More incompetence by the Bush administration - New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard
NEWS
|
FORUM
|
PHOTOS
|
VIDEOS
|
FULL STATS DATABASE
|
PODCAST
|
RUMOR MILL
Get Social With PatsFans.com
Early Roster Projection
Ryan's Journey Started Early
POST DRAFT PODCAST

Go Back   New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard > Off Topic Forums > Political Discussion
Forgot Password? Join PatsFans.com!
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Arcade Mark Forums Read Chat Room

WELCOME TO OUR FORUM HERE AT PATSFANS.COM!
ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW

Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-24-2006, 12:54 PM   #1
Moderator
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 16,357
My Mood: Mellow
Default More incompetence by the Bush administration

The same administration that has seen close to 6,000 Americans killed by terrorists during their watch has security procedures that enabled an employee to download and bring home personal data about 26.5 million veterans! It amazes me that that kind of information could be downloaded in such quantity without red flags going up all over the place. This administration is amateur hour, and this time the joke is on the veterans.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/vets26_million_ids

WASHINGTON - Under intense bipartisan fire from Capitol Hill, Veterans Affairs Secretary Jim Nicholson said Wednesday he was outraged by his agency's decision to keep the theft of veterans' personal data quiet for two weeks.

...

"I am outraged at the loss of this veterans' data and the fact an employee would put it at risk by taking it home in violation of our policies," he said. "Upon notification, my first priority was to take all actions necessary to protect veterans from harm."

...

Nicholson's remarks come amid growing outrage from lawmakers over the theft, which involved the birthdates and Social Security numbers of 26.5 million veterans. The VA employee had taken the information home without authorization.
Patters is offline   Reply With Quote
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!

Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account
including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.

NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98

Updated 07/08/11

Help Us Reach Our Goal!

Old 05-24-2006, 01:05 PM   #2
Banned
 
QuiGon's Avatar
 

Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 6,123
Default

I am not defending the administration or the people responsible but there's one thing you people need to know:

This sort of thing happens all the time in all levels of business and government. You wouldn't believe me if I ever told just how unsecure all your personal data is. Just a couple of months ago the Boston Globe delivered the credit card information of their subscribers to everyone in the Worcester area.

Trust me when I say these sorts of things happen ALL THE TIME. And for every one you know about, there's about a dozen you don't.

Anyone that doesn't monitor their own credit report regularly is a fool.
QuiGon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-24-2006, 01:13 PM   #3
ELOrocks17
Guest
 

Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Patters
The same administration that has seen close to 6,000 Americans killed by terrorists during their watch has security procedures that enabled an employee to download and bring home personal data about 26.5 million veterans! It amazes me that that kind of information could be downloaded in such quantity without red flags going up all over the place. This administration is amateur hour, and this time the joke is on the veterans.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/vets26_million_ids

WASHINGTON - Under intense bipartisan fire from Capitol Hill, Veterans Affairs Secretary Jim Nicholson said Wednesday he was outraged by his agency's decision to keep the theft of veterans' personal data quiet for two weeks.

...

"I am outraged at the loss of this veterans' data and the fact an employee would put it at risk by taking it home in violation of our policies," he said. "Upon notification, my first priority was to take all actions necessary to protect veterans from harm."

...

Nicholson's remarks come amid growing outrage from lawmakers over the theft, which involved the birthdates and Social Security numbers of 26.5 million veterans. The VA employee had taken the information home without authorization.
Well Patters, i see you attended the NEM school of conspiracy threads. This is something i would expect him to post. Bush is fighting 2 wars, Still helping with Katrina and Wilma, now New England is under water, Nuclear threats from Iran. But through all of that, it is your opinion that he has the time and the inclination to make sure the VA database is secure. Give me a friggin break.
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-24-2006, 01:15 PM   #4
B.O. = Fugazi
 
BelichickFan's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 30,556
Send a message via AIM to BelichickFan
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ELOrocks17
Well Patters, i see you attended the NEM school of conspiracy threads. This is something i would expect him to post. Bush is fighting 2 wars, Still helping with Katrina and Wilma, now New England is under water, Nuclear threats from Iran. But through all of that, it is your opinion that he has the time and the inclination to make sure the VA database is secure. Give me a friggin break.
Everything is Bush's fault. Jesus, get with the program will you
BelichickFan is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 05-24-2006, 01:24 PM   #5
Experienced Starter w/First Big Contract
 

Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 6,543
Default

I'm sure the same computer system was in place while Clinton was in office and the same exact thing could have happened. Unfortunately what Qui Gon said is completely right - most computer systems used internally (by employees) are not adequately secured. I work as a database & reporting analyst, and in almost every company I've worked* for it would have been trivial for me to walk out with a disk containing every credit card number that every customer has ever used. It doesn't make it right, but nor is it a good example of Bush's incompetence.

