Non-partisan Budget Chief contradicts Obama's claim re Medicare coverage - New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard
Men's Apparel Jerseys Hats Novelties Throwback Women's Youth
 
REGISTER FOR PATSFANS.COM

Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!


Go Back   New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard > Off Topic Forums > Political Discussion
Forgot Password? Join PatsFans.com!
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Arcade Mark Forums Read Chat Room

WELCOME TO OUR FORUM HERE AT PATSFANS.COM!
ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW

Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-23-2009, 02:03 PM   #1
All Pro Poster
 
Fogbuster's Avatar
 

Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 13,674
Default Non-partisan Budget Chief contradicts Obama's claim re Medicare coverage

.

Budget chief contradicts Obama on Medicare costs

By ERICA WERNER (AP) – 21 hours ago

WASHINGTON — Congress' chief budget officer is contradicting President Barack Obama's oft-stated claim that seniors wouldn't see their Medicare benefits cut under a health care overhaul.

The head of the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office, Douglas Elmendorf, told senators Tuesday that seniors in Medicare's managed care plans would see reduced benefits under a bill in the Finance Committee.

The bill would cut payments to the Medicare Advantage plans by more than $100 billion over 10 years.
...

Obama says cuts to Medicare providers won't reduce seniors' benefits.

The Associated Press: Budget chief contradicts Obama on Medicare costs

Somebody's lying.

//
__________________
"All that is required for evil to triumph is for good to do nothing."
Fogbuster is offline   Reply With Quote
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!

Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account
including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.

NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98

Updated 07/08/11

Help Us Reach Our Goal!

Old 09-23-2009, 04:32 PM   #2
Hall of Fame Poster
 
Real World's Avatar
 

Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Boston
Posts: 25,140
My Mood: Yeehaw
Default Re: Non-partisan Budget Chief contradicts Obama's claim re Medicare coverage

Well, that depends on what the definition of "is" is.
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


"The most difficult subjects can be explained to the most slow-witted man if he has not formed any idea of them already; but the simplest thing cannot be made clear to the most intelligent man if he is firmly persuaded that he knows already, without a shadow of doubt, what is laid before him."
Leo Tolstoy, 1897
Real World is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2009, 05:12 PM   #3
Experienced Starter w/First Big Contract
 

Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Brighton, MA
Posts: 5,742
Default Re: Non-partisan Budget Chief contradicts Obama's claim re Medicare coverage

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fogbuster View Post
.

Somebody's lying.
Yeah, its you. There's like 6 different bills bouncing around Congress right now. Is Obama responsible for all of them? Even if a couple contradict each other?

Until one emerges from both houses and Obama actually signs it you're just being your usual BS self.
__________________
Give a man a gun and he can rob a bank, give a man a bank and he can rob everyone.
sdaniels7114 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2009, 05:15 PM   #4
In the Starting Line-up
 
alvinnf's Avatar
 

Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 3,258
My Mood: Tired
Default Re: Non-partisan Budget Chief contradicts Obama's claim re Medicare coverage

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fogbuster View Post
.

Budget chief contradicts Obama on Medicare costs

By ERICA WERNER (AP) – 21 hours ago

WASHINGTON — Congress' chief budget officer is contradicting President Barack Obama's oft-stated claim that seniors wouldn't see their Medicare benefits cut under a health care overhaul.

The head of the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office, Douglas Elmendorf, told senators Tuesday that seniors in Medicare's managed care plans would see reduced benefits under a bill in the Finance Committee.

The bill would cut payments to the Medicare Advantage plans by more than $100 billion over 10 years.
...

Obama says cuts to Medicare providers won't reduce seniors' benefits.

The Associated Press: Budget chief contradicts Obama on Medicare costs

Somebody's lying.

