Who will be the next Senate Minority Leader? - New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard
NEWS
|
FORUM
|
PHOTOS
|
VIDEOS
|
FULL STATS DATABASE
|
PODCAST
|
RUMOR MILL
Get Social With PatsFans.com
Five Thoughts On Tebow
'13 NFL Previews Are In
Tebow at QB? No Way

Go Back   New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard > Off Topic Forums > Political Discussion
Forgot Password? Join PatsFans.com!
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Arcade Mark Forums Read Chat Room

WELCOME TO OUR FORUM HERE AT PATSFANS.COM!
ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW

Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-09-2006, 03:52 PM   #1
Third String But Playing on Special Teams
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Maine & Washington, DC
Posts: 653
Default Who will be the next Senate Minority Leader?

Kerry? Kennedy? Feingold?

It appears as though Dirty Harry's ship is sinking.

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,184377,00.html
PatsFanInMaine is offline   Reply With Quote
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!

Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account
including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.

NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98

Updated 07/08/11

Help Us Reach Our Goal!

Old 02-09-2006, 04:43 PM   #2
Moderator
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 16,492
My Mood: Mellow
Default

Or Trent Lott.
Patters is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2006, 05:18 PM   #3
It's SIR Moderator to you
 
gomezcat's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: London, just off the Eastern Seaboard
Posts: 3,543
My Mood: Blah
Send a message via Skype™ to gomezcat
Default

to NEM and Patters. I vote for Tom de Lay. PFIM, Abramoff might take down a couple of Democrats- your side should be safe from the bloodletting, though. (Cough, splutter)
__________________
The blog of our recent trip to The States (September and October 2012):


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
gomezcat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2006, 05:29 PM   #4
In the Starting Line-up
 
All_Around_Brown's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 3,098
My Mood: Inspired
Default

If Reid is linked to Abramoff, I'd be very surprised. We'll see what traction this gets, but if I read the article carefully, it states that Reid took money from Indian Tribes which were also Abramoff clients...not that he took money directly from Abramoff.

Abramoff is closely tied to the Republicans. This is an ugly fact that FOX is trying to deflect. The strategy is to make it sound like everyone took money from Abramoff. The reality is that far more Republicans are going to be outed than Dems, including the very tip of the iceberg, Bush himself.



http://www.usatoday.com/news/washing...e_x.htm?csp=34

"Their refusal to release information is inexcusable," says Tom Fitton, president of conservative legal organization Judicial Watch. As a result, the scandal "is now in the White House." http://online.wsj.com/public/article..._20070208.html

Quote:

White House Silent on Abramoff Meetings
By Nedra Pickler
The Associated Press

Tuesday 17 January 2005

The White House is refusing to reveal details of tainted lobbyist Jack Abramoff's visits with President Bush's staff.

Abramoff had "a few staff-level meetings" at the Bush White House, presidential spokesman Scott McClellan said Tuesday. But he would not say with whom Abramoff met, which interests he was representing or how he got access to the White House.

Since Abramoff pleaded guilty two weeks ago to conspiracy, mail fraud and tax evasion charges in an influence-peddling scandal, McClellan has told reporters he was checking into Abramoff's meetings. "I'm making sure that I have a thorough report back to you on that," he said in his press briefing Jan. 5. "And I'll get that to you, hopefully very soon."

McClellan said Tuesday that he checked on it at reporters' requests, but wouldn't discuss the private staff-level meetings.

He has said Abramoff attended three Hanukkah receptions at the White House, but corrected himself Tuesday to say there were only two - in 2001 and 2002.

McClellan said Bush does not know Abramoff personally, although it's possible the two met at the holiday receptions.

Abramoff was one of Bush's top fundraisers, having brought in at least $100,000 for the Bush-Cheney '04 re-election campaign and earning the honorary title "pioneer." The campaign took $6,000 of the contributions - which came directly from Abramoff, his wife and one of the Indian tribes he represented - and donated it to the American Heart Association. But the campaign has not returned the rest of the money Abramoff raised.
Of course, Bush is saying he doesn't know this man. Is Bush lying?

PFinMe...theres some KoolAid missing from your cooler. (PS Is your buddy James Tobin serving his time yet?)
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Last edited by All_Around_Brown; 02-09-2006 at 05:34 PM..
All_Around_Brown is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2006, 05:31 PM   #5
In the Starting Line-up
 
All_Around_Brown's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 3,098
My Mood: Inspired
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gomezcat
to NEM and Patters. I vote for Tom de Lay. PFIM, Abramoff might take down a couple of Democrats- your side should be safe from the bloodletting, though. (Cough, splutter)
No chance. Delay will be resigning in disgrace in the very near future. Besides, he's in the House not Senate.
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
All_Around_Brown is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2006, 05:37 PM   #6
It's SIR Moderator to you
 
gomezcat's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: London, just off the Eastern Seaboard
Posts: 3,543
My Mood: Blah
Send a message via Skype™ to gomezcat
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by All_Around_Brown
No chance. Delay will be resigning in disgrace in the very near future. Besides, he's in the House not Senate.
I was being facetious!

I didn't realise he was in the House, sorry. I need to get round to understanding the difference at some point.
__________________
The blog of our recent trip to The States (September and October 2012):


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
gomezcat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2006, 05:41 PM   #7
In the Starting Line-up
 
All_Around_Brown's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 3,098
My Mood: Inspired
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gomezcat
I was being facetious!

I didn't realise he was in the House, sorry. I need to get round to understanding the difference at some point.
There are 2 senators per state = 100.

There is one representative for each district (subset of state based on population).

(I know you were joking BTW )
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Last edited by All_Around_Brown; 02-09-2006 at 05:42 PM..
All_Around_Brown is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2006, 05:45 PM   #8
It's SIR Moderator to you
 
gomezcat's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: London, just off the Eastern Seaboard
Posts: 3,543
My Mood: Blah
Send a message via Skype™ to gomezcat
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by All_Around_Brown
There are 2 senators per state = 100.

There is one representative for each district (subset of state based on population).

(I know you were joking BTW )
OK, thanks. I guess that makes senators more important(?).
__________________
The blog of our recent trip to The States (September and October 2012):


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
gomezcat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2006, 06:03 PM   #9
In the Starting Line-up
 
PatsFanInEaglesLand's Avatar
 

Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Shillington, Pa
Posts: 3,520
My Mood: Cynical
Send a message via AIM to PatsFanInEaglesLand
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gomezcat
OK, thanks. I guess that makes senators more important(?).
They think so.
PatsFanInEaglesLand is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-2006, 03:20 AM   #10
It's SIR Moderator to you
 
gomezcat's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: London, just off the Eastern Seaboard
Posts: 3,543
My Mood: Blah
Send a message via Skype™ to gomezcat
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PatsFanInEaglesLand
They think so.
LOL. Politicians with inflated egos? Who would have thought it?
__________________
The blog of our recent trip to The States (September and October 2012):


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
gomezcat is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:24 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2

© Copyright 2000-2012. PatsFans.com Is a Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties.
The opinions posted in this forum do not necessarily reflect the opinions of our staff at PatsFans.com or USA Today.
We are not affiliated with the New England Patriots™ or the NFL™. The Photo Used In the header was taken by Ian Logue.

This site is owned and operated by I&K Internet Design Enterprises, LLC


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566