Chimp finds his Veto Stamp. - Page 2 - New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard
Men's Apparel Jerseys Hats Novelties Throwback Women's Youth
 
REGISTER FOR PATSFANS.COM

Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!


Go Back   New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard > Off Topic Forums > Political Discussion
Forgot Password? Join PatsFans.com!
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Arcade Mark Forums Read Chat Room

WELCOME TO OUR FORUM HERE AT PATSFANS.COM!
ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW

Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-22-2006, 08:16 AM   #11
Moderator
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 16,343
My Mood: Mellow
Default

PFIEL, I think lefties are saying that none of the ports should be run by any foreign entity. It's the righties who are saying they shouldn't be run by Arabs. Or am I wrong? Do you think the British and Chinese should be alowed to run some of our ports (which is currently the case), even though the port security is still apparently quite porous? I think our ports should be nationalized or at least run by American companies until we set up standards to ensure adequate security. It's hard to set up those standards when other nations are running the ports.
Patters is offline   Reply With Quote
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!

Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account
including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.

NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98

Updated 07/08/11

Help Us Reach Our Goal!

Old 02-22-2006, 08:19 AM   #12
In the Starting Line-up
 
All_Around_Brown's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 3,098
My Mood: Inspired
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PatsFanInEaglesLand
Well I agree that the ports shouldn't be sold to UAE, but you lefties are a bunch of hypocrites. This is exactly what we should be doing country/ethnic/racial profiling. But as soon as an arab person is pulled out of line at an airport your buddies the ACLU throw a ***** fit. So have a little consistency.
Yeah, you tell em.
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
All_Around_Brown is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2006, 08:23 AM   #13
Experienced Starter w/First Big Contract
 

Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 6,542
Default

What especially makes the UAE case troubling is that it's a STATE-OWNED company. At least a British company is not owned by the government.
Pujo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2006, 08:26 AM   #14
Look Up, It's Amazing
 
Harry Boy's Avatar
 

Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 33,813
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by All_Around_Brown
BTW...if you wonder why the right would characterize all muslims as savages, listen to Coulter, Hannity, O'REilly, Rush and the rest of the Bush propagandists...and you'll figure it out pretty quickly. Purveyors of fear.
Because it is the Terrorists and Radicals in "THEIR RELIGION" that attacked our country and slaughtered 3000 human beings in two hours, because it is the people in their Religion that are Rampaging in the world and demanding "DEATH TO AMERICA"

HOW MANY OF THE GOOD MUSLIMS* THAT THE LIBERALS ARE ALWAYS BLEATING ABOUT HAVE YOU SEEN GO PUBLIC AND CONDEM ANYTHING THE BLOODTHIRSTY B-STARDS HAVE DONE, (BEHEADING ON TV, BURNING DEAD AMERICAN BODIES AND THE BIGGEST OF ALL 9/11) WHERE THE HELL ARE THEY, WHEN ARE THEY GOING TO CONDEM THE SAVAGES AMONG THEM.

WHEN?????? GEORGE BUSH AND JIMMY CARTER ARE A COUPLE OF RATS.

I NEVER BELIEVED BUSH WOULD DO SOMETHING LIKE THIS, SOONER OR LATER IF THIS GOES THROUGH THE MUSLIMS* WILL HIT AGAIN, THEY WILL ENTER THROUGH THE ARAB PORT, THEY WILL NUKE AN AMERICAN CITY AND YOU WILL HEAR NOT ONE WORD OF CONDEMNATION FROM YOUR "GOOD ONES", THEY WILL HIDE IN THER MOSQUES, PRAISING THEIR GOD.
Harry Boy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2006, 08:49 AM   #15
Moderator
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 16,343
My Mood: Mellow
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Harry Boy
HOW MANY OF THE GOOD MUSLIMS* THAT THE LIBERALS ARE ALWAYS BLEATING ABOUT HAVE YOU SEEN GO PUBLIC AND CONDEM ANYTHING THE BLOODTHIRSTY B-STARDS HAVE DONE, (BEHEADING ON TV, BURNING DEAD AMERICAN BODIES AND THE BIGGEST OF ALL 9/11) WHERE THE HELL ARE THEY, WHEN ARE THEY GOING TO CONDEM THE SAVAGES AMONG THEM.
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q...=Google+Search

Most Muslims are good people, Harry, Just use common sense. How many people do you know who even care about politics? Maybe a few percent of Americans, and the same is true among Muslims. Most people go about their merry way, and don't approve of the radicals for many reasons, including moral reasons and fear of the consequences. Among the few percent who are political, you have a combination of strong radicals and weak, corrupt government. If the moderates speak out, the government may not be able to protect them. That said, they do speak out, and the media really isn't very interested. Murder and destruction is far more newsworthy.
Patters is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2006, 08:55 AM   #16
In the Starting Line-up
 
PatsFanInEaglesLand's Avatar
 

Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Shillington, Pa
Posts: 3,511
My Mood: Cynical
Send a message via AIM to PatsFanInEaglesLand
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Patters
PFIEL, I think lefties are saying that none of the ports should be run by any foreign entity. It's the righties who are saying they shouldn't be run by Arabs. Or am I wrong? Do you think the British and Chinese should be alowed to run some of our ports (which is currently the case), even though the port security is still apparently quite porous? I think our ports should be nationalized or at least run by American companies until we set up standards to ensure adequate security. It's hard to set up those standards when other nations are running the ports.
Funny I didn't hear one peep while the British owned the ports?

