nations around the world reject the idea that the United States should play the role of preeminent world leader. A majority of respondents polled in 15 countries, representing about 56 percent of the world’s population (the survey included China, India and Russia), also said the United States cannot be trusted any longer "to act responsibly in the world." As Richard Holbrooke, the former U.N. ambassador, sums it up bluntly: “No president will ever have handed over a worse international situation than George W. Bush.”

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/18209432...eek/from/RS.3/


After reading this report today, I was wondering what in your loyal eyes has our President done to strengthen the United States' international realtionships with nations not called the United Kingdom?

So you, and John Kerry, want the United States to shape our policies to fit the wants and needs of people currently eating dirt for nurishment in another country.

If China, India and any other third world country doesn't like the US, then they will be fine with the United STates expelling all of their citizens from the United States, barring the US from purchasing any goods from their countries, and of course end all United States aid to these enlighted countries.

__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Its another Rovian plot. The Bush administration spends like a drunken sailor because they want to put us so deeply in debt that any sort of Great-Society safety net is just out of the question because we can't afford it.

When it comes to world leadership, pre-Bush the other free nations of the world sort of accepted the US as leader in the context of somebody having to do it, so why not the USA? However, if we foul things up so badly that none of the other free nations would ever trust us again, then we'll never be called on to lead.