All_Around_Brown

Here

C'mon W, don't let the polls do your bidding. Real World, he shouldn't listen to the polls anyhow. Right?

__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

PressCoverage

so he works for the American people, but he refuses to listen to them, and instead keeps on with his belligerant head-bashing against the concrete wall ...

this is what is scary about a religious wacko in the oval office... he's not serving you, me or G.I. Joe... he's serving his warped impression of God's wishes...

DarrylS

There who will come and defend what he is doing, despite the will and wishes of the American people.. heard something yesterday that concerned me, as it relates to the stock market.. so many people are making so much money from this debacle and the associated economy, there is very little activism. The Dow is now over 13,000.. the investor class is getting richer and the divide is widening. The need to change anything is not a very great need for those involved in the military industrial complex.

__________________
"Being the best doesn't mean you always win. It just means you win more than anyone else".. tweet from Kurt Warner to Tom Brady.

Real World

He shouldn't lead, or implement policy because of polls. Polls are important in the sense that they give you a measure of the publics sentiment. However, policy should never be passed because of what a poll says. During segregation, what policy would the polls demand be implemented? Furthermore, during WW II, had Roosevelt followed the polls, we'd be speaking German, or Japanese right now. Does this mean that polls and policy aren't on the same page? Of course not. It simply means that principle and common sense should be used to pass policy. Not polls.

__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


"The most difficult subjects can be explained to the most slow-witted man if he has not formed any idea of them already; but the simplest thing cannot be made clear to the most intelligent man if he is firmly persuaded that he knows already, without a shadow of doubt, what is laid before him."
Leo Tolstoy, 1897

All_Around_Brown

And in your opinion, is principle and common sense the order of the day under this administration?

__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Real World

The divide is always going to widen at it's extremes because of the sheer mathematics involved with interest and investment size. People who have money, even if invested in a 2% savings account, will always increase their pool of cash. If Shaq has $100 million, the odds are likely that he will increase that to $102 million the following year in such a basic scenario. People with large sums of money will almost always get richer, whereas those making $100k a year per say, by matters of mathamatics alone, will not. What is critical is that the middle class size increase in porportion to both population, and economic classes. Also, that unemployment remain low.

__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


"The most difficult subjects can be explained to the most slow-witted man if he has not formed any idea of them already; but the simplest thing cannot be made clear to the most intelligent man if he is firmly persuaded that he knows already, without a shadow of doubt, what is laid before him."
Leo Tolstoy, 1897

Pujo

I just want to say the obvious: the article above came from The Onion.

Real World

Like any and all administrations before this one, sometimes yes, and sometimes no. In the sense of what I like from government, this admin is further to the no end of the spectrum than to yes. That's obviously going to be different from person to person. My simple point before, and now, is that polls should not determine policy. Sticking a finger in the wind and seeing which way the wind is blowing is not a good line to follow.

__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


"The most difficult subjects can be explained to the most slow-witted man if he has not formed any idea of them already; but the simplest thing cannot be made clear to the most intelligent man if he is firmly persuaded that he knows already, without a shadow of doubt, what is laid before him."
Leo Tolstoy, 1897

PatsWSB47

This is not a pure democracy for a reason. Officials are elected to make decsions. If you don't like them, vote them out. Othrewise you could wind up with a situation where you have two wolves and a sheep deciding on what to have for dinner. That's democracy in it's purest form.

PressCoverage

well, i did try to vote him out... he certainly wasn't voted in....

unfortunately, i haven't figured out how to make my vote count for multiple people, or discount the votes of other people, or to switch others' votes to my candidate of choice... Karl Rove did...