Families sue school system for denial of constatutional rights - New England Patriots Forums

***reflexblue*** · 08-11-2009, 09:54 AM

I think i'm getting to the point where i've seen everything. In one of the more bizzare things i've ever read the parents claim their constitutional rights have been denied because the schools will not physically restrain their children.

Obviously most people here including myself would think that its their responsability not the schools.

The parents, within their suit, said they were deprived of their right to "maintain the integrity of the family,' and that their minor children were deprived of the right to be "free from educational abuse and neglect."

Springfield truant teens lawsuit dismissed - MassLive.com

U.S. Magistrate Judge Kenneth P. Neiman, in dismissing the case, said the parents had not proven that the school department's failure to hold their children in their classrooms and schools deprived the two families of their constitutional rights....

***Harry Boy*** · 08-11-2009, 10:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by reflexblue

I think i'm getting to the point where i've seen everything. In one of the more bizzare things i've ever read the parents claim their constitutional rights have been denied because the schools will not physically restrain their children.

Obviously most people here including myself would think that its their responsability not the schools.

The parents, within their suit, said they were deprived of their right to "maintain the integrity of the family,' and that their minor children were deprived of the right to be "free from educational abuse and neglect."

Springfield truant teens lawsuit dismissed - MassLive.com

U.S. Magistrate Judge Kenneth P. Neiman, in dismissing the case, said the parents had not proven that the school department's failure to hold their children in their classrooms and schools deprived the two families of their constitutional rights....

The results of insane Liberal Bull***** and it will only get worse.

***reflexblue*** · 08-11-2009, 10:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Harry Boy

The results of insane Liberal Bull***** and it will only get worse.

These people think that the schools are suppose to be responsable for thir kids, their not. Everytime i read the article it got crazir, the lawyer sounds like he went got his degree on line and may also be a dentist and a real estate agent also.

godef · 08-11-2009, 01:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by reflexblue

...the parents claim their constitutional rights have been denied because the schools will not physically restrain their children... said ... that their minor children were deprived of the right to be "free from educational abuse and neglect."

Isn't that a contradiction? You're right, these parents are loony.

Patsfanin Philly · 08-11-2009, 01:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by reflexblue

These people think that the schools are suppose to be responsable for thir kids, their not. Everytime i read the article it got crazir, the lawyer sounds like he went got his degree on line and may also be a dentist and a real estate agent also.

That's an insult to dentists and real estate agents everywhere. And If the school had restrained their kids, the parents and the ACLU would have been all over them..How about a little personal responsibility?????