Does anyone still doubt Iran is a threat? - New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard
NEWS
|
FORUM
|
PHOTOS
|
VIDEOS
|
FULL STATS DATABASE
|
PODCAST
|
RUMOR MILL
Get Social With PatsFans.com
Early Roster Projection
Ryan's Journey Started Early
POST DRAFT PODCAST

Go Back   New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard > Off Topic Forums > Political Discussion
Forgot Password? Join PatsFans.com!
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Arcade Mark Forums Read Chat Room

WELCOME TO OUR FORUM HERE AT PATSFANS.COM!
ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW

Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-16-2006, 06:55 PM   #1
Second Team and Threatening Starter's Job
 
Turd Furguson's Avatar
 

Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,245
Default Does anyone still doubt Iran is a threat?

http://www.cnn.com/2006/WORLD/meast/...nce/index.html

Even the French are realizing the truth.

The big question is, what happens next? Does the world community at large sit back and let Iran develop a nuclear weapon?
Turd Furguson is offline   Reply With Quote
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!

Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account
including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.

NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98

Updated 07/08/11

Help Us Reach Our Goal!

Old 02-16-2006, 07:57 PM   #2
In the Starting Line-up
 
shirtsleeve's Avatar
 

Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: stuck at work
Posts: 2,730
Default

Nope, dont doubt it at all. Be scared. Be very, very scared.
shirtsleeve is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2006, 12:39 AM   #3
Banned
 
Terry Glenn is a cowgirl's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 7,883
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Turd Furguson
http://www.cnn.com/2006/WORLD/meast/...nce/index.html

Even the French are realizing the truth.

The big question is, what happens next? Does the world community at large sit back and let Iran develop a nuclear weapon?
Actually, Russia is holding Iran's hand...but then again. Whatever I say is just a wacko alert.
Terry Glenn is a cowgirl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2006, 05:20 AM   #4
Second Team and Threatening Starter's Job
 
Turd Furguson's Avatar
 

Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,245
Default

Oh I dont doubt that. Putin is definately in bed with Iran. That could foul things up with the UN Security Council. Then again SOMETHING always fouls things up in the UN Security Council.
Turd Furguson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2006, 05:55 AM   #5
Moderator
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 16,343
My Mood: Mellow
Default

Iran became a threat as a result of the Iraq war. It had a fairly moderate government but the people, afraid of the United States, voted in an extremist government. If you scare people enough, they will elect fools as leaders, as we did. Further, Iran is a more serious threat because we took out their biggest regional enemy, Iraq, and are helping to unify the Shiite population of the region.

It's interesting that Bush hasn't even imposed unilateral sanctions on Iran yet. Maybe Rove is waiting until a more strategic time to stoke up the fear machine and rally the paranoid right.

That said, eventually something will have to be done, perhaps a targeted attack on Iran's nuclear facilities to slow down their program, but for now I agree with Rice's $75 million propaganda campaign, though I can't believe that amount of money is enough.
Patters is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2006, 05:57 AM   #6
Moderator
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 16,343
My Mood: Mellow
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Terry Glenn is a cowgirl
Actually, Russia is holding Iran's hand...but then again. Whatever I say is just a wacko alert.
Some people do react badly to your posts; but others find them curious and even interesting. Unlike the rest of us, you don't have a mainstream point of view, but that's what makes your posts refreshing.
Patters is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2006, 03:27 PM   #7
Second Team and Threatening Starter's Job
 
Turd Furguson's Avatar
 

Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,245
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Patters
Iran became a threat as a result of the Iraq war. It had a fairly moderate government but the people, afraid of the United States, voted in an extremist government. If you scare people enough, they will elect fools as leaders, as we did. Further, Iran is a more serious threat because we took out their biggest regional enemy, Iraq, and are helping to unify the Shiite population of the region.

It's interesting that Bush hasn't even imposed unilateral sanctions on Iran yet. Maybe Rove is waiting until a more strategic time to stoke up the fear machine and rally the paranoid right.

That said, eventually something will have to be done, perhaps a targeted attack on Iran's nuclear facilities to slow down their program, but for now I agree with Rice's $75 million propaganda campaign, though I can't believe that amount of money is enough.
I think thats unfair Patters. Iran did not just suddenly wake up the morning after the Iraq war began and said "Death to Israel, Death to America"

They've been a threat for some time now and their latest quest to jump start their nuclear program only now brings them to the forefront.

