1 Dead Saddam = 3,000 Dead American Boys - Page 3 - New England Patriots Forums

***Patters*** · 12-30-2006, 01:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Real World

The position stems from the fact that the radicals have made public their desire to use the MSM, and public sentiment against the US cause. There is validity to this position. By mutilating and kill ing US soldiers, the radicals hope that people like NEM become more abundant. The enemy knows it cannot defeat us on the battlefield, so they hope to defeat us at home. The more NEMs there are screaming, the more momentum the enemy builds. Say what you will about what such a position means, but there certainly is some sense in the argument.

So, it's your contention that if the Americans pull out of Iraq, more American soldiers will die? And you oppose that? Meanwhile Al Qaeda supports pulling the Americans out because if we're out of there, more Americans will die? I don't think that makes much sense.

Now if your point concerns policies, not the lives of troops, it makes more sense. The terrorists certainly would like us to leave Iraq, but that will always be true. Even in the rosiest right-wing scenario, the Americans will eventually pull out of Iraq and, by your reasoning, be allied with the terrorists.

Real World · 12-30-2006, 01:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Patters

So, it's your contention that if the Americans pull out of Iraq, more American soldiers will die? And you oppose that? Meanwhile Al Qaeda supports pulling the Americans out because if we're out of there, more Americans will die? I don't think that makes much sense.

Now if your point concerns policies, not the lives of troops, it makes more sense. The terrorists certainly would like us to leave Iraq, but that will always be true. Even in the rosiest right-wing scenario, the Americans will eventually pull out of Iraq and, by your reasoning, be allied with the terrorists.

I have no idea what your point is here. Sorry.

Obviously, no troops in Iraq = no american deaths in Iraq. 2 + 2 = 4.

The question put forth was why someone would call NEM a troop killer, or traitor for wanting a complete withdrawl. I simply tried to explain why someone would say that.

Turd Furguson · 12-30-2006, 03:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NEM

The first of TWO Brutal murdering dictators has been done away with. How long till the 2nd gets his just due?

George W. Bush is the most vile, venemous and disgusting human being on the face of the earth.

He allowed his family friend, Osama Bin Laden, to get away with the murder of 3,000 Americans, and now has been responsible for the death of another 3,000, all so that he could fulfill his long time vendetta against Saddam Hussein.

I hope that George W. Bush rots in hell, and very soon, too.

Saddam Hussein was not a decent man, to his own people, but George W. Bush has suprassed him as far as evil.

NEM never ceases to amaze me with his vile and venom.

I'd like documentation of OBL being a family friend of G.W.B please.

If you're referring to the "2nd murderous dictator" as Bush, I'd also like documentation of his ascension to dictator please.

***BelichickFan*** · 12-30-2006, 05:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NEM

Bush was responsible for them being there

That I do agree with. Along with all the other Republicans and Democrats who voted for it.

***BelichickFan*** · 12-30-2006, 05:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NEM

How can someone whos was NOT elected in the first place be re-elected?

Well regardless of the 2000 argument, I think everyone agrees he was elected in 2004 so the question is still pertinent.

***BelichickFan*** · 12-30-2006, 05:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sdaniels7114

In a nutshell, Yes. If there was a way to implement it, I'd be all for convicting anyone who's ever voted for Bush for ANY office and sentencing them to being banned from voting again.

Wow. Well I give you credit for having the balls to say this - seriously. I think you're psychotic but your honesty impresses me.

nhpatsfan · 12-30-2006, 05:26 PM

NEM, what lies? I keep reading about Bush's lies in your posts, but have never seen any specifics.

***Harry Boy*** · 12-30-2006, 05:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sdaniels7114

If there was a way to implement it, I'd be all for convicting anyone who's ever voted for Bush for ANY office and sentencing them to being banned from voting again.

Then there would be nobody left to vote but a bunch of politically correct whacko a$s holes, Mexico would take the country over and we would all be having bowel movements in the street and chickens sleeping in our bedrooms with us.

***Harry Boy*** · 12-30-2006, 05:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NEM

Patters, check, your PM's.

Oh, oh..................

***Patters*** · 12-30-2006, 05:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by nhpatsfan

NEM, what lies? I keep reading about Bush's lies in your posts, but have never seen any specifics.

I'm sure NEM's talking about the lies about uranium from Niger, WMDs, Saddam's collusion with Al Qaeda, etc. These issues have long been talked about here, so it's sort of taken for granted. Other lies could include issues involving his military record, his use of drugs and alcohol, and his business connections. Still other lies could include whether he's been dishonest in his dealings with Halliburton and the big oil companies. One also has to wonder if he's been forthcoming regarding his advance knowledge of 9/11, what he really did about Al Qaeda prior to 9/11, and why he let 21 members of the bin Laden family leave the U.S. the day after 9/11. Obviously, the list of questions gets long, but now that we don't have a coverup Congress, perhaps some of these questions will be answered in the next two years.