02-20-2006, 11:28 AM
|
#10
|
|
All Pro Poster
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 15,621
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Patters
I think this is a political game on both sides. The question I have is why would Bush put this idea out there? He must have known it would play perfectly into the Democratic playbook, so I suspect he's up to something. If Clinton was President, I'd be okay with Dubai running the ports, but having Bush and gang negotiate the contract will leave our country neither more secure nor richer. Someone bad will make a bundle of dough in this deal.
|
I wouldn't be OK with this if George Washington was president (well, maybe him, but not anyone else). Patters, you're really showing off your biased chubber for the Clinton admin, here. You'd "be okay with Dubai running the ports"? Are you nuts? These animals would stab us in the back for money and you know it. This is a matter of national security if there ever was one, and you'd leave it up to our enemies?
Excuse me, I have to apply for a new job in Colorado. It's gonna suck to have to fly in for Pats games. Duck and Cover you east coasters!
|
|
|