Quote:
|
Originally Posted by QuiGon
I honestly can't see
|
At that point, I knew you were just b.s.ing. On the other hand, since you never post links to support your opinions, maybe you don't read and gather all your information from Kerry Healey ads.
Here's the Globe editorial that raised serious issues about the LaGuer case, and I'm glad your nonsubstantive post created the opportunity to post this information:
http://www.bluemassgroup.com/showDiary.do?diaryId=4330
"When Benjamin Laguer was sentenced in 1984 to life in prison for raping a Leominster neighbor, the jury ruled without a shred of physical evidence linking him to the crime. Later, the judge dismissed allegations that racist remarks had been made by the jury after questioning only four of the 12 jurors, and despite one member's affidavit asserting that explicit racial insults had been made.
...
"The evidence for a new trial is overwhelming. William Nowick, one of the 12 white male jurors in Laguer's trial, signed an affidavit recalling these remarks by the jury's foreman: 'The goddamned spic is guilty just sitting there. Look at him. Why even bother having a trial.' When jurors speculated as to how the eight-hour rape could continue for so long, Nowick says that the same juror said: 'Spics screw all day and night.'
"During the trial, Leominster police asserted that all their evidence, including fingerprints and the victim's pocketbook, had been lost. The prosecution's case rested on the victim's identification of Laguer in a photo lineup.
"But the victim, a diagnosed schizophrenic who was taking pain medication when she fingered Laguer, had trouble distinguishing between white and black men during the trial. Evidence of her mental state was deemed inadmissable...."
As any fairminded can see, there were valid issues surrounding this case, and if it had turned out LaGuer was innocent, it would have meant a violent rapist was still on the loose. At any rate, now that the DNA evidence is in, Patrick no longer supports a La Guer's release.