Haliburton On The Outside Looking In - New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard
NEWS
|
FORUM
|
PHOTOS
|
VIDEOS
|
FULL STATS DATABASE
|
PODCAST
|
RUMOR MILL
Get Social With PatsFans.com
Early Roster Projection
Ryan's Journey Started Early
POST DRAFT PODCAST

Go Back   New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard > Off Topic Forums > Political Discussion
Forgot Password? Join PatsFans.com!
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Arcade Mark Forums Read Chat Room

WELCOME TO OUR FORUM HERE AT PATSFANS.COM!
ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW

Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-12-2006, 04:06 PM   #1
----> Iron Mod <----
 
IcyPatriot's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 31,494
Default Haliburton On The Outside Looking In

Halliburton is having the rug puled out from underneath them. Come Fall...they will be just one of 3 companies contracting with the military. There will be a 4th company overseeing the 3 service companies.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...101459_pf.html


This ought to make democrats and
liberals happy...is it a present before elections?


Quote:
The Army is discontinuing a controversial multibillion-dollar deal with oil services giant Halliburton Co. to provide logistical support to U.S. troops worldwide, a decision that could cut deeply into the firm's dominance of government contracting in Iraq.

The choice comes after several years of attacks from critics who saw the contract as a symbol of politically connected corporations profiteering on the war
ALSO... http://www.halliburtonwatch.org/news/hal.html
IcyPatriot is offline   Reply With Quote
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!

Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account
including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.

NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98

Updated 07/08/11

Help Us Reach Our Goal!

Old 07-12-2006, 05:09 PM   #2
PatsFans.com Supporter
 
DarrylS's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: In a very special place
Posts: 36,188
My Mood: Psychedelic
Default Re: Haliburton On The Outside Looking In

Isn't Bechtel, the primary contractor for the big dig, a subsidiary of Halliburton?? Seems as though they are having problems on a couple of fronts, but remember there is no need to bid as they have the equipment to do the job.
__________________
"Being the best doesn't mean you always win. It just means you win more than anyone else".. tweet from Kurt Warner to Tom Brady.
DarrylS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-12-2006, 07:24 PM   #3
Moderator
 

Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 22,109
My Mood: Fine
Default Re: Haliburton On The Outside Looking In

Quote:
Originally Posted by GJAJ15
Isn't Bechtel, the primary contractor for the big dig, a subsidiary of Halliburton?? Seems as though they are having problems on a couple of fronts, but remember there is no need to bid as they have the equipment to do the job.
Bechtel and Halliburton are not related.
__________________
"Some guys play in all-star games, some guys don't. I don't know who picks all those all-star teams. In all honesty, I don't know who picks the combine, for that matter," Belichick said. "How does (Miami-Ohio offensive lineman Brandon) Brooks not get invited to the combine? How did Vollmer not get invited to the combine? I don't know. We can't really worry about that. We just have to try to evaluate them the best we can."
patsfan13 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-12-2006, 07:39 PM   #4
In the Starting Line-up
 
All_Around_Brown's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 3,098
My Mood: Inspired
Default Re: Haliburton On The Outside Looking In

Quote:
Originally Posted by F.B.N.
Halliburton is having the rug puled out from underneath them. Come Fall...they will be just one of 3 companies contracting with the military. There will be a 4th company overseeing the 3 service companies.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...101459_pf.html



This ought to make democrats and
liberals happy...is it a present before elections?



ALSO... http://www.halliburtonwatch.org/news/hal.html
FBN...you consider yourself a moderate correct?

Why is it that fiscal responsibility is now a democrat/liberal issue?

Can't we agree that the no bid contracts were bogus from the start and the complete lack of accountability that ensued had to be corrected?

Its funny that liberal/democrat is now being associated with fiscal responsibility. Thats another voting bloc the GOP has lost under Bush and his corrupt Abramoff Congress - fiscal conservatives.
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
All_Around_Brown is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-12-2006, 09:46 PM   #5
----> Iron Mod <----
 
IcyPatriot's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 31,494
Default Re: Haliburton On The Outside Looking In

Quote:
Originally Posted by All_Around_Brown
FBN...you consider yourself a moderate correct?

Why is it that fiscal responsibility is now a democrat/liberal issue?
BUSH had a happy pen so he could have his way with the war IMO.

Can't we agree that the no bid contracts were bogus from the start and the complete lack of accountability that ensued had to be corrected?
That would be fair to say IMO.

Its funny that liberal/democrat is now being associated with fiscal responsibility. Thats another voting bloc the GOP has lost under Bush and his corrupt Abramoff Congress - fiscal conservatives.
Just using Clinton as an example vs Bush I and Bush II...Patters and I had discussed that for the GOP to say they are the fiscal conservatives will be tough. The GOP can say it was the war and maybe some will buy it...but Bush has approved every spending bill to go by his desk that was non-war related.

Well we know how elections are spun so who knows where it will go...but for me...I currently see the democrats to be more fiscally conservative than the republicans.
IcyPatriot is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:51 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2

© Copyright 2000-2012. PatsFans.com Is a Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties.
The opinions posted in this forum do not necessarily reflect the opinions of our staff at PatsFans.com or USA Today.
We are not affiliated with the New England Patriots™ or the NFL™. The Photo Used In the header was taken by Ian Logue.

This site is owned and operated by I&K Internet Design Enterprises, LLC