Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!
ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW
Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!
The ramifications were already discussed on this board for years, what more do you want? They are all easily search-able, the old threads.
Ramification is that the US in under 3 years will be unable to print MONOPOLY money, to foreign nations, in exchange for products, goods, and services.
This means either *massive* hyper-inflation coming very soon, meaning $10-15 gallon of milk, or severe reduction in government spending, which includes military and wars.
Either way we're screwed and bound to drop from #1. There is no stopping it.
The fed is doing its best, but increasing or decreasing the rates, at this point, are BOTH lose-lose situations. They can only slow the downfall as best they can.
+1..... spot on.
not bad for a guy no one here seemed to ever listen to for years. I got/get the same reaction. Bad news is unpleasant, and the human condition is to reject it, despite all evidence . ... Evidence that seems to compound itself on a weekly basis the past 2-3 years.
As I have said since I joined: Deny the geopolitical signs of collapse at your own peril. It's the first and toughest stage of grief. ... We'll be over here at "acceptance," and planning to adjust accordingly.
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!
Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.
NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98
It is in the best interest of those who currently are in debt in dollars to inflate the currency. This is exactly what will happen. If you owe $1Million to china, wouldn't it be nice to pay that back when its value is less?.
The rest of the world knows this as well. China and Japan, with their multi-trillions in US dollar reserves, are keenly aware of this fact.
HOWEVER, the moment we try to do this, we screw ALL our foreign investors (not just the Japanese or Chinese), and the dollar and US government immediately lose credibility, and thus their value.
Our currency is based on smoke and mirrors. The moment we try to get out of our debt by trashing our own currency, it becomes even more problematic, because no one will want to buy debt or trust the US government anymore. Look at Argentina.
Also, you would be screwing over the American people as well.
Sure, it'd be nice to pay back China's trillion+ with money that was worth 1/3 as much. But, that also means that it would costs Americans 3 times as much to buy anything foreign, traveling would be extremely expensive, and we wouldn't be able to import as much since no one would want our monopoly-money export anymore.
Last edited by maverick4; 10-06-2009 at 05:25 PM..
What I find most interesting is how this story proves a fundamental law about current right-wing partisan politics. If you're considered "anti-American" while a Republican is president, you must be pilloried at every instance. During the Bush years, Robert Fisk was so hated by the right for his anti-Iraq war reporting and pro-Palestine stance that his very name, "fisk," became Internet slang for the process of demolishing the inaccuracies of someone's reporting via line-by-line online analysis.
But under a Democratic president, anything that can be considered "anti-American" -- such as a supposed worldwide push against the dollar -- must be promoted and lauded and celebrated, simply because it might make Obama look bad. This is the Chicago Olympics theory of the dollar. Thus, a big push from Drudge, as well as links from RedState and Instapundit.
Instapundit! Where proprietor Glenn Reynolds once wrote: "Robert Fisk: Indistinguishable from Islamist propaganda."
The notion that a cold shoulder to the dollar by the world is a specific reproach aimed at Obama's policies, instead of the accumulated irresponsibility of American administrations helmed by both parties over the last 30 years, is just nuts. Watching the right-wing blogosphere embrace one of their most hated foes, simply because his latest scoop can be employed to critique Obama, would be embarrassing and sickening, if it wasn't just so predictable.
Last edited by PressCoverage; 10-07-2009 at 04:00 AM..
What I find most interesting is how this story proves a fundamental law about current right-wing partisan politics. If you're considered "anti-American" while a Republican is president, you must be pilloried at every instance. During the Bush years, Robert Fisk was so hated by the right for his anti-Iraq war reporting and pro-Palestine stance that his very name, "fisk," became Internet slang for the process of demolishing the inaccuracies of someone's reporting via line-by-line online analysis.
But under a Democratic president, anything that can be considered "anti-American" -- such as a supposed worldwide push against the dollar -- must be promoted and lauded and celebrated, simply because it might make Obama look bad. This is the Chicago Olympics theory of the dollar. Thus, a big push from Drudge, as well as links from RedState and Instapundit.
Instapundit! Where proprietor Glenn Reynolds once wrote: "Robert Fisk: Indistinguishable from Islamist propaganda."
The notion that a cold shoulder to the dollar by the world is a specific reproach aimed at Obama's policies, instead of the accumulated irresponsibility of American administrations helmed by both parties over the last 30 years, is just nuts. Watching the right-wing blogosphere embrace one of their most hated foes, simply because his latest scoop can be employed to critique Obama, would be embarrassing and sickening, if it wasn't just so predictable.
Coke & Pepsi pal. A guy the left loves during the Bush years, is chastised by the right. Now, that same guy is being pimped by the right, to the dismay of the left. The more things change, the more they seem the same.
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
"The most difficult subjects can be explained to the most slow-witted man if he has not formed any idea of them already; but the simplest thing cannot be made clear to the most intelligent man if he is firmly persuaded that he knows already, without a shadow of doubt, what is laid before him." Leo Tolstoy, 1897
Coke & Pepsi pal. A guy the left loves during the Bush years, is chastised by the right. Now, that same guy is being pimped by the right, to the dismay of the left. The more things change, the more they seem the same.
That's a really great attempt at symmetry, but "to the dismay of the left" is meaningless, let alone the same thing as "chastised by the right."
Trying to compare us to Argentina is a stretch. Argentina is a 3rd world country without the world's #1 economy under it's hood. I think inflation is a given. The one caveat in all this, is that it's a global economic problem. So while we're in the pooper economically, so isn't everyone else. My question in this thread, is not what's going on with the economy. My question is what a switch from the dollar would mean, with respect to the trade of oil. Obviously we would have to buy oil in Currency X, which would push the cost to us higher, since the dollar is so weak. So it would clearly mean an inflationary reaction to all things petroleum. That's not good, since petroleum is used to make, transport, and deliver so many goods and services. From bringing people to work by way of fuel, to building products in manufacturing, to being the key component to all things plastic, to heating homes, to transporting goods across the globe, etc. So a spike in the cost of oil would be a certain negative. Think of when gas was $4 a gallon, but figure on it being that way more permanantly. Not good.
The benefits would be there though. Not short term, but long term. We'd have more pressure to become energy independent. We'd be forced to become more fiscally responsible. We'd have to withdraw all of our forces from across the globe. We would no longer be able to give away billions of dollars in foreign aid, and we could finally become isolationist. While this would take time, and would be difficult in the short term, it could be a net benefit over the long haul.
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
"The most difficult subjects can be explained to the most slow-witted man if he has not formed any idea of them already; but the simplest thing cannot be made clear to the most intelligent man if he is firmly persuaded that he knows already, without a shadow of doubt, what is laid before him." Leo Tolstoy, 1897
I mean, not even sure where to start with the response.
Did you never read any of the say, half dozen threads here already in the past, about petrodollar?
The world IS going to shift away from the dollar in buying oil, and multiple things are going to ***** for us the second that happens.
Luckily, we have nukes and have extreme leaders in certain departments probably crazy enough to use it.... so our decline will likely be slow and gradual rather than quick.