Quote:
Originally Posted by PatsSB42
I guess if I can be sarcastic, you can too.  The larger point behind mine is that gay marriage is not all that black and white an issue of liberals for conservatives. You simply can't say liberal=tolerant and conservative=bigot. Asked point blank in the presidential campaign, all 4 presidents and vice presidential candidates said they believe that marriage is between one man and one woman. While I do not detect glee from you at the thought of them dying off it, you do seem to express some sort of comfort or relief at the notion. The problem is many good caring people living today have honest, deep religious or personal convictions that form their beliefs on many subjects. Will the beliefs you happen to agree with them on die off with them too?
|
You are absolutely right, on all of this.
Quote:
Originally Posted by PatsSB42
... You simply can't say liberal=tolerant and conservative=bigot. ...
|
Of course not (and I haven't). In fact, in an earlier conversation, perhaps on this topic, I realized that I was applying the bigot label incorrectly and admitted that. I do think most if not all opposed to gay marriage are showing prejudice, but that doesn't make them bigots (though many certainly are -- as indicated earlier in this thread, for example).
Quote:
Originally Posted by PatsSB42
...Asked point blank in the presidential campaign, all 4 presidents and vice presidential candidates said they believe that marriage is between one man and one woman. ...
|
Personally, I think Obama is either fundamentally wrong on the issue or he is doing what he believes to be politically expedient. Unless the latter is actually a ploy of some sort (which I'm not giving him the benefit of the doubt on), he is being weak. Either way (wrong or weak), I consider it one of many things I've disliked about his presidency thus far.
(and to the earlier point re bigotry v prejudice, of the 4 Pres/VP candidates, my sense is that 3 of the 4 are not bigots - though they're prejudiced on this matter)
Quote:
Originally Posted by PatsSB42
....While I do not detect glee from you at the thought of them dying off it, you do seem to express some sort of comfort or relief at the notion. ...
|
Ah, now that is a much more accurate read. I'm not sure if those are precisely the terms, that's the general idea -- I guess how I actually view it is something good resulting from something that is inevitable.
Quote:
Originally Posted by PatsSB42
.... The problem is many good caring people living today have honest, deep religious or personal convictions that form their beliefs on many subjects. Will the beliefs you happen to agree with them on die off with them too?
|
Perhaps, but I'm not aware of any beliefs of that type that are so clearly delineated by age.
I guess I see a couple issues with the "good people" concept, though. First, I agree that there are probably many seemingly good people who have deep convictions on this. However, some of those people probably are bigots. Just as with the case of race, otherwise "good" people can harbor pretty disgusting views on various matters.
Beyond them, however, are those people who actually are pretty good people, but for whatever reason, they have an issue not so much with homosexuals as with gay marriage. But I have yet to hear any substance behind their objections. It's purely subjective and often emotional. Yes, those views may often be due to religion, but marriage isn't solely a religious institution in our country.
Personally, I say we should get government out of marriage entirely. Leave marriage to religious institutions or as a private matter. Replace the government institution currently known as "marriage" with civil union, for both heterosexual and homosexual couples.
-------------------------
By the way, are you opposed to gay marriage (marriage as legal institution, to be clear)? If so, can you provide any legitimate rationale for the government only to recognize heterosexual couples as being married?