Bush Blamed More Than Clinton for Failure to Capture Bin Laden - New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard
NEWS
|
FORUM
|
PHOTOS
|
VIDEOS
|
FULL STATS DATABASE
|
PODCAST
|
RUMOR MILL
Get Social With PatsFans.com
Early Roster Projection
Ryan's Journey Started Early
POST DRAFT PODCAST

Go Back   New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard > Off Topic Forums > Political Discussion
Forgot Password? Join PatsFans.com!
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Arcade Mark Forums Read Chat Room

WELCOME TO OUR FORUM HERE AT PATSFANS.COM!
ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW

Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-27-2006, 08:06 AM   #1
Moderator
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 16,357
My Mood: Mellow
Default Bush Blamed More Than Clinton for Failure to Capture Bin Laden

Most Americans aren't fooled by the right wing propaganda machine, at least when it comes to who is more responsible for the failure to catch bin Laden.

http://www.galluppoll.com/content/?ci=24733

"According to a recent Gallup Panel survey, the American public puts the primary blame on Bush rather than Clinton for the fact that bin Laden has not been captured. A majority of Americans say Bush is more to blame (53%), compared with 36% blaming Clinton."

If you take partisanship out of the question, and just go with independents, Clinton also holds a sizable advantage:

"Clinton's strong advantage among the general public on this question comes more from the fact that political independents are closer to the Democratic side in their attitudes, with a solid majority blaming Bush more than Clinton (58% vs. 31%)."
Patters is offline   Reply With Quote
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!

Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account
including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.

NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98

Updated 07/08/11

Help Us Reach Our Goal!

Old 09-27-2006, 08:21 AM   #2
B.O. = Fugazi
 
BelichickFan's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 30,556
Send a message via AIM to BelichickFan
Default Re: Bush Blamed More Than Clinton for Failure to Capture Bin Laden

Now I would agree with that. No doubt.

However if the question were "who should be blamed more that Bin Laden wasn't captured before 9/11/01" then my answer undoubtedly would be Billy Boy.
BelichickFan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-27-2006, 08:36 AM   #3
Banned
 
QuiGon's Avatar
 

Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 6,123
Default Re: Bush Blamed More Than Clinton for Failure to Capture Bin Laden

Quote:
Originally Posted by BelichickFan
However if the question were "who should be blamed more that Bin Laden wasn't captured before 9/11/01" then my answer undoubtedly would be Billy Boy.
Amen to that. And I think it is very telling that he went into a purple faced tirade when confronted with the truth. I guess the truth hurts even ex-presidents who were more interested in receiving fellatio than in protecting and defending the United States from all threats, foreign and domestic.
QuiGon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-27-2006, 08:54 AM   #4
Hall of Fame Poster
 
Real World's Avatar
 

Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Boston
Posts: 25,162
My Mood: Yeehaw
Default Re: Bush Blamed More Than Clinton for Failure to Capture Bin Laden

People are funny. Instead of trying to figure out what we're going to do as a nation to combat the threat of global terrorism, these stupid azz politicians, and there mentally challenged followers, are arguing who's done a shiittier job. How about this, everyone sucked prior to 9/11.
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


"The most difficult subjects can be explained to the most slow-witted man if he has not formed any idea of them already; but the simplest thing cannot be made clear to the most intelligent man if he is firmly persuaded that he knows already, without a shadow of doubt, what is laid before him."
Leo Tolstoy, 1897
Real World is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-27-2006, 09:13 AM   #5
Moderator
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 16,357
My Mood: Mellow
Default Re: Bush Blamed More Than Clinton for Failure to Capture Bin Laden

Quote:
Originally Posted by Real World
People are funny. Instead of trying to figure out what we're going to do as a nation to combat the threat of global terrorism, these stupid azz politicians, and there mentally challenged followers, are arguing who's done a shiittier job. How about this, everyone sucked prior to 9/11.
Actually, Clinton said nothing about it until the other day. I guess he just got tired of all the attempts -- by Bush apologists, ABC, Fox, etc. -- to rewrite history. Perhaps the righties should follow your advice and stop trying to blame Clinton for everything that goes wrong during Bush's presidency. I'm not saying that you do that, but you well know that a number of people in this forum do that on a regular basis. Your comment probably would have come across as more sincere had you made it anytime before Clinton spoke up. Right now, it smacks of political convenience.

