Edit- I missed this on the main page. Mods feel free to delete or merge......
With Rupert Murdoch’s NewsCorp planning to charge for Internet news (e.g. foxnews.com) and the Boston Globe planning the same at the other end of the political spectrum, I’m sure the thought has crossed our minds as well if the sites we take for granted will charge like ATMs did . They were free in the beginning and once they sucked us in, they charged
Sign me up when the time comes. This site and maybe one or two others (profootballtalk.com and realclearpolitics.com) are the only ones worth paying for…………And I’m sure many others feel that way……
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Globe says readers to pay for Web site - BostonHerald.com
Globe says readers to pay for Web site
By Christine McConville
Friday, August 7, 2009 - Updated 7h ago
!
The Boston Globe will soon begin charging for its Web site, publisher P. Steven Ainsley told the paper’s union bosses yesterday as the Globe’s parent
New York Times [NYT] Co. confirmed in a regulatory filing that the money-losing Hub broadsheet is for sale.
News of the Globe’s intention to charge for Boston.com came a day after
News Corp. [NWS] Chairman Rupert Murdoch announced his company would start charging for content at all of its news Web sites, including the New York Post, The Times of London and The Sun, a popular British tabloid. News Corp. already charges for some access to The Wall Street Journal’s Web site.
Globe spokesman Bob Powers said charging for Boston.com appears inevitable.
.
News Corp tests charge-for-content policy at Sunday Times: report
[/IMG]