//
Cuts might not reduce benefits to seniors. It will however cut the price paid to the provider. That I can gaurantee.
alvinnf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2009, 06:34 PM   #5
Hall of Fame Poster
 
Real World's Avatar
 

Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Boston
Posts: 25,140
My Mood: Yeehaw
Default Re: Non-partisan Budget Chief contradicts Obama's claim re Medicare coverage

Quote:
Originally Posted by alvinnf View Post
Cuts might not reduce benefits to seniors. It will however cut the price paid to the provider. That I can gaurantee.
Yeah, so who ends up paying the difference? Anyone want to guess?
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


"The most difficult subjects can be explained to the most slow-witted man if he has not formed any idea of them already; but the simplest thing cannot be made clear to the most intelligent man if he is firmly persuaded that he knows already, without a shadow of doubt, what is laid before him."
Leo Tolstoy, 1897
Real World is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2009, 06:54 PM   #6
Moderator
 

Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 22,060
My Mood: Fine
Default Re: Non-partisan Budget Chief contradicts Obama's claim re Medicare coverage

Quote:
Originally Posted by sdaniels7114 View Post
There's like 6 different bills bouncing around Congress right now. Is Obama responsible for all of them? Even if a couple contradict each other?

Well no Pelosi is still referring to HR3200, the outline of Baucus's bill has been published (minus the 500 amendments proposed). The absurd part is that Pelosi has blocked a proposal that members be given a couple of days to review the 'final bill' likewise H Reid won't allow 72 hrs to review the 'final' bill in the Senate which will be an amendment to a TARP bill. THe bills won't be put on the web for public review the CBO isn't being given time to finish an analysis before the votes.

This is the game the dims are playing with 1/6th of the economy. So much foir transparency.


Quote:
Until one emerges from both houses and Obama actually signs it you're just being your usual BS self.
BO has punted but said he will support whatever mess is passed by congress. So he is accountable for the lies he told. If he didn't have the final product why say there would be no tax increases, or portability and lie?
__________________
"Some guys play in all-star games, some guys don't. I don't know who picks all those all-star teams. In all honesty, I don't know who picks the combine, for that matter," Belichick said. "How does (Miami-Ohio offensive lineman Brandon) Brooks not get invited to the combine? How did Vollmer not get invited to the combine? I don't know. We can't really worry about that. We just have to try to evaluate them the best we can."
patsfan13 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 09-24-2009, 04:37 AM   #7
PatsFans.com Supporter
 
DarrylS's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: In a very special place
Posts: 36,137
My Mood: Psychedelic
Default Re: Non-partisan Budget Chief contradicts Obama's claim re Medicare coverage

Quote:
Originally Posted by patsfan13 View Post
Well no Pelosi is still referring to HR3200, the outline of Baucus's bill has been published (minus the 500 amendments proposed). The absurd part is that Pelosi has blocked a proposal that members be given a couple of days to review the 'final bill' likewise H Reid won't allow 72 hrs to review the 'final' bill in the Senate which will be an amendment to a TARP bill. THe bills won't be put on the web for public review the CBO isn't being given time to finish an analysis before the vote
The Lobbyists will not get a chance to ramp up their rhetoric and get Freedomworks and the rest of their lackeys all fired up to stop this damned bill... lemmings need an opportunity to organize.
__________________
"Being the best doesn't mean you always win. It just means you win more than anyone else".. tweet from Kurt Warner to Tom Brady.
DarrylS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-24-2009, 05:33 AM   #8
All Pro Poster
 
Mrs.PatsFanInVa's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 12,194
My Mood: Amazed
Default Re: Non-partisan Budget Chief contradicts Obama's claim re Medicare coverage

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fogbuster View Post
.


The bill would cut payments to the Medicare Advantage plans by more than $100 billion over 10 years.
...
The key word here is Medicare ADVANTAGE plans.

These plans are not Medicare as you know it. They are medicare programs run by private insurance companies and they are relatively new and they haven't been working out so well for patient or doctor alike.

I've had a few of our patients who switched to one only to become totally disillusioned within months and switch back to Medicare at the first opportunity.

Some of the Advantage plans are cheaper - but at a cost. Most are HMOs, so you're entirely limited in your choice of physician, lab, hospital etc. There are those who say you can see "any willing doctor" but, as a person working in a doctor's office, most doctors aren't willing.

Medicare is dependable, it is fairly quick-paying and the paper work is minimal compared to private insurers. The "Advantage plans" are none of those things. Doctors accept them for awhile because they like their patients, they don't want to upset them by denying their insurance and they are hopeful that it'll work out.

It doesn't and a few months down the line the doctor has to tell the patient that he can no longer accept the Advantage plan in question and the patient will have to find a new doctor or cover the cost of the visit out of pocket.