I also think that Clinton commented as a means of keeping the Iraq war and bin Laden as central election issues. They're important issues for rallying the liberal Democrats even when on other issues the Democrats are mostly taking the middle ground.
Patters is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-27-2006, 10:27 AM   #6
B.O. = Fugazi
 
BelichickFan's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 30,556
Send a message via AIM to BelichickFan
Default Re: Bush Blamed More Than Clinton for Failure to Capture Bin Laden

Quote:
Originally Posted by Patters
Actually, Clinton said nothing about it until the other day. I guess he just got tired of all the attempts -- by Bush apologists, ABC, Fox, etc. -- to rewrite history.
Bull*****, Patters. If the (D)s can blame Bush for not doing something in 8 months, the (R)s can certainly blame Clinton for not doing something in 8 years. Now, the time since 9/11/01 is a different issue. But if Bush *****ed up before that then Clinton did even more.
BelichickFan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-27-2006, 11:31 AM   #7
On the Roster
 
Hawg 73's Avatar
 

Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: On the edge of despair
Posts: 91
Default Re: Bush Blamed More Than Clinton for Failure to Capture Bin Laden

Quote:
Originally Posted by BelichickFan
Bull*****, Patters. If the (D)s can blame Bush for not doing something in 8 months, the (R)s can certainly blame Clinton for not doing something in 8 years. Now, the time since 9/11/01 is a different issue. But if Bush *****ed up before that then Clinton did even more.
8 months. It's been 6 years!!!He hasn't done a damn thing in 6 years!
__________________
Last year is last year!!!
Hawg 73 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-27-2006, 12:07 PM   #8
Hall of Fame Poster
 
Real World's Avatar
 

Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Boston
Posts: 25,162
My Mood: Yeehaw
Default Re: Bush Blamed More Than Clinton for Failure to Capture Bin Laden

Personally speaking, I think Clinton dropped the ball with respect to Al-Queda and UBL. I'm not sure anyone really saw it coming, 9/11 that is, but in hindsight, remember it's hindsight, he was in control when we were attacked repeatedly throughout the 90's, and therefore he hould have understood the sincerity of the threat. Just my 2 cents. As for GW, although he was only on the job for 8 months, he does deserve blame. Ultimately, it is his, and his administrations responsibility, to do their due dilligence when assuming control. I don't think pointing figures toward the past serves any purpose. It doesn't change what happened. Thankfully messures have been taken to assure that information is properly shared amongst the intell agencies that serve to protect our nation. Had those messures been in place prior, who knows what would have happened, or not happened.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Patters

I also think that Clinton commented as a means of keeping the Iraq war and bin Laden as central election issues. They're important issues for rallying the liberal Democrats even when on other issues the Democrats are mostly taking the middle ground.
As long as you admit that it is both sides who are politicizing this crap. Shameful to them both. Reinforces my belief that party politics is aweful. Each side lies, or twists the truth to fit there agenda.
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


"The most difficult subjects can be explained to the most slow-witted man if he has not formed any idea of them already; but the simplest thing cannot be made clear to the most intelligent man if he is firmly persuaded that he knows already, without a shadow of doubt, what is laid before him."
Leo Tolstoy, 1897
Real World is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-27-2006, 12:10 PM   #9
B.O. = Fugazi
 
BelichickFan's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 30,556
Send a message via AIM to BelichickFan
Default Re: Bush Blamed More Than Clinton for Failure to Capture Bin Laden

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hawg 73
8 months. It's been 6 years!!!He hasn't done a damn thing in 6 years!
Read the *****ing thread. I have said that I agree Bush has *****ed up since 9/11/01. The issue is Clinton's BS about Clinton doing everything he could and that Bush did nothing BEFORE 9/11/01.

8 months vs. 8 years, Clinton.

Now, in the time since, I have blamed Bush including in this thread.
BelichickFan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-27-2006, 12:18 PM   #10
Hall of Fame Poster
 
Real World's Avatar
 

Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Boston
Posts: 25,162
My Mood: Yeehaw
Default Re: Bush Blamed More Than Clinton for Failure to Capture Bin Laden

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hawg 73
8 months. It's been 6 years!!!He hasn't done a damn thing in 6 years!
I think that's a little inaccurate. We've been zapping Al-Queda leaders and members all over the world. We just thwarted a terror attack that was designed to blow up 10 passenger planes, or about 4,000 people. I remember it distinctly cuz I was in Europe when it happened. I think that is progress.
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


"The most difficult subjects can be explained to the most slow-witted man if he has not formed any idea of them already; but the simplest thing cannot be made clear to the most intelligent man if he is firmly persuaded that he knows already, without a shadow of doubt, what is laid before him."
Leo Tolstoy, 1897
Real World is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:57 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2

© Copyright 2000-2012. PatsFans.com Is a Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties.
The opinions posted in this forum do not necessarily reflect the opinions of our staff at PatsFans.com or USA Today.
We are not affiliated with the New England Patriots™ or the NFL™. The Photo Used In the header was taken by Ian Logue.

This site is owned and operated by I&K Internet Design Enterprises, LLC