Last edited by Pujo; 05-24-2006 at 01:27 PM..
Pujo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-24-2006, 01:26 PM   #6
Moderator
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 16,357
My Mood: Mellow
Default

How low do you need to set the bar to exonerate this administration for failures during its watch? It's not responsible for 9/11. It's not responsible for the bad intelligence that sent us into Iraq. It's not responsible for the failure of FEMA during Katrina. It's not responsible for the loss of 26.5 million personal records of veterans. Do you know what responsible means? It means that when something good or bad happens while you're in charge, you get the credit or the blame. Bush is in charge. Bush is responsible. You might argue that some things are beyond his control (and I would agree, given that his brain was probably damaged due to alcoholism and drugs), but he is still in charge. He needs to appoint people who make the government work. Today's Republicans apparently don't know the meaning of responsibility. What a shame.
Patters is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-24-2006, 01:29 PM   #7
Experienced Starter w/First Big Contract
 

Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 6,543
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Patters
How low do you need to set the bar to exonerate this administration for failures during its watch? It's not responsible for 9/11. It's not responsible for the bad intelligence that sent us into Iraq. It's not responsible for the failure of FEMA during Katrina. It's not responsible for the loss of 26.5 million personal records of veterans. Do you know what responsible means? It means that when something good or bad happens while you're in charge, you get the credit or the blame. Bush is in charge. Bush is responsible. You might argue that some things are beyond his control (and I would agree, given that his brain was probably damaged due to alcoholism and drugs), but he is still in charge. He needs to appoint people who make the government work. Today's Republicans apparently don't know the meaning of responsibility. What a shame.
Too mixed of a bag, Patters.

They're not responsible for 9/11.
They are responsible for lying about Iraq (forget faulty intelligence, they knew the score before they went in there).
They are partially responsible for the Katrina response.
They are distantly responsible for the records being stolen (in the sense that blame should always go to the top).

And they're responsible for a lot more, but the VA records being stolen is a stretch.

Last edited by Pujo; 05-24-2006 at 01:30 PM..
Pujo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-24-2006, 01:29 PM   #8
On The Game Day Roster
 
jeffd's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 336
My Mood: Amazed
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BelichickFan
Everything is Bush's fault. Jesus, get with the program will you
I stubbed my toe this morning... Bush sucks.
jeffd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-24-2006, 01:31 PM   #9
B.O. = Fugazi
 
BelichickFan's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 30,556
Send a message via AIM to BelichickFan
Default

I can't wait for the next (D) President so we can blame him for every little thing that happens. This "it happened on Bush's watch" thing has gone WAY too far.
BelichickFan is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 05-24-2006, 01:37 PM   #10
Banned
 
QuiGon's Avatar
 

Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 6,123
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pujo
Too mixed of a bag, Patters.

They're not responsible for 9/11.
They are responsible for lying about Iraq (forget faulty intelligence, they knew the score before they went in there).
They are partially responsible for the Katrina response.
They are distantly responsible for the records being stolen (in the sense that blame should always go to the top).

And they're responsible for a lot more, but the VA records being stolen is a stretch.
I gotta give Pujo credit... I don't agree with everything he writes and I am sure he doesn't agree with everything I write, but he could be the single most level-headed, non-partisan person in this group. I respect that
QuiGon is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:47 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2

© Copyright 2000-2012. PatsFans.com Is a Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties.
The opinions posted in this forum do not necessarily reflect the opinions of our staff at PatsFans.com or USA Today.
We are not affiliated with the New England Patriots™ or the NFL™. The Photo Used In the header was taken by Ian Logue.

This site is owned and operated by I&K Internet Design Enterprises, LLC