ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW
Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!
Cheney's Company Providing Tainted Water to Troops
“The level of contamination was roughly 2x the normal contamination of untreated water from the Euphrates River,” Granger wrote in one of several documents. The Associated Press obtained the documents from Senate Democrats who are holding a public inquiry into the allegations Monday.
That is, 2x the water from the Euphrates which directly receives human waste! Halliburton should be under investigation, but of course this Congress won't look into their egregious abuses, their criminal accounting, or their shoddy provision of services to our troops. Why? Because the puppet master is holding stock options and anything bad fopr Halliburton is bad for the criminal Cheney. oh theres more...it went on for over a year, in secrecy...
“It is my opinion that the water source is without question contaminated with numerous micro-organisms, including Coliform bacteria,” Carter wrote. “There is little doubt that raw sewage is routinely dumped upstream of intake much less than the required 2 mile distance.
“Therefore, it is my conclusion that chlorination of our water tanks while certainly beneficial is not sufficient protection from parasitic exposure.”
Carter said he resigned in early April after Halliburton officials did not take any action to inform the camp population.
The water expert said he told company officials at the base that they would have to notify the military. “They told me it was none of my concern and to keep my mouth shut,” he said.
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Last edited by All_Around_Brown; 01-23-2006 at 07:15 AM..
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!
Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.
NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98
“The level of contamination was roughly [b]2x the normal contamination of untreated water from the Euphrates River...which directly receives human waste! Halliburton should be under investigation..."
"...The water expert said he told company officials at the base that they would have to notify the military. “They told me it was none of my concern and to keep my mouth shut,” he said.
Just in a purely objective way, all things being equal (that is: Dems and "liberals" = repubs and "conservatives"), why shouldn't a huge contract as Halliburton has, be under the most extreme scrutiny and subject to revocation for events like these? It seems they have total immunity because of the bogus claim that they are the only ones who can do the job. Why does Halliburton enjoy such a shield from oversight?
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
By itself, I could see this as an honest mistake. But considering...
1. Haliburton has a no-bid contract
2. The government is immediately defending them instead of conducting an actual investigation (the army was quoted as saying the claims are unsubstantiated).
It certainly shows the government has an agenda in keeping Haliburton employed.
The Dems have their favorite cronies, too (look at what Bechtel/Parsons is doing here in Boston on the Big Dig), and I would hope both of those gross abuses would evoke outrage from everyone here. These are our soldiers that rely on Haliburton!
Think Bechtel is primarily a democrat contributor? Think again.
The company also has several close associations with previous Republican administrations. George Shultz, secretary of state during the Reagan administration, is a current Bechtel director. Past Bechtel executives include Caspar Weinberger, appointed defense secretary by former President Ronald Reagan in 1980, and William Casey, a former CIA director. Riley Bechtel, the company's chairman and chief executive, was also recently appointed to President Bush's export council. http://www.pbs.org/newshour/updates/..._04-18-03.html
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Think Bechtel is primarily a democrat contributor? Think again.
The company also has several close associations with previous Republican administrations. George Shultz, secretary of state during the Reagan administration, is a current Bechtel director. Past Bechtel executives include Caspar Weinberger, appointed defense secretary by former President Ronald Reagan in 1980, and William Casey, a former CIA director. Riley Bechtel, the company's chairman and chief executive, was also recently appointed to President Bush's export council. http://www.pbs.org/newshour/updates/..._04-18-03.html
Yeah, when it comes to corruption everyone has their hand in the cookie jar.
The troops themselves. Every field unit has water buffalos (towed water storage) as well as bladders (used for non-potable water such as field showers). Drinking water, even at remote camps, is bottled water - the same as you get in most stores here in the US.
In fact, the major bases in Saudi, the UAE, Kuwait, and Qatar have the drinking water (bottled, as I said) provided by the host nation.