Released Memo of Bush-Blair 2003 Meeting: Deliberately Mislead the Public into War - New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard
NEWS
|
FORUM
|
PHOTOS
|
VIDEOS
|
FULL STATS DATABASE
|
PODCAST
|
RUMOR MILL
Get Social With PatsFans.com
Early Roster Projection
Ryan's Journey Started Early
POST DRAFT PODCAST

Go Back   New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard > Off Topic Forums > Political Discussion
Forgot Password? Join PatsFans.com!
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Arcade Mark Forums Read Chat Room

WELCOME TO OUR FORUM HERE AT PATSFANS.COM!
ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW

Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-27-2007, 08:36 PM   #1
Banned
 

Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 7,669
Default Released Memo of Bush-Blair 2003 Meeting: Deliberately Mislead the Public into War

Published by the BBC and other news, a 2003 memo reveals that months before the Iraq invasion and still no WMD were found yet, Bush and Blair plotted ways to manipulate Americans into the Iraqi invasion, including painting an American plane with United Nations colors and flying it into Iraq to be shot down, as well as producing a fake Iraqi 'defector' to confirm Saddam's WMDs:
----------

"From private talks between George Bush and UK PM Tony Blair, the memo makes it clear the US was determined to go to war whether or not he had UN backing.

The memo indicates both leaders acknowledged it was possible no unconventional weapons would be found in Iraq before the invasion, the New York Times says.

The note cites Mr Bush suggesting three ways in which Iraq could be provoked into confrontation. The US "was thinking of flying U2 reconnaissance aircraft with fighter cover over Iraq, painted in UN colours", Mr Bush said. If Saddam fired on them, the Iraqis would be in breach of UN resolutions, he suggested. He also indicated the US "might be able to bring out a defector" to talk about Saddam Hussein's weapons of mass destruction, and mentioned a proposal to assassinate the Iraqi leader."

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/4849744.stm

http://www.channel4.com/news/article...se+memo/161410

Last edited by maverick4; 03-27-2007 at 09:42 PM..
maverick4 is offline   Reply With Quote
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!

Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account
including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.

NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98

Updated 07/08/11

Help Us Reach Our Goal!

Old 03-27-2007, 10:48 PM   #2
Moderator
 

Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 22,127
My Mood: Fine
Default Re: Released Memo of Bush-Blair 2003 Meeting: Deliberately Mislead the Public into Wa

Well the Iraqi's had >6 months to move any materials out of the country while we screwed around at the UN with the French and Russians.

General Sada claimed that the material was sent to Syria by aircraft, after a dam break in 2006. The ISG felt it was improbable that any WMD was moved, but said they dcouldn't rule this possibility. They did not speak to Sada to the best of my knowledge.

UNMOVIC also reported to teh security councilo that WMD had been moved out of Iraq.

http://www.netscape.com/viewstory/20...php&frame=true
__________________
"Some guys play in all-star games, some guys don't. I don't know who picks all those all-star teams. In all honesty, I don't know who picks the combine, for that matter," Belichick said. "How does (Miami-Ohio offensive lineman Brandon) Brooks not get invited to the combine? How did Vollmer not get invited to the combine? I don't know. We can't really worry about that. We just have to try to evaluate them the best we can."
patsfan13 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-27-2007, 10:53 PM   #3
Banned
 

Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 7,669
Default Re: Released Memo of Bush-Blair 2003 Meeting: Deliberately Mislead the Public into Wa

patsfan13, regardless of conspiracy theories over what happened to the WMD (if they were ever there), the main issue is Bush and Blair plotted ways to bring this country to war by manufacturing alternative reasons in case the WMD reason wasn't enough. The point is, your beloved leader has been proven to go to lengths such as using lies, manipulation, and deception to accomplish his goals. You probably don't care though, as you choose to believe in Bush first and fit the rest of the facts of the world around that.
maverick4 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-27-2007, 10:58 PM   #4
Moderator
 

Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 22,127
My Mood: Fine
Default Re: Released Memo of Bush-Blair 2003 Meeting: Deliberately Mislead the Public into Wa

We know they were there from the dead bodies of the Kurds who were gassed. The possibility of the WMD being moved ( rom multiple sources), make simplistic blanket condemnations of the motives of the administraion seem like conspricacy mania.
__________________
"Some guys play in all-star games, some guys don't. I don't know who picks all those all-star teams. In all honesty, I don't know who picks the combine, for that matter," Belichick said. "How does (Miami-Ohio offensive lineman Brandon) Brooks not get invited to the combine? How did Vollmer not get invited to the combine? I don't know. We can't really worry about that. We just have to try to evaluate them the best we can."
patsfan13 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-27-2007, 11:09 PM   #5
Banned
 

Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 8,608
Default Re: Released Memo of Bush-Blair 2003 Meeting: Deliberately Mislead the Public into Wa

Quote:
Originally Posted by patsfan13 View Post
We know they were there from the dead bodies of the Kurds who were gassed. The possibility of the WMD being moved ( rom multiple sources), make simplistic blanket condemnations of the motives of the administraion seem like conspricacy mania.
yes, everyone is aware that bodies were gassed... YEARS before their shelf life would have waned to 2003 useless levels... no one is disputing Saddam had gas before the 91 Gulf War..... booooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooring....

if there was a modern program to develop WMDs, an inordinant amount of evidence would be left behind... you don't just pack up the plant and move it to the neighbor's... especially a neighbor that Saddam wasn't even speaking with at the time (Syria)....

your attempts to deflect from yet another piece of unflattering evidence against your manipulative Boy King hero remain hollow...

