ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW
Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!
"The picture I will lay out for you today is not a pretty one and it’s getting worse with the passage of time," said David M. Walker, Comptroller General of the United States, in a Thursday morning hearing of the Senate's Budget Committee. "Continuing on our current fiscal path would gradually erode, if not suddenly damage, our economy, our standard of living, and ultimately even our domestic tranquility and our national security," he warned.
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!
Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.
NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98
Tax receipts, not tax rates. Growing the economy and slowing spending rates would get it done without a disaster. The biggest problems are social security and, especially, medicare. We need to encourage people to save for retirement so that we can reduce the growth of these items.
Tax receipts, not tax rates. Growing the economy and slowing spending rates would get it done without a disaster. The biggest problems are social security and, especially, medicare. We need to encourage people to save for retirement so that we can reduce the growth of these items.
Don't forget mounting debt to offset that modest growth.
Don't forget mounting debt to offset that modest growth.
Not sure what you're saying there. As a Republican, though, I don't disagree with the problem although I have a problem with the BS jab at Bush. Although he has exacerbated the problem, it wouldn't have been that much better had he never been elected.
Not sure what you're saying there. As a Republican, though, I don't disagree with the problem although I have a problem with the BS jab at Bush. Although he has exacerbated the problem, it wouldn't have been that much better had he never been elected.
Are you kidding? How much money has the war in Iraq cost, again? No doubt a Democratic admin would be spending left and right, but they'd be hard-pressed to spend the kind of money Bush has in Iraq.
And besides, if it were Dems squandering money I'd be blasting them, too, I don't like others spending my money.
Hey, Bush has spent money like a liberal could never dream. EVERY administration wastes money, and NONE ever cut government, they only increase it. What Bush has done is mind boggling. He's the anti fiscal-conservative. Seriously, it's laughable when people call this guy a conservative in the common sense. He's a religious loon maybe, but not a conservative. Anyhow, how's this guy come to his conclusions? I thought I read an article that talked about us being balanced, annually that is, by 2010 or 2012? I know tax receipts are coming in higher than expected. Where's he come in with 2040? Now, I'm not trying to dispute his assessments, I'm merely curious as to how he came up with his figures. I'm a HUGE proponent of smaller, more fiscally sane government. I think most in here know that. Remember people, we're at close to $9 Trillion in national debt. As Austin Powers would say:
Ouch baby, very ouch!
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
"The most difficult subjects can be explained to the most slow-witted man if he has not formed any idea of them already; but the simplest thing cannot be made clear to the most intelligent man if he is firmly persuaded that he knows already, without a shadow of doubt, what is laid before him." Leo Tolstoy, 1897
Are you kidding? How much money has the war in Iraq cost, again? No doubt a Democratic admin would be spending left and right, but they'd be hard-pressed to spend the kind of money Bush has in Iraq
The war is expensive but :
1) Although it's cost a lot, it's cost is overstated as many of the costs (paying the military personnel, etc) would have been incurred in peace time too.
2) It's a (big) one time cost (plus interest). As opposed to social security and medicare which never go away and have large growth rates. Sort of like if you took $25K out of a bank account to buy a car, that's a large expense. But it's much more "expensive" to take it out of the stock market and lose all the growth the money would have earned.