Originally Posted by PF1996

It would NOT be that difficult to pull this off. After all, the people actually RESPONSIBLE for the attacks are ALL DEAD. How do we KNOW that 19 middle Eastern men hijacked four planes? Because we WERE TOLD this by governmental authorities. It is VERY EASY fabricate identities and history. It's also very easy, particularly in this day, to change the nature of someone's identity and history to make it fit something you want. If common criminals can fake their own deaths and steal others' identities, it wouldn't be difficult for a government bureaucracy to do it. Also, the group of conspirators wouldn't have to be large, as long as the group included people at the very top. Once you put false information into an information system...the information is perceived as being true further along the line. All that would be needed for this conspiracy would be the individuals needed to fly the planes and the small group of power holders. The individuals flying the planes are dead - no one from that group can come forward. It's also highly unlikely that anyone from the small group of power holders would come forward since their reasons for killing thousands of people wouldn't be "money" but power/principle.

Governments throughout history have done many things that people considered "impossible" until the truth was revealed so I certainly don't think it's impossible for Bush administration to have done this if they felt it was necessary. And it's something that they could pull off quite easily. The only reason I reject the notion that the Bush administration was responsible is that I can't think - and haven't heard - of one reason why they would take such a huge risk. (Of course it's possible they weren't aware that the towers would collapse which would make it not so huge of a risk). Still...what was the purpose? If Iraq, then wouldn't it have made more sense for the hijackers to be predominantly Iraqi rather than Saudi and for Saddam to be blamed outright rather than bin Laden?

Originally Posted by GJAJ15

I get it, just be a sheeple.. believe what your gov't says, cause they never tell a lie .. never in my life have I done this or will do it... I have a right to my skepticism and my doubts.

Originally Posted by GJAJ15

I get it, just be a sheeple.. believe what your gov't says, cause they never tell a lie .. never in my life have I done this or will do it... I have a right to my skepticism and my doubts.

Originally Posted by PF1996

It would NOT be that difficult to pull this off. After all, the people actually RESPONSIBLE for the attacks are ALL DEAD. How do we KNOW that 19 middle Eastern men hijacked four planes? Because we WERE TOLD this by governmental authorities. It is VERY EASY fabricate identities and history. It's also very easy, particularly in this day, to change the nature of someone's identity and history to make it fit something you want. If common criminals can fake their own deaths and steal others' identities, it wouldn't be difficult for a government bureaucracy to do it. Also, the group of conspirators wouldn't have to be large, as long as the group included people at the very top. Once you put false information into an information system...the information is perceived as being true further along the line. All that would be needed for this conspiracy would be the individuals needed to fly the planes and the small group of power holders. The individuals flying the planes are dead - no one from that group can come forward. It's also highly unlikely that anyone from the small group of power holders would come forward since their reasons for killing thousands of people wouldn't be "money" but power/principle.

Governments throughout history have done many things that people considered "impossible" until the truth was revealed so I certainly don't think it's impossible for Bush administration to have done this if they felt it was necessary. And it's something that they could pull off quite easily. The only reason I reject the notion that the Bush administration was responsible is that I can't think - and haven't heard - of one reason why they would take such a huge risk. (Of course it's possible they weren't aware that the towers would collapse which would make it not so huge of a risk). Still...what was the purpose? If Iraq, then wouldn't it have made more sense for the hijackers to be predominantly Iraqi rather than Saudi and for Saddam to be blamed outright rather than bin Laden?

Originally Posted by gomezcat

"[B]
2) I AGREE with the rest of your post. The conspiracy thing is a complete crock of *****. I can't see for the life of me how Bush and the rest of the Administration could carry out 9/11 and get away with it. There is no way in the world that nobody would have come forward to say, "I know what happened", in return for immunity from prosecution.

Originally Posted by PF1996

It would NOT be that difficult to pull this off. After all, the people actually RESPONSIBLE for the attacks are ALL DEAD. How do we KNOW that 19 middle Eastern men hijacked four planes? Because we WERE TOLD this by governmental authorities. It is VERY EASY fabricate identities and history. It's also very easy, particularly in this day, to change the nature of someone's identity and history to make it fit something you want. If common criminals can fake their own deaths and steal others' identities, it wouldn't be difficult for a government bureaucracy to do it. Also, the group of conspirators wouldn't have to be large, as long as the group included people at the very top. Once you put false information into an information system...the information is perceived as being true further along the line. All that would be needed for this conspiracy would be the individuals needed to fly the planes and the small group of power holders. The individuals flying the planes are dead - no one from that group can come forward. It's also highly unlikely that anyone from the small group of power holders would come forward since their reasons for killing thousands of people wouldn't be "money" but power/principle.

Governments throughout history have done many things that people considered "impossible" until the truth was revealed so I certainly don't think it's impossible for Bush administration to have done this if they felt it was necessary. And it's something that they could pull off quite easily. The only reason I reject the notion that the Bush administration was responsible is that I can't think - and haven't heard - of one reason why they would take such a huge risk. (Of course it's possible they weren't aware that the towers would collapse which would make it not so huge of a risk). Still...what was the purpose? If Iraq, then wouldn't it have made more sense for the hijackers to be predominantly Iraqi rather than Saudi and for Saddam to be blamed outright rather than bin Laden?

Originally Posted by PF1996

It would NOT be that difficult to pull this off. After all, the people actually RESPONSIBLE for the attacks are ALL DEAD. How do we KNOW that 19 middle Eastern men hijacked four planes? Because we WERE TOLD this by governmental authorities. It is VERY EASY fabricate identities and history. It's also very easy, particularly in this day, to change the nature of someone's identity and history to make it fit something you want. If common criminals can fake their own deaths and steal others' identities, it wouldn't be difficult for a government bureaucracy to do it. Also, the group of conspirators wouldn't have to be large, as long as the group included people at the very top. Once you put false information into an information system...the information is perceived as being true further along the line. All that would be needed for this conspiracy would be the individuals needed to fly the planes and the small group of power holders. The individuals flying the planes are dead - no one from that group can come forward. It's also highly unlikely that anyone from the small group of power holders would come forward since their reasons for killing thousands of people wouldn't be "money" but power/principle.

Governments throughout history have done many things that people considered "impossible" until the truth was revealed so I certainly don't think it's impossible for Bush administration to have done this if they felt it was necessary. And it's something that they could pull off quite easily. The only reason I reject the notion that the Bush administration was responsible is that I can't think - and haven't heard - of one reason why they would take such a huge risk. (Of course it's possible they weren't aware that the towers would collapse which would make it not so huge of a risk). Still...what was the purpose? If Iraq, then wouldn't it have made more sense for the hijackers to be predominantly Iraqi rather than Saudi and for Saddam to be blamed outright rather than bin Laden?