I agree they should be run by American companies, but this is racial profiling and it works.

Then again I could just imagine the reaction if Halliburton purchased these ports
PatsFanInEaglesLand is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2006, 09:20 AM   #17
Look Up, It's Amazing
 
Harry Boy's Avatar
 

Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 33,813
Default

This is one that Bush is going to lose, but he will make it look like he won, he will be forced to back down.

KEEP AMERICA SAFE -PROFILE MIDDLE EASTERN LOOKING MEN BECAUSE OUR ENEMY IS "MIDDLE EASTERN LOOKING MEN"

OUR ENEMY ARE NOT BLONDE CLEAN SHAVEN PRESBYTARIANS OR SOUTHERN BAPTISTS.

WOULDN'T IT BE NICE IF THE "GOOD MUSLIMS"* ORGANIZED A MARCH ON WASHINGTON DEMANDING THAT THE TERRORIST DOGS AMONG THEM STOP THE SAVAGERY AND STOP KILLING IN THE NAME OF THEIR GOD.

MAYBE AS A SHOWING OF SOLIDARITY KENNEDY PELOSI JESSIE AND SHARPTON COULD LEAD THEM.
Harry Boy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2006, 03:36 PM   #18
All Pro Poster
 
wistahpatsfan's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 15,607
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PatsFanInMaine
Could we at least have debate on this issue without reffering the UAE as "Savages". What information do you base the UAR as being "Savages". Is it simply because the are of Muslim decent?
IMO, we can have a debate on this, but there is not enough time and this has to be stopped. What is there to debate about? I began this thread as trying to ask why anyone had any idea why Bush cannot let Congress say no to him, even though there is sure to be an override. Then what does he do, issue an executive order to circumvent an act of Congress? Then what? This is quickly becoming the chrystallizing point of the struggle for unlimited executive branch power.

Nice try on the "bigotry angle" talking point. They must have been up all night getting that one out to their minions. I don't know anybody from the UAE. I wasn't referring to them. I was referring to the backstabbers who are the elite members of the government and the government-run businesses. There is no disconnect from this entity that purchased the British company and the government of the UAE. These men (and I say men because I'll go out on a limb and say there probably aren't any women in powerful positions in this democratic Shangri-La) will do whatever it takes to advance themselves financially and gain prestige in the community of Islamic - Arab nations. THEY ARE NOT OUR FRIENDS !

I not so foolish to think that this government in any way reflects the mind of the average UAE-er. This is not about them. The traitors in the white house would like you to believe that, though.
wistahpatsfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2006, 04:35 PM   #19
Look Up, It's Amazing
 
Harry Boy's Avatar
 

Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 33,813
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by NEM
My thoughts exactly. This is a setup by the administration to help the 2006 elections...... allthought out and done by rove and company...and, as usual, the Dems will be caught with their pants down.
This will help the Dems and devastate the Republicans because the republicans will stay home, they won't vote, they are disgusted with this Arab/Port thing, they are even further disgusted to find out that a Sniveling little weasle like Jimmy Carter is actually on Bush's side with this.

Bush Has Cracked Up, they should get ready to have his head examined.

The Bin Laden gang must be getting quite a kick out of all this.
Harry Boy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2006, 05:39 PM   #20
All Pro Poster
 
wistahpatsfan's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 15,607
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PatsFanInEaglesLand
Funny I didn't hear one peep while the British owned the ports?

I agree they should be run by American companies, but this is racial profiling and it works.

Then again I could just imagine the reaction if Halliburton purchased these ports
So I can pen you in as the one who thinks this a good idea?

I'd take Halliburton over these guys. I'd rather lose money than lose Baltimore.
wistahpatsfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Sponsored Links



Thread Tools
Display Modes


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:41 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2

© Copyright 2000-2012. PatsFans.com Is a Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties.
The opinions posted in this forum do not necessarily reflect the opinions of our staff at PatsFans.com or USA Today.
We are not affiliated with the New England Patriots™ or the NFL™. The Photo Used In the header was taken by Ian Logue.

This site is owned and operated by I&K Internet Design Enterprises, LLC