I believe that their populace (especially the youth) are more moderate but that the government has been run by the extremists.

I also believe that while Iran is a giant threat, look at the countries that surround them; Iraq, Afghanistan and Turkey, All countries that are now somewhat hostile towards them and/or have a U.S military presence.


I think Bush believes that the UN CANNOT ignore Iran's threat as it is much much clearer than Iraq's was. And their nuclear facilities are I believe, spaced out and even underground as they learned Iraq's lesson after Israel bombed their capabilities to hell.
Turd Furguson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2006, 03:41 PM   #8
Experienced Starter w/First Big Contract
 

Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Brighton, MA
Posts: 5,742
Default

Pretend that there's a sensible government in Iran for just a moment. In a little more than 10 years they have watched the USA's magnificent military slap their greatest enemy around like a red-headed step-child not once but twice. The enemy that they fought a 10 year war with that ended in a stalemate. Isn't a 10 year stalemate pretty conclusive evidence that the two combatants were evenly matched? And would it therefore be safe to say that since our military rolled over Iraq's like it wasn't even there mean that the same could happen to Iran at any time? Now ask yourself if it really seems so weird, so provocative that they want to acquire the one weapon that we can't defend against.
sdaniels7114 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2006, 04:06 PM   #9
In the Starting Line-up
 
All_Around_Brown's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 3,098
My Mood: Inspired
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sdaniels7114
Pretend that there's a sensible government in Iran for just a moment. In a little more than 10 years they have watched the USA's magnificent military slap their greatest enemy around like a red-headed step-child not once but twice. The enemy that they fought a 10 year war with that ended in a stalemate. Isn't a 10 year stalemate pretty conclusive evidence that the two combatants were evenly matched? And would it therefore be safe to say that since our military rolled over Iraq's like it wasn't even there mean that the same could happen to Iran at any time? Now ask yourself if it really seems so weird, so provocative that they want to acquire the one weapon that we can't defend against.
Errr...no. Iran would actually put up a defense, and a pretty tough one at that by all reasonable estimates. The Iraq we rolled through was a shell of its previous military as a reult of the Iran-Iraq war, not to mention the Gulf War and post-war inspections, sanctions and routine bombings of their air defenses.

Iran has had no such softening. BUt I think I get your point, and I agree. They fear the worst, have seen the worst next door, and are preparing for it.
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
All_Around_Brown is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2006, 04:19 PM   #10
Moderator
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 16,343
My Mood: Mellow
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Turd Furguson
I think thats unfair Patters. Iran did not just suddenly wake up the morning after the Iraq war began and said "Death to Israel, Death to America"

They've been a threat for some time now and their latest quest to jump start their nuclear program only now brings them to the forefront.

I believe that their populace (especially the youth) are more moderate but that the government has been run by the extremists. [

I also believe that while Iran is a giant threat, look at the countries that surround them; Iraq, Afghanistan and Turkey, all countries that are now somewhat hostile towards them and/or have a U.S military presence.

I think Bush believes that the UN CANNOT ignore Iran's threat as it is much much clearer than Iraq's was. And their nuclear facilities are I believe, spaced out and even underground as they learned Iraq's lesson after Israel bombed their capabilities to hell.
I agree with you, but Iran was making inroads towards moderation. Their last government was reasonably moderate, though hardliners still held control of the military and maybe the courts, so the moderates didn't really have that much power. The real solution to all this is an international treaty that denies any country the right to have nuclear weapons, but I don't think the big powers will give up their advantage. The key now is to take whatever diplomatic and nonmilitary steps we can to try to avoid a confrontation. So far we're doing that, and the fact that we're launching a propaganda campaign suggests to me that no military action is imminent.
Patters is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:53 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2

© Copyright 2000-2012. PatsFans.com Is a Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties.
The opinions posted in this forum do not necessarily reflect the opinions of our staff at PatsFans.com or USA Today.
We are not affiliated with the New England Patriots™ or the NFL™. The Photo Used In the header was taken by Ian Logue.

This site is owned and operated by I&K Internet Design Enterprises, LLC