Last edited by PressCoverage; 03-27-2007 at 11:10 PM..
PressCoverage is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-27-2007, 11:10 PM   #6
Banned
 

Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 7,669
Default Re: Released Memo of Bush-Blair 2003 Meeting: Deliberately Mislead the Public into Wa

patsfan13, you seem to be deliberately changing the argument.

Regardless of what happened to WMD, Bush and Blair talked about coming up with other fake reasons to go into Iraq, such as painting a US plane with UN colors and getting it shot down by Iraqi forces, as a pretext for war.

Stop trying to bring the existence or non-existence of WMD into this discussion, it has nothing to do with that news article.

Last edited by maverick4; 03-27-2007 at 11:12 PM..
maverick4 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-27-2007, 11:16 PM   #7
Moderator
 

Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 22,127
My Mood: Fine
Default Re: Released Memo of Bush-Blair 2003 Meeting: Deliberately Mislead the Public into Wa

Just asking has anyone published a PDF of the original or are these claims that can't be verified?
__________________
"Some guys play in all-star games, some guys don't. I don't know who picks all those all-star teams. In all honesty, I don't know who picks the combine, for that matter," Belichick said. "How does (Miami-Ohio offensive lineman Brandon) Brooks not get invited to the combine? How did Vollmer not get invited to the combine? I don't know. We can't really worry about that. We just have to try to evaluate them the best we can."
patsfan13 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-27-2007, 11:18 PM   #8
Moderator
 

Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 22,127
My Mood: Fine
Default Re: Released Memo of Bush-Blair 2003 Meeting: Deliberately Mislead the Public into Wa

Quote:
Originally Posted by PressCoverage View Post
yes, everyone is aware that bodies were gassed... YEARS before their shelf life would have waned to 2003 useless levels... no one is disputing Saddam had gas before the 91 Gulf War..... booooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooring....

if there was a modern program to develop WMDs, an inordinant amount of evidence would be left behind... you don't just pack up the plant and move it to the neighbor's... especially a neighbor that Saddam wasn't even speaking with at the time (Syria)....

your attempts to deflect from yet another piece of unflattering evidence against your manipulative Boy King hero remain hollow...

THe Kurds were gassed in the mid 90's pay attention if you want to comment.

Well there were the translated Iraqi documents that spoke of their ongoing programs. A number have been published, but when the dems took control of congress the program was shut down.
__________________
"Some guys play in all-star games, some guys don't. I don't know who picks all those all-star teams. In all honesty, I don't know who picks the combine, for that matter," Belichick said. "How does (Miami-Ohio offensive lineman Brandon) Brooks not get invited to the combine? How did Vollmer not get invited to the combine? I don't know. We can't really worry about that. We just have to try to evaluate them the best we can."
patsfan13 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-27-2007, 11:20 PM   #9
Moderator
 

Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 22,127
My Mood: Fine
Default Re: Released Memo of Bush-Blair 2003 Meeting: Deliberately Mislead the Public into Wa

Quote:
Originally Posted by maverick4 View Post
patsfan13, you seem to be deliberately changing the argument.

Regardless of what happened to WMD, Bush and Blair talked about coming up with other fake reasons to go into Iraq, such as painting a US plane with UN colors and getting it shot down by Iraqi forces, as a pretext for war.

Stop trying to bring the existence or non-existence of WMD into this discussion, it has nothing to do with that news article.
IF they were awqare that the WMD were being moved and they knew that the French and Russians and Kofi (all of whom were doing business and getting $$$ from Saddam) perhap sthey were trying to figure out how to play the PR game?
__________________
"Some guys play in all-star games, some guys don't. I don't know who picks all those all-star teams. In all honesty, I don't know who picks the combine, for that matter," Belichick said. "How does (Miami-Ohio offensive lineman Brandon) Brooks not get invited to the combine? How did Vollmer not get invited to the combine? I don't know. We can't really worry about that. We just have to try to evaluate them the best we can."
patsfan13 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-2007, 12:07 PM   #10
Hall of Fame Poster
 
Real World's Avatar
 

Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Boston
Posts: 25,165
My Mood: Yeehaw
Default Re: Released Memo of Bush-Blair 2003 Meeting: Deliberately Mislead the Public into Wa

Quote:
Originally Posted by PressCoverage View Post
yes, everyone is aware that bodies were gassed... YEARS before their shelf life would have waned to 2003 useless levels...
I love the shelf life bit. As if anyone would take a dip in a 100 year old barrel of Antrax, or a 100 year old tub of VX.

That they didn't find any stock piles of weapons was very surprising to me. None the less, they didn't. What's perplexing is the Iraqi position prior to the war. If he didn't have any, then why the shirades for so many years? The resolution in question clearly put the onus on Iraq for a reason, or two actually. Those reasons were to ensure that Saddam came clean, since he had a history of use, and also to ensure that aggression were more likely. Why? Becuase it was more about geo-political change than anything else. Regime change has always been the motive with Saddam since the 90's.
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


"The most difficult subjects can be explained to the most slow-witted man if he has not formed any idea of them already; but the simplest thing cannot be made clear to the most intelligent man if he is firmly persuaded that he knows already, without a shadow of doubt, what is laid before him."
Leo Tolstoy, 1897
Real World is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:03 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2

© Copyright 2000-2012. PatsFans.com Is a Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties.
The opinions posted in this forum do not necessarily reflect the opinions of our staff at PatsFans.com or USA Today.
We are not affiliated with the New England Patriots™ or the NFL™. The Photo Used In the header was taken by Ian Logue.

This site is owned and operated by I&K Internet Design Enterprises, LLC