07-18-2006, 05:46 PM
|
#2
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 22,120
My Mood:
|
Re: A Windfall From Shifts to Medicare
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Patters
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/07/18/bu...in&oref=slogin
The pharmaceutical industry is beginning to reap a windfall from a surprisingly lucrative niche market: drugs for poor people.
And analysts expect the benefits to show up in many of the quarterly financial results that drug makers will begin posting this week.
The windfall, which by some estimates could be $2 billion or more this year, is a result of the transfer of millions of low-income people into the new Medicare Part D drug program that went into effect in January. Under that program, as it turns out, the prices paid by insurers, and eventually the taxpayer, for the medications given to those transferred are likely to be higher than what was paid under the federal-state Medicaid programs for the poor.
About 6.5 million low-income elderly people or younger disabled poor people were automatically transferred into the Part D program for drug coverage. Because their other health needs are still covered by Medicaid, they are called dual eligibles.
|
Medical Insurance programs funding by the goverment along with a lack of tort reform has exploded the cost of medicine. A Medical Savings program as proposed by Steve Forbes would be much beter, but it will never happen.
__________________
"Some guys play in all-star games, some guys don't. I don't know who picks all those all-star teams. In all honesty, I don't know who picks the combine, for that matter," Belichick said. "How does (Miami-Ohio offensive lineman Brandon) Brooks not get invited to the combine? How did Vollmer not get invited to the combine? I don't know. We can't really worry about that. We just have to try to evaluate them the best we can."
|
|
|
Linear Mode
