What is the Bush Administration thinking here? - New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard
NEWS
|
FORUM
|
PHOTOS
|
VIDEOS
|
FULL STATS DATABASE
|
PODCAST
|
RUMOR MILL
Get Social With PatsFans.com
Early Roster Projection
Ryan's Journey Started Early
POST DRAFT PODCAST

Go Back   New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard > Off Topic Forums > Political Discussion
Forgot Password? Join PatsFans.com!
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Arcade Mark Forums Read Chat Room

WELCOME TO OUR FORUM HERE AT PATSFANS.COM!
ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW

Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-16-2006, 06:59 PM   #1
Second Team and Threatening Starter's Job
 
Turd Furguson's Avatar
 

Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,245
Default What is the Bush Administration thinking here?

Contrary to popular belief, I do NOT march in total lockstep with the Bush administration. The border is the main issue I feel they are lacking in.

This is another and is potentially as dangerous if not, more so;

http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/02/....ap/index.html

Companies in the United Arab Emirates controlling 6 American ports?

Lets review the UAE for a second shall we?

UAE is in favor of increased trading with Iran

UAE still recognizes the Taliban as the official government of Afghanistan

UAE still REFUSES to recognize the state of Israel.

I cant believe I'm siding with Chuck Shumer on this issue but the potential is mindblowingly dangerous.

Bush better get off his ass and ixnay this deal.
Turd Furguson is offline   Reply With Quote
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!

Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account
including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.

NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98

Updated 07/08/11

Help Us Reach Our Goal!

Old 02-16-2006, 08:29 PM   #2
In the Starting Line-up
 
All_Around_Brown's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 3,098
My Mood: Inspired
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Turd Furguson
Contrary to popular belief, I do NOT march in total lockstep with the Bush administration. The border is the main issue I feel they are lacking in.

This is another and is potentially as dangerous if not, more so;

http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/02/....ap/index.html

Companies in the United Arab Emirates controlling 6 American ports?

Lets review the UAE for a second shall we?

UAE is in favor of increased trading with Iran

UAE still recognizes the Taliban as the official government of Afghanistan

UAE still REFUSES to recognize the state of Israel.

I cant believe I'm siding with Chuck Shumer on this issue but the potential is mindblowingly dangerous.

Bush better get off his ass and ixnay this deal.
Good post, and I totally agree. This is absurd. And since you do not march in lockstep with Bush anymore, you may also want to find fault in their completel non-commitment when it comes to not only securing the ports and analyzing the contents of shipments coming into them, you may also want to look further into the complete lack of acknowledging the safety and security of chemical, biological, and nuclear facilities in the US post-911.

In all of these areas...this administration has failed miserably in doing anything about national security.

http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/...l-plants_x.htm
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2003/...in583528.shtml

Quote:
The Wall Street Journal (8/20/04) revealed that the Bush administration has down-sized the number of high priority chemical plants identified by the EPA as vulnerable. According to the EPA, more than 100 chemical plants put a million or more people at risk. The DHS cut that list down to “two” claiming that their disaster model is “more lethal” and realistic. The DHS’s new ranking reduces the overall universe of chemical facilities that threaten 1,000 or more people by 43 percent. This will ignore more than 3,000 plants.
http://www.citizen.org/pressroom/release.cfm?ID=1810
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
All_Around_Brown is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2006, 05:15 AM   #3
Second Team and Threatening Starter's Job
 
Turd Furguson's Avatar
 

Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,245
Default

I agree AAB, this has the potential to be explosive. Pun intended.

And just for clarification, I NEVER marched in total lockstep with the BA.
Turd Furguson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2006, 06:26 AM   #4
PatsFans.com Supporter
 
DarrylS's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: In a very special place
Posts: 36,169
My Mood: Psychedelic
Default

If Bush ixnays this deal will he alienate the oil industry??

This whole thing troubles me, another system outsourced to a foreign country, I shudder to think what this country will be like in 20 years with the Japanese influence on the West Coast and the European influence on the East Coast, the problems with our southern borders. I am not an isolationist, however think that we have been missing the boat for quite a long time now. Need to develop a consistent policy that will reflect the long term best interest of this country, not an immediate need.

