maybe the government should get out of the business of marriage altogether and let the people decide. Maybe the problem isn't really with the government, or the people deciding, maybe it's that the result wouldn't be what you'd like.
Marriage is just one of many things the government uses to encourage certain behavior. Just like the tax deduction on mortgage interest is used to encourage home ownership. And the tax deduction on charitable donations is used to encourage charity. Bestowing the privilige of marriage is to encourage the lifestyle that most people think is appropriate and in the best interest of our society.
BelichickFan is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2007, 09:52 AM   #13
Experienced Starter w/First Big Contract
 

Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 6,543
Default Re: Massachusetts pols thwart will of the people yet again...

Quote:
Originally Posted by BelichickFan View Post
Marriage is just one of many things the government uses to encourage certain behavior. Just like the tax deduction on mortgage interest is used to encourage home ownership. And the tax deduction on charitable donations is used to encourage charity. Bestowing the privilige of marriage is to encourage the lifestyle that most people think is appropriate and in the best interest of our society.
Maybe the government should stop being our nanny and telling us what's best for us? I don't see a difference between this and taking all of your money through taxation and spending it on what they consider to be worthwhile causes.

Last edited by Pujo; 05-10-2007 at 09:52 AM..
Pujo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2007, 09:53 AM   #14
Hall of Fame Poster
 
Real World's Avatar
 

Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Boston
Posts: 25,165
My Mood: Yeehaw
Default Re: Massachusetts pols thwart will of the people yet again...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pujo View Post
The government getting out of marriage isn't the same as letting the people decide. Beyond that, I haven't a clue what you're talking about.

There are certain things that government, either directly through the people (as in the case of a ballot initiative) or through their elected representitives, is competent to decide. Other matters are private: the government doesn't tell you who you should be friends with or what job you should have "in the interest of society". Other governments might decide that for you, but in America we decided that we like to have autonimity. I think marriage is on the wrong side of that line right now by being treated as a public matter instead of a private one.
So I guess marraige doesn't have any legal ramifications right? It's not like the government can impose it's will upon you because of marraige right? Afterall, marraige is strictly private.
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


"The most difficult subjects can be explained to the most slow-witted man if he has not formed any idea of them already; but the simplest thing cannot be made clear to the most intelligent man if he is firmly persuaded that he knows already, without a shadow of doubt, what is laid before him."
Leo Tolstoy, 1897
Real World is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2007, 10:00 AM   #15
B.O. = Fugazi
 
BelichickFan's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 30,556
Send a message via AIM to BelichickFan
Default Re: Massachusetts pols thwart will of the people yet again...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pujo View Post
Maybe the government should stop being our nanny and telling us what's best for us? I don't see a difference between this and taking all of your money through taxation and spending it on what they consider to be worthwhile causes.
That's fine, I'm just saying this isn't wholly inconsistent with other things.

Personally I don't like supporting churches - however I am being forced to as all the charitable donations reduced people's tax burden; if not for that we could lower the base tax rate on everyone.

Seriously, why is the government in the business of supporting churches ? They don't pay taxes on all the donations nor do they pay property tax. It's a scam.
BelichickFan is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2007, 10:01 AM   #16
Experienced Starter w/First Big Contract
 

Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 6,543
Default Re: Massachusetts pols thwart will of the people yet again...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Real World View Post
So I guess marraige doesn't have any legal ramifications right? It's not like the government can impose it's will upon you because of marraige right? Afterall, marraige is strictly private.
I said we're on the wrong side of that line. Marriage is treated like a public matter for some strange reason, but that's not where it belongs.

It's amazing how disinclined people are to remember history. You, Real World, BelichickFan, etc, would all be arguing against letting interracial couples marry if this was 50 years ago (some of you might still think it's a bad idea today).

Face it, people who oppose gay marriage oppose it because they think it's icky and don't want to be reminded that there are gay people in the world. Then they backfill with "principles" about encouraging procreation.
Pujo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2007, 10:02 AM   #17
Experienced Starter w/First Big Contract
 

Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 6,543
Default Re: Massachusetts pols thwart will of the people yet again...

Quote:
Originally Posted by BelichickFan View Post
Seriously, why is the government in the business of supporting churches ? They don't pay taxes on all the donations nor do they pay property tax. It's a scam.
I'm with you on that!
Pujo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2007, 10:06 AM   #18
Hall of Fame Poster
 
Real World's Avatar
 

Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Boston
Posts: 25,165
My Mood: Yeehaw
Default Re: Massachusetts pols thwart will of the people yet again...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pujo View Post
I said we're on the wrong side of that line. Marriage is treated like a public matter for some strange reason, but that's not where it belongs.

It's amazing how disinclined people are to remember history. You, Real World, BelichickFan, etc, would all be arguing against letting interracial couples marry if this was 50 years ago (some of you might still think it's a bad idea today).

Face it, people who oppose gay marriage oppose it because they think it's icky and don't want to be reminded that there are gay people in the world. Then they backfill with "principles" about encouraging procreation.
Please don't try to tell me what I would have supported 50 years ago. That's such a pathetic, backhanded accusation of racism. Welcome to the fray I guess. When in doubt, call someone a racist. I guess our points don't fit your "bottom-line" eh? Pathetic.
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


"The most difficult subjects can be explained to the most slow-witted man if he has not formed any idea of them already; but the simplest thing cannot be made clear to the most intelligent man if he is firmly persuaded that he knows already, without a shadow of doubt, what is laid before him."
Leo Tolstoy, 1897
Real World is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2007, 10:18 AM   #19
Experienced Starter w/First Big Contract
 

Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 6,543
Default Re: Massachusetts pols thwart will of the people yet again...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Real World View Post
Please don't try to tell me what I would have supported 50 years ago. That's such a pathetic, backhanded accusation of racism. Welcome to the fray I guess. When in doubt, call someone a racist. I guess our points don't fit your "bottom-line" eh? Pathetic.
You're no more racist than you are homophobic. If the shoe fits, wear it.
Pujo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2007, 12:12 PM   #20
Hall of Fame Poster
 
Real World's Avatar
 

Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Boston
Posts: 25,165
My Mood: Yeehaw
Default Re: Massachusetts pols thwart will of the people yet again...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pujo View Post
You're no more racist than you are homophobic. If the shoe fits, wear it.
Yup, more bottom line kind of guy logic. When your point has no merrit, or an arguement has been thrown back in your face, just lob accusations of racism and homophobia. I'd say I'm surprised but....
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


"The most difficult subjects can be explained to the most slow-witted man if he has not formed any idea of them already; but the simplest thing cannot be made clear to the most intelligent man if he is firmly persuaded that he knows already, without a shadow of doubt, what is laid before him."
Leo Tolstoy, 1897

Last edited by Real World; 05-10-2007 at 12:12 PM..
Real World is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:13 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2

© Copyright 2000-2012. PatsFans.com Is a Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties.
The opinions posted in this forum do not necessarily reflect the opinions of our staff at PatsFans.com or USA Today.
We are not affiliated with the New England Patriots™ or the NFL™. The Photo Used In the header was taken by Ian Logue.

This site is owned and operated by I&K Internet Design Enterprises, LLC