07-03-2009, 10:40 AM
|
#4
|
|
All Pro Poster
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 17,627
My Mood:
|
Re: Ex-Cigna Exec On Insurance Co. Practices
Good info Philly...
Just like we do have to be as vigilant as possible to catch public sector (read, gubmit) waste, fraud, and abuse, it's incumbent on us all to keep abreast of the private sector equivalent.
One big difference is nobody claims that "greed is good" in gubmit, so you'd expect (after a few decades of anti-gubmit gubmit) that there's less low-hanging fruit... but low-hanging fruit is low-