We have destroyed a nation - Page 2 - New England Patriots Forums

All_Around_Brown · 08-01-2006, 03:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pujo

Ahh. There's nothing in the constitution saying someone can't be pardoned twice (it would obviously be for different acts).

Yes, thats what I was getting at. How ironic that someone who was pardoned for Iran contra could be pardoned for Iraqgate.

Pujo · 08-01-2006, 03:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by All_Around_Brown

Yes, thats what I was getting at. How ironic that someone who was pardoned for Iran contra could be pardoned for Iraqgate.

Lol, I think it's the opposite of ironic

***patsfan13*** · 08-01-2006, 04:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by All_Around_Brown

Give it up. Most Iraqis were better off before we invaded. Any poll you look at reveals the same. It wasn't paradise, but they had electricity to refrigerate food on those 115 degree desert afternoons.

Really I have seen polls showing most Iraqi's are optimistic about their future. Could you please cite the polls showing the Iraqi people would like to see the Saddam regieme back in power?

I don't think there is any poll showing the Iraqi people want to see Saddam back in power.

Pujo · 08-01-2006, 05:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by patsfan13

Really I have seen polls showing most Iraqi's are optimistic about their future. Could you please cite the polls showing the Iraqi people would like to see the Saddam regieme back in power?

I don't think there is any poll showing the Iraqi people want to see Saddam back in power.

Right now, polls show most Americans don't want Bush in power. Does that mean another country should occupy us?

There are three possible reasons we invaded Iraq, which one do you think it was?
A) For the American people
B) For the Iraqi people
C) For Bush's people

You can only pick one.

***IcyPatriot*** · 08-01-2006, 05:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NEM

What's higher than "Pope?"

MRS. NEM FOR YOU >>

Pujo · 08-01-2006, 05:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NEM

He will be the next President of Iraq, once he is acquitted.

Now, dont get me wrong. He was guilty of many things, IMO, but in this particular trial, I dont believe they proved that he was gujilty of the crime they are accusing him of doing. From all that I read, and heard, they had no witnesses and no evidence to convict him. IMO, of course.

But, assuming they dont convict him, he is then free, and he can do one of two things.... attempt to re claim the presidency, saying that the current Iraqi Government is illegal, under Iraqi law..... or ....wait till next year's election and run for President...

In either case, I believe he will be the next President of Iraq.

Like I said, he had done lmany bad things, in the past, which I dont believe he would do again...and he has paid dearly with the lives of his two sons.....

But If he becomes President, I cant wait to hear what the vil bastard Bush has to say about it.

Would it not be ironic if Saddam becomes President and Bush ends up in Leavenworth. Fitting, I say, as far as Bush goes.

It's a monkey trial, NEM, he isn't going to be acquitted. His only valid argument is be the lack of the tribunal's legitimacy, but the court won't entertain that argument.