ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW
Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!
Scott A. Johnson - End Times Current Events and Bible Study
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!
Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.
NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98
Re: "Popular websites may have to be blocked" in the case of a pandemic according to
well, i read the story and it sounds to me like a backdoor ploy to inch closer to scrapping net neutrality... including phrases like:
"... reduce residential transmission speeds to make way for commerce."
"their ability to execute and process trades should not be affected by any congestion"
"Such network congestion could prevent staff from broker-dealers...."
Interestingly, no talk of increasing bandwith by improving infrastructure... Can't have that.... Just more fear card rhetoric in order to protect and expand corporate enterprise. A nice trial run, in the form of disease fear.
Because of course, any kid laying home puking his guts out just wants to hop on the net and play WoW all day. 40% of them, no doubt.
Last edited by PressCoverage; 10-28-2009 at 10:25 PM..