Two Ohio Election officials convicted for rigging 2004 Election Recount - New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard
NEWS
|
FORUM
|
PHOTOS
|
VIDEOS
|
FULL STATS DATABASE
|
PODCAST
|
RUMOR MILL
Get Social With PatsFans.com
Early Roster Projection
Ryan's Journey Started Early
POST DRAFT PODCAST

Go Back   New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard > Off Topic Forums > Political Discussion
Forgot Password? Join PatsFans.com!
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Arcade Mark Forums Read Chat Room

WELCOME TO OUR FORUM HERE AT PATSFANS.COM!
ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW

Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-25-2007, 05:33 PM   #1
In the Starting Line-up
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,422
Default Two Ohio Election officials convicted for rigging 2004 Election Recount

http://www.ohio.com/mld/beaconjourna...e/16536269.htm



.

Last edited by mikey; 01-25-2007 at 05:34 PM..
mikey is offline   Reply With Quote
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!

Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account
including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.

NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98

Updated 07/08/11

Help Us Reach Our Goal!

Old 01-25-2007, 05:42 PM   #2
Hall of Fame Poster
 
Real World's Avatar
 

Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Boston
Posts: 25,147
My Mood: Yeehaw
Default Re: Two Ohio Election officials convicted for rigging 2004 Election Recount

Special prosecutor Kevin Baxter, who was brought in from Erie County to handle the case, did not claim the workers' actions affected the outcome of the election - Kerry gained 17 votes and Bush lost six in the county's recount.

But Baxter insisted the employees broke the law when they worked behind closed doors three days before the public Dec. 16, 2004, recount to pick ballots they knew would not cause discrepancies when checked by hand so they could avoid a lengthier, more expensive hand recount of all votes.

Ohio law states that during a recount each county is supposed to randomly count at least 3 percent of its ballots by hand and by machine. If there are not discrepancies in those counts, the rest of the votes can be recounted by machine. A full hand-count is ordered if two random samples result in differences.

Grier, the worker who was acquitted, was the only defendant who commented following the verdicts.

"It has all been very stressful," said Grier, 54. "Yes, I'm very relieved. But, none of us should have been in this courtroom today. These charges should not have been brought against any of us."

Defense lawyer Roger Synenberg said in his closing argument that the 2004 presidential election was the most publicly observed ever in Cuyahoga County and the workers were simply following procedures as they understood them.
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


"The most difficult subjects can be explained to the most slow-witted man if he has not formed any idea of them already; but the simplest thing cannot be made clear to the most intelligent man if he is firmly persuaded that he knows already, without a shadow of doubt, what is laid before him."
Leo Tolstoy, 1897
Real World is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2007, 05:46 PM   #3
All Pro Poster
 
Fogbuster's Avatar
 

Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 13,674
Default Re: Two Ohio Election officials convicted for rigging 2004 Election Recount

Quote:
Originally Posted by mikey View Post

Cleveland... Cleveland ... hm-m-m

Wasn't that the place the Dems were absolutely counting on to win Ohio in the '00 and '04 elections??? Wasn't Cleveland the reason good ol' departed Dan "Ortega" Rather switched his call in the '00 election ??? Florida was all smoke and mirrors for the Dems; OHIO was the big one they were counting on.

My, my, my. So they actually DID try to rig the election. Well, what do you know.


//
Fogbuster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2007, 06:18 PM   #4
B.O. = Fugazi
 
BelichickFan's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 30,556
Send a message via AIM to BelichickFan
Default Re: Two Ohio Election officials convicted for rigging 2004 Election Recount

Not saying what they did was right, but fixing it to avoid a re-count is very different from rigging the re-count. Most re-counts result in no change. They should have allowed the process to complete to it's natural conclusion but no re-count was rigged, just the opportunity to have a re-count was.
BelichickFan is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2007, 06:18 PM   #5
B.O. = Fugazi
 
BelichickFan's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 30,556
Send a message via AIM to BelichickFan
Default Re: Two Ohio Election officials convicted for rigging 2004 Election Recount

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fogbuster View Post
My, my, my. So they actually DID try to rig the election. Well, what do you know.
No they didn't, they just took a shortcut (one they shouldn't have taken) to reaching was very likely would have been the same result.
BelichickFan is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2007, 06:26 PM   #6
All Pro Poster
 
Fogbuster's Avatar
 

Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 13,674
Default Re: Two Ohio Election officials convicted for rigging 2004 Election Recount

Quote:
Originally Posted by BelichickFan View Post
No they didn't, they just took a shortcut (one they shouldn't have taken) to reaching was very likely would have been the same result.

Oh, I see. And the reason they took that "shortcut" was ... ? To ensure an honest election ??? If so, then why were they convicted of anything??


//
Fogbuster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2007, 06:29 PM   #7
B.O. = Fugazi
 
BelichickFan's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 30,556
Send a message via AIM to BelichickFan
Default Re: Two Ohio Election officials convicted for rigging 2004 Election Recount

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fogbuster View Post
Oh, I see. And the reason they took that "shortcut" was ... ? To ensure an honest election ??? If so, then why were they convicted of anything??
They probably didn't want to go through the hassle. I didn't say it was right. But the election, up to the re-count, hasn't been accused on being dishonest. All that was lost was the very slim chance of a re-count reversal. Again, it should have been re-counted but it's more of a technicality than an actual election theft.
BelichickFan is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2007, 06:39 PM   #8
All Pro Poster
 
Holy Diver's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Big Frisco
Posts: 10,798
My Mood: Angelic
Default Re: Two Ohio Election officials convicted for rigging 2004 Election Recount

its really wonderful that we are looking to influence the world about freedom and democracy. What a splendid example we set for other nations.

shame shame shame.

at least nothing really bad happened. At least our 'elected' leader isn' a psychopathic power hungry bully who is hell bent on world domination. thank God we dodged that bullet!
Holy Diver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2007, 06:39 PM   #9
All Pro Poster
 
Fogbuster's Avatar
 

Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 13,674
Default Re: Two Ohio Election officials convicted for rigging 2004 Election Recount

Quote:
Originally Posted by BelichickFan View Post
They probably didn't want to go through the hassle. I didn't say it was right. But the election, up to the re-count, hasn't been accused on being dishonest. All that was lost was the very slim chance of a re-count reversal. Again, it should have been re-counted but it's more of a technicality than an actual election theft.

If you say so.


//
Fogbuster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2007, 06:42 PM   #10
Experienced Starter w/First Big Contract
 

Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 6,542
Default Re: Two Ohio Election officials convicted for rigging 2004 Election Recount

If you believe the prosecutor, this was more an act of lazyness than an act of election rigging. Still doesn't sit well that it happened in Ohio of all places.

Last edited by Pujo; 01-25-2007 at 06:43 PM..
Pujo is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:46 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2

© Copyright 2000-2012. PatsFans.com Is a Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties.
The opinions posted in this forum do not necessarily reflect the opinions of our staff at PatsFans.com or USA Today.
We are not affiliated with the New England Patriots™ or the NFL™. The Photo Used In the header was taken by Ian Logue.

This site is owned and operated by I&K Internet Design Enterprises, LLC