ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW
Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!
So, it's back to the heinous charge of lying to a grand jury for Libby
NEM et. al. proven wrong 1001 th time
It's incredible that an accusation is just an accusation when it is directed at a Repub, until proven; and yet when directed against their enemies, mud is Gospel. This is a pathetic attempt to spread blame, and it is not yet proven.
Saying that you will produce witnesses is not quite the same as having witnesses actually testify under oath in acourt of law and the judge / jury believe them.
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!
Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.
NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98
It's incredible that an accusation is just an accusation when it is directed at a Repub, until proven; and yet when directed against their enemies, mud is Gospel.
That goes both ways, on this board especially. So it would not be accurate to just throw the Republicans into that statement.
__________________
Hey, Bill you're wasting Brady's prime years......oh wait.... To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
It's incredible that an accusation is just an accusation when it is directed at a Repub, until proven; and yet when directed against their enemies, mud is Gospel. This is a pathetic attempt to spread blame, and it is not yet proven.
Saying that you will produce witnesses is not quite the same as having witnesses actually testify under oath in acourt of law and the judge / jury believe them.
Uh, you and NEM DO know that the Libby trial is NOT about the alleged 'outing' of plame, don't you? As others have said, it is about obstruction of justice. Sad to say a rather common crime in Washington circles for decades.
Come on now folks this discussion is over a NEWSMAX article, do you think it is a tad biased??? This whole thing needs to be validated from another source before it warrants this much discussion. Do you expect NEWSMAX to accept that Libby or his boss did anything wrong?? Even if he is ever brought to trial and found guilty, it will be someone elses fault. Karl Rove has taught his students well, when it comes time to blame the person who did it, distract, throw out some names, phony witnesses and always lie.
__________________ "Being the best doesn't mean you always win. It just means you win more than anyone else".. tweet from Kurt Warner to Tom Brady.
Uh, you and NEM DO know that the Libby trial is NOT about the alleged 'outing' of plame, don't you? As others have said, it is about obstruction of justice. Sad to say a rather common crime in Washington circles for decades.
So, we should not prosecute obstruction of justice? Also, it maybe that the reason that the charge is obstruction of justice versus the more serious charge is it is very hard to get a conviction. Tell me your stance would be just as firm if the party affiliation was reversed.
So, we should not prosecute obstruction of justice? Also, it maybe that the reason that the charge is obstruction of justice versus the more serious charge is it is very hard to get a conviction. Tell me your stance would be just as firm if the party affiliation was reversed.
Where did I say that? Yet another strawman attempt at arguement.
Please, learn to read without applying an ideological bias, reading gawd knows what into a post.
Where did I say that? Yet another strawman attempt at arguement.
Please, learn to read without applying an ideological bias, reading gawd knows what into a post.
My bad. It is very easy to read something into a post or a response. My take was that you were either defending the party being tried, or were downplaying the trial. Honestly, where do you stand?
My bad. It is very easy to read something into a post or a response. My take was that you were either defending the party being tried, or were downplaying the trial. Honestly, where do you stand?
OK
I say that if Libby obstructed justice which it looks like he did, he should pay the penalty. I am attempting to clarify that nobody has been charged with outing Plame as many of the leftists have been crowing over here for ages.
If an admin official DID violate the law by outing her, then that official should also pay the penalty.
My problem is that we're weak and too accepting of obstruction of justice and security violations. I had a Secret clearance and it was made clear to me in no uncertain terms that deliberate misconduct would result in jail. Should be the same penalty for the beautiful people.