That's the point where the patient finds out that not only will his old doctor no longer take his insurance but that there are very very few other doctors who will accept the insurance plan.

Personally I think it would be a great idea to ban private insurance companies from getting involved in Medicare at all.

Don't trust me, tho, check it out for yourself.

http://www.medicare.gov/MPPF/Include...sAtAGlance.asp
Mrs.PatsFanInVa is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 09-24-2009, 05:45 AM   #9
All Pro Poster
 
Mrs.PatsFanInVa's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 12,194
My Mood: Amazed
Default Re: Non-partisan Budget Chief contradicts Obama's claim re Medicare coverage

Oh yeah, and another thing:

There have been multiple complaints about The Advantage Plans. Many private insurers have already been stopped from offering them.

Reducing payments to physicians or HMOs who are involved in Advantage Plans are nothing new. It's just one more example of Obama having to finish fullfilling Bush's empty promises. Congress started considering reductions in payments back in 2007.

The changes don't solve fundamental problems with Medicare Advantage and are a ``pathetic attempt'' to protect the plans, said Representative Pete Stark, a California Democrat and chairman of the House Ways and Means Health Subcommittee, which is reviewing U.S. payments to the providers.

``Independent and nonpartisan experts agree that private plans are massively overpaid relative to Medicare,'' Stark said in a statement. ``The excessive payments also provide an incentive for marketing abuses that will continue as long as they are in effect.''

Congress is considering cutting payments for Medicare Advantage, which costs about 12 percent more than government- administered Medicare benefits


Humana, UnitedHealth Suspend Some Health Plans After Complaints - Bloomberg.com

http://www.consumeraffairs.com/news0...advantage.html


At a committee hearing Wednesday, Wisconsin Insurance Commissioner Sean Dilweg testified that 37 out of 43 states that participated in a recent survey reported complaints about Medicare Advantage plan sales agents and their confusing or misleading marketing practices.

“In the most troubling of these cases, unscrupulous agents have enrolled beneficiaries with dementia into an inappropriate plan,” Dilweg said. “Seniors are being told that they can go to any provider without being told that they may only go to a provider that accepts Medicare, and also a provider that has agreed to accept the plan's payments.”



Read more: http://www.consumeraffairs.com/news0...#ixzz0S1InwhTD

Did you feel the same back in 2007 when Congress mentioned cutting payments and/or applying better guidelines or is this a relatively new and Obama-related disgust?

A huge part of the cause of the current health care crisis is the fact that the previous administration refused to do anything about gross overpayments and/or creating federal guidelines for private insurers.

Last edited by Mrs.PatsFanInVa; 09-24-2009 at 06:20 AM..
Mrs.PatsFanInVa is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 09-24-2009, 08:27 AM   #10
PatsFans.com Supporter
 
DarrylS's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: In a very special place
Posts: 36,137
My Mood: Psychedelic
Default Re: Non-partisan Budget Chief contradicts Obama's claim re Medicare coverage

Good Response Ms. PatsfaninVa... glad to see you provide some sanity to this often maddening situation..
__________________
"Being the best doesn't mean you always win. It just means you win more than anyone else".. tweet from Kurt Warner to Tom Brady.
DarrylS is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Sponsored Links



Thread Tools
Display Modes


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Obama's 9.5% jobloss claim is BOGUS and The Economy Is Even Worse Than You Think NEPatriot Political Discussion 19 07-15-2009 11:38 AM
Obama's SEC chief gave Madoff's son job regulating securities mikey Political Discussion 0 12-29-2008 10:04 PM
Blagojevich and Obama's Chief of Staff communication was captured on tape NEPatriot Political Discussion 72 12-28-2008 03:33 AM
Solomon's draft chat contradicts earlier Holley 'report' Pats67 PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum 8 04-28-2006 03:46 PM
Humor: Patriots Claim Lack of Recent Media Coverage a Sign of Disrespect Box_O_Rocks PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum 15 06-04-2005 12:53 PM



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:34 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2

© Copyright 2000-2012. PatsFans.com Is a Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties.
The opinions posted in this forum do not necessarily reflect the opinions of our staff at PatsFans.com or USA Today.
We are not affiliated with the New England Patriots™ or the NFL™. The Photo Used In the header was taken by Ian Logue.

This site is owned and operated by I&K Internet Design Enterprises, LLC