Signing Statements Point To Fascism - New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard
NEWS
|
FORUM
|
PHOTOS
|
VIDEOS
|
FULL STATS DATABASE
|
PODCAST
|
RUMOR MILL
Get Social With PatsFans.com
Early Roster Projection
Ryan's Journey Started Early
POST DRAFT PODCAST

Go Back   New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard > Off Topic Forums > Political Discussion
Forgot Password? Join PatsFans.com!
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Arcade Mark Forums Read Chat Room

WELCOME TO OUR FORUM HERE AT PATSFANS.COM!
ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW

Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-20-2006, 02:13 PM   #1
In the Starting Line-up
 
All_Around_Brown's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 3,098
My Mood: Inspired
Default Signing Statements Point To Fascism

http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/06020/641039.stm

What precedents we are setting for the future presidents to come. This law and that law no longer apply to the executive branch. By this measure, nothing Bush can do could be construed as illegal- there will be justification for all of it.

Explains why they have been breaking the law without remorse. Well that, in addition to having a Congress that refuses to do its oversight job.
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
All_Around_Brown is offline   Reply With Quote
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!

Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account
including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.

NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98

Updated 07/08/11

Help Us Reach Our Goal!

Old 01-20-2006, 02:27 PM   #2
Experienced Starter w/First Big Contract
 

Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 6,543
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by All_Around_Brown
http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/06020/641039.stm

What precedents we are setting for the future presidents to come. This law and that law no longer apply to the executive branch. By this measure, nothing Bush can do could be construed as illegal- there will be justification for all of it.

Explains why they have been breaking the law without remorse. Well that, in addition to having a Congress that refuses to do its oversight job.
The claim of absolute executive privelage is one that's been made many times before, all the way back to James Madison (Marbury v. Madison), later with the Truman steel mill seizure (Youngstown Co. v. Sawyer), again Richard Nixon (U.S. v. Nixon), through Clinton, and now Bush. And ultimately it's the courts that decide what's constitutional and what's not, and usually the courts correctly rule that executive power is NOT absolute.

The issue then always comes to how can the court enforce its order. Unfortunately, there's very little the court can do (they actually toyed with the idea of sending US Marshalls into the White House to seize the Watergate tapes, but then realized what kind of crisis that could cause). The fact that Bush has broken the law is crystal clear, but because only Congress can remove the President, and congress has no spine unless there is so much public pressure that congressmen and senators may loose their seats, it turns out that the President does have a blank check, except in the realm of public opinion. We are truly in danger of moving away from a constitutional government and toward a tyranny of the majority.

Last edited by Pujo; 01-20-2006 at 02:27 PM..
Pujo is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-20-2006, 03:23 PM   #3
In the Starting Line-up
 
PatsFanInEaglesLand's Avatar
 

Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Shillington, Pa
Posts: 3,511
My Mood: Cynical
Send a message via AIM to PatsFanInEaglesLand
Default

So what to do? You guys are convinced that the Republicans are Fascists and most people I know are scared to death of the Democrats turning this country into a socialist paradise.
PatsFanInEaglesLand is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-20-2006, 04:05 PM   #4
All Pro Poster
 
wistahpatsfan's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 15,621
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PatsFanInEaglesLand
So what to do? You guys are convinced that the Republicans are Fascists and most people I know are scared to death of the Democrats turning this country into a socialist paradise.
Lets all get together and build a fascist paradise!
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
wistahpatsfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-20-2006, 04:49 PM   #5
In the Starting Line-up
 
PatsFanInEaglesLand's Avatar
 

Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Shillington, Pa
Posts: 3,511
My Mood: Cynical
Send a message via AIM to PatsFanInEaglesLand
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by NEM
That is true, but not in our history has it been abused in the manner in which this administration has done.

I believe that Bush is a very sick man, that he has a serious power problem, that he is, for all intents and purposes, mentally unstable.

Whether it be from the alcohol intake or the drug intake, I have no idea, but this man is a severe danger to the survival of our country and to the entire world.

There is going to come a time, soon, when he will have to be stopped, one way or another (legally) before the planet is destroyed because of his sickness and his ineptness.
So what do you want to do? Elect all democrats. So we can have 50% taxes,open borders to illegals( although it is not like Bush gives a crap about that either), every employed person working for the government, rampant unionization so we can pay 8.00 for a loaf of bread. Lazy asses being taken care of cradle to grave? Teachers making 90k a year and have no accountability? Sounds a lot like Sweden with the backbone of Switzerland, nobody wants that except for maybe you.

All you give are insults never any suggestions, of course you are a democrat so what else is there to expect.
PatsFanInEaglesLand is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-20-2006, 05:06 PM   #6
In the Starting Line-up
 
All_Around_Brown's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 3,098
My Mood: Inspired
Default

What do we do? First we end the partisan attacks. Next we look at what our forefathers actually wrote. It is this, after all, that is supposed to be adhered to under any and all circumstances. They saw war in our nations future, and wrote specific binding laws to regulate abuses of power in war, as it is war that makes nations most vulnerable to collapse. They wrote clearly their intent to protect the government of the people by the people and for the people from such abuses. The words of the founding fathers are needed now more than ever. If there are high crimes and misdemeanors, let there be a trial, and jury, and punishment.
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
All_Around_Brown is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-20-2006, 06:38 PM   #7
In the Starting Line-up
 
shirtsleeve's Avatar
 

Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: stuck at work
Posts: 2,730
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by All_Around_Brown
What do we do? First we end the partisan attacks. Next we look at what our forefathers actually wrote. It is this, after all, that is supposed to be adhered to under any and all circumstances. They saw war in our nations future, and wrote specific binding laws to regulate abuses of power in war, as it is war that makes nations most vulnerable to collapse. They wrote clearly their intent to protect the government of the people by the people and for the people from such abuses. The words of the founding fathers are needed now more than ever. If there are high crimes and misdemeanors, let there be a trial, and jury, and punishment.
Yup. The answer can always, always be found there. The founding fathers knew of what they wrote in the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. A trial for high crimes and misdemeanors may be in order here. 'cept it wont happen. America, and I mean middle America, not The People's Republic of Massachusetts here, is not that upset by this. These polls that show favor of impeachment are slanted, because they predominantly poll the most populated areas. These large population centers are very democratic. This is due largely to the fact that the majority of the population in these areas owe their economic survival directly or indirectly to the govt.

But when the next election cycle passes, and the American Nazi Party is out of power, dont forget this call to look at the Constitution. It is the Democratic Party that keeps trying to officially rewrite the thing, saying it should be a living document, subject to change or reversal, without the process now in place.
shirtsleeve is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-20-2006, 06:48 PM   #8
All Pro Poster
 
wistahpatsfan's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 15,621
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by shirtsleeve
...But when the next election cycle passes, and the American Nazi Party is out of power, dont forget this call to look at the Constitution. It is the Democratic Party that keeps trying to officially rewrite the thing, saying it should be a living document, subject to change or reversal, without the process now in place.
You must be referring to the movement to amend the Constitution to ban Gay marriage. Please be aware that BOTH parties are guilty of manipulating the Constitution for their own short-sighted purposes. There needs to be a cleansing of the law code, beginning with the repeal of the 16th Amendment and replace it with one that guarantees the right to control one's own body.
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
wistahpatsfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-20-2006, 07:27 PM   #9
In the Starting Line-up
 
shirtsleeve's Avatar
 

Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: stuck at work
Posts: 2,730
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by wistahpatsfan
You must be referring to the movement to amend the Constitution to ban Gay marriage. Please be aware that BOTH parties are guilty of manipulating the Constitution for their own short-sighted purposes. There needs to be a cleansing of the law code, beginning with the repeal of the 16th Amendment and replace it with one that guarantees the right to control one's own body.
No, I wasn't referring to that, though I'm against such an amendment. The 16th needs to go. As far as replacing it, are you referring to abortion? Cant support that one, either. Not a right wing religious nut, here. I'm all for birth control and some of the new drugs that can be given post coitus(no stinkin' spell check) before conception occurs, that actually prevent conception. But life begins at conception, and being a constitutionalist, I cannot violate the rights of the unborn to life liberty and the pursuit of happiness.
shirtsleeve is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-20-2006, 11:09 PM   #10
All Pro Poster
 
wistahpatsfan's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 15,621
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by shirtsleeve
No, I wasn't referring to that, though I'm against such an amendment. The 16th needs to go. As far as replacing it, are you referring to abortion? Cant support that one, either. Not a right wing religious nut, here. I'm all for birth control and some of the new drugs that can be given post coitus(no stinkin' spell check) before conception occurs, that actually prevent conception. But life begins at conception, and being a constitutionalist, I cannot violate the rights of the unborn to life liberty and the pursuit of happiness.
I only mentioned it because you said the Dems were the ones who change the Constitution and I was just pointing out the last attempt at it was by the repubs, not that it matters.

I'm talking about everything about an ADULT's body, and that includes abortion, as much as I hate it being a part of our society (and it always will be). It also includes drug use, suicide, right to die, and standardizing the age of consent to cover drinking, marriage, enlistment, credit and loans, penal system...whatever. We're gonna have to part ways on the constitutionality of abortion here forever cause I'm not gonna bang heads on that one.
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
wistahpatsfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:03 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2

© Copyright 2000-2012. PatsFans.com Is a Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties.
The opinions posted in this forum do not necessarily reflect the opinions of our staff at PatsFans.com or USA Today.
We are not affiliated with the New England Patriots™ or the NFL™. The Photo Used In the header was taken by Ian Logue.

This site is owned and operated by I&K Internet Design Enterprises, LLC