ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW
Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!
Remember when Republican senators like Lindsey Graham and Jeff Sessions were against judicial filibusters?
(Melina Mara/the Washington Post)
By Dana Milbank
Wednesday, November 18, 2009
In their quest to thwart President Obama, Republicans do not fear the hobgoblin of consistency.
For much of this decade, Sen. Jeff Sessions of Alabama, now the top Republican on the Judiciary Committee, led the fight against Democratic filibusters of George W. Bush's judicial nominees. He decried Democrats' "unprecedented, obstructive tactics." To have Bush nominees "opposed on a partisan filibuster, it is really wrong," he added. He demanded they get "an up-and-down vote." He praised Republican leaders because they "opposed judicial filibusters" and have "been consistent on this issue even when it was not to their political benefit to do so."
So now a Democratic president is in the White House and he has nominated his first appellate judicial nominee, U.S. District Judge David Hamilton. And what did Sessions do? He went to the floor and led a filibuster.
"I opposed filibusters before," the Alabaman said with his trademark twang. But in this case, he went on, "I don't agree with his judicial philosophy. Therefore, I believe this side cannot acquiesce into a philosophy that says that Democratic presidents can get their judges confirmed with 50 votes."
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
"The most difficult subjects can be explained to the most slow-witted man if he has not formed any idea of them already; but the simplest thing cannot be made clear to the most intelligent man if he is firmly persuaded that he knows already, without a shadow of doubt, what is laid before him." Leo Tolstoy, 1897
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!
Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.
NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98
The dems are trying to create additional judical positions are the appelate elvel so they can stuff the court with more left wing extremist the pubbies didn't do that . Neither are very good the dems are much worse.
__________________
"Some guys play in all-star games, some guys don't. I don't know who picks all those all-star teams. In all honesty, I don't know who picks the combine, for that matter," Belichick said. "How does (Miami-Ohio offensive lineman Brandon) Brooks not get invited to the combine? How did Vollmer not get invited to the combine? I don't know. We can't really worry about that. We just have to try to evaluate them the best we can."
The dems are trying to create additional judical positions are the appelate elvel so they can stuff the court with more left wing extremist the pubbies didn't do that . Neither are very good the dems are much worse.
Umm, link please? That sounds very suspiciously like something you just made up.
They want to pass laws from the bench that can't pass in congress.
__________________
"Some guys play in all-star games, some guys don't. I don't know who picks all those all-star teams. In all honesty, I don't know who picks the combine, for that matter," Belichick said. "How does (Miami-Ohio offensive lineman Brandon) Brooks not get invited to the combine? How did Vollmer not get invited to the combine? I don't know. We can't really worry about that. We just have to try to evaluate them the best we can."
They want to pass laws from the bench that can't pass in congress.
Good stuff, dude. Good stuff.
Do you want to know why they can't pass in Congress? Because the Republicans won't support it.
Do you know why the Republicans won't support it? Because there's a Democratic president.
Quote:
A similar bill introduced last year had the backing of a number of Republican Senators, including Sens. Orrin Hatch (R- Utah), Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa), Jon Kyl (R-Ariz.) and Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) who voted for its passage in the Senate Judiciary Committee.
Oh, and about this "nefarious" piece of legislation:
Quote:
The Act mirrors the recommendations of the Judicial Conference of the United States - chaired by Chief Justice John Roberts - which carefully assessed court workloads and other local factors including the number of senior, magistrate, and visiting judges; geographical factors; and case complexity.
Well DUDE they have 60 seats in the Senate and a 50 seat majority in the House, so they can do what they please. Perhaps they want some stupid RINO's to vote for their crap so thay don't have to take responsibility for the crap they are passing that is hurting the country DUDE.
__________________
"Some guys play in all-star games, some guys don't. I don't know who picks all those all-star teams. In all honesty, I don't know who picks the combine, for that matter," Belichick said. "How does (Miami-Ohio offensive lineman Brandon) Brooks not get invited to the combine? How did Vollmer not get invited to the combine? I don't know. We can't really worry about that. We just have to try to evaluate them the best we can."
Well DUDE they have 60 seats in the Senate and a 50 seat majority in the House, so they can do what they please. Perhaps they want some stupid RINO's to vote for their crap so thay don't have to take responsibility for the crap they are passing that is hurting the country DUDE.
I see. You're giving up your previous argument, after having been proven wrong, and instead arguing...
Well, I don't really know. Interesting how when Republicans are in office, every appointee deserves an up or down vote, and when Democrats are in office... filibuster away, gents!
I see. You're giving up your previous argument, after having been proven wrong, and instead arguing...
Well, I don't really know. Interesting how when Republicans are in office, every appointee deserves an up or down vote, and when Democrats are in office... filibuster away, gents!
The dems blocked the bill until BO was in power
__________________
"Some guys play in all-star games, some guys don't. I don't know who picks all those all-star teams. In all honesty, I don't know who picks the combine, for that matter," Belichick said. "How does (Miami-Ohio offensive lineman Brandon) Brooks not get invited to the combine? How did Vollmer not get invited to the combine? I don't know. We can't really worry about that. We just have to try to evaluate them the best we can."
I see. You're giving up your previous argument, after having been proven wrong, and instead arguing...
Well, I don't really know. Interesting how when Republicans are in office, every appointee deserves an up or down vote, and when Democrats are in office... filibuster away, gents!
Bingo....
Quote:
Originally Posted by patsfan13
The dems blocked the bill until BO was in power
....and bingo.
Coke or Pepsi.
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
"The most difficult subjects can be explained to the most slow-witted man if he has not formed any idea of them already; but the simplest thing cannot be made clear to the most intelligent man if he is firmly persuaded that he knows already, without a shadow of doubt, what is laid before him." Leo Tolstoy, 1897