When I read this I always question who is getting the big pay day, not sure whom, but will probably find out in about 7 or 8 years from now after something happens that will effect our national security and there is a subsequent investigation.
__________________
"Being the best doesn't mean you always win. It just means you win more than anyone else".. tweet from Kurt Warner to Tom Brady.
DarrylS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2006, 03:28 PM   #5
Second Team and Threatening Starter's Job
 
Turd Furguson's Avatar
 

Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,245
Default

Its not the outsourcing that worries me, its the fact that UAE is on fairly good terms with a country like Iran and could be the conduit to getting an Iranian nuke into this port without us having any idea that its there until too late.
Turd Furguson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2006, 04:07 PM   #6
In the Starting Line-up
 
All_Around_Brown's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 3,098
My Mood: Inspired
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Turd Furguson
Its not the outsourcing that worries me, its the fact that UAE is on fairly good terms with a country like Iran and could be the conduit to getting an Iranian nuke into this port without us having any idea that its there until too late.
Yup. If this goes through, we need to storm washington with torches and pitchforks. They will have sold out our national security evn worse than they already have.
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
All_Around_Brown is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2006, 04:36 PM   #7
Second Team and Threatening Starter's Job
 
Turd Furguson's Avatar
 

Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,245
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by All_Around_Brown
Yup. If this goes through, we need to storm washington with torches and pitchforks. They will have sold out our national security evn worse than they already have.
I have to say that this is REALLY REALLY bad and I cannot and will not back the Prez on this.

I also need to see what Congress thinks about this as well. Are they ALL selling us out to the highest bidder?
Turd Furguson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2006, 04:57 PM   #8
Look Up, It's Amazing
 
Harry Boy's Avatar
 

Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 33,816
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Turd Furguson
Contrary to popular belief, I do NOT march in total lockstep with the Bush administration. The border is the main issue I feel they are lacking in.

This is another and is potentially as dangerous if not, more so;

http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/02/....ap/index.html

Companies in the United Arab Emirates controlling 6 American ports?

Lets review the UAE for a second shall we?

UAE is in favor of increased trading with Iran

UAE still recognizes the Taliban as the official government of Afghanistan

UAE still REFUSES to recognize the state of Israel.

I cant believe I'm siding with Chuck Shumer on this issue but the potential is mindblowingly dangerous.

Bush better get off his ass and ixnay this deal.
I too part company with Bush on the Illegal Aliens and now he comes up with this Arab Port deal, these people no matter how friendly they may appear are no friends of the USA.

Speaking of the Illegal Aliens, the liberal Democrats never seem to knock Bush on this subject. Could it be that Bush is actually a Liberal Democrat when it comes to the criminal sneak in alien.
Harry Boy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2006, 05:35 PM   #9
All Pro Poster
 
wistahpatsfan's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 15,614
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Turd Furguson
I have to say that this is REALLY REALLY bad and I cannot and will not back the Prez on this.

I also need to see what Congress thinks about this as well. Are they ALL selling us out to the highest bidder?
Turd,
I know I've had my differences with you on the Occupation of Iraq and other stuff, as well as agreeing with you on a lot of social issues, but I'm realy glad to see your post on this issue. If a hard-core Bush supporter can see the cracks in the chimp's integrity, then there's hope for the country. I'm a Reagan Democrat that now has come to the realization that the 2-party system is rotten to the core and BOTH parties are so prone to corruption that the status quo is unbearable. This UAE contract has to be the last straw or we're all in deep shyte.
wistahpatsfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2006, 05:53 PM   #10
Second Team and Threatening Starter's Job
 
Turd Furguson's Avatar
 

Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,245
Default

The leadership of both parties have pretty much focused on doing only what it takes to get 45% of the American people to vote for them. Nothing more.


We're a rudderless ship in terms of the R & D leadership because they know there is no alternative. What are we going to get, another Ross Perot and Admiral Stockdale?
Turd Furguson is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:51 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2

© Copyright 2000-2012. PatsFans.com Is a Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties.
The opinions posted in this forum do not necessarily reflect the opinions of our staff at PatsFans.com or USA Today.
We are not affiliated with the New England Patriots™ or the NFL™. The Photo Used In the header was taken by Ian Logue.

This site is owned and operated by I&K Internet Design Enterprises, LLC