ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW
Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!
Given your posts it seems you're less of a loon and just extremely ignorant: a barometer of the memes the Average Joe has internalized.
Funny you should write this. I find PR's posts well thought out and informative - just the opposite of yours. Over the past year, I've noticed that a notable amount of your posts are simply obnoxious personal attacks and provide no intellectual stimulus whatsoever. Ironic, huh?
__________________ “If you have been voting for politicians who promise to give you goodies at someone else's expense, then you have no right to complain when they take your money and give it to someone else, including themselves.” ~ Thomas Sowell
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!
Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.
NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98
Good for Lieberman. Although the people like generic "healthcare reform" they don't like the current bills so they shouldn't be bullied through - especially with 51 votes, shame on you for wanting that, HD.
Interestingly, polls do favor a public option of some kind but not with the specific bills which would favor the public option over private system to the point that it's a non level playing field. Instead of bullying this through they need to take the parts the people do want and making something work with those as constraints instead of adding all kinds of crap that is unpopular.
What I'm saying to the people of Connecticut, I can do more for you and your families to get something done to make health care affordable, to get universal health insurance.
On what planet is passing a bill in the Senate with 51 votes considered "bullying"?
You know the answer to that, it will be filibustered and it is bullying to use reconciliation on something of this size.
Wait for a week from today when the Republicans win the Governor races in VA and NJ; Dems will be running for the hills to listen to their constituents instead of Harry and Nancy.
If the dems wanted to go nuclear they could. They won't though. They want to be reelected in their eventual campaigns, and going nuke will affect that.
Good for Lieberman in the sense that he understands what the basic implementation of the bill in question would mean for people. It's encouraging that someone in DC understands that stuff.
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
"The most difficult subjects can be explained to the most slow-witted man if he has not formed any idea of them already; but the simplest thing cannot be made clear to the most intelligent man if he is firmly persuaded that he knows already, without a shadow of doubt, what is laid before him." Leo Tolstoy, 1897
You know the answer to that, it will be filibustered and it is bullying to use reconciliation on something of this size.
Wait for a week from today when the Republicans win the Governor races in VA and NJ; Dems will be running for the hills to listen to their constituents instead of Harry and Nancy.
I wouldn't be so sure about New Jersey. VA, yes, but Creigh Deeds is a douche who ran a horrible campaign so I'm not sure I'd hang my hat on that one.
Don't Republicans typically filibuster just about every piece of legislation that comes up for a vote these days?
If the dems wanted to go nuclear they could. They won't though. They want to be reelected in their eventual campaigns, and going nuke will affect that.
Good for Lieberman in the sense that he understands what the basic implementation of the bill in question would mean for people. It's encouraging that someone in DC understands that stuff.
If you really think that's what Joe Lieberman is basing this calculation on, I have some nice waterfront property to sell you.