12-02-2009, 03:49 PM
|
#7
|
|
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 8,608
|
Re: Rumsfeld Should Have Stayed Silent
Quote:
Originally Posted by reflexblue
I didn't come up with that i heard it used four of five years ago to explain that these guys Bush Cheney Rumy, and Wolfowitz don't lie because they believe what they're saying. From what i can remember it was going to be their defense if ever brought up on charges of lying to congress. I guess that means they're pretty much lying all the time.
|
It's used, but it's complete crap.
The case that proves their fraud was willful, premeditated and systematic is vast beyond surface comprehension. There is so much overlapping evidence that proves they knew exactly what they were doing, it's really beyond any logical dispute.
The books Hubris, Blood Money and Shock Doctrine immediately come to mind. Testimony from CIA, governmental documents, foreign heads of state, factual timelines, etc.. ... If you don't have time to read over 1000 pages on their willful fraud, just watch any of the dozen or so PBS Frontline reports, such as "Darkside" or "Rumsfeld's War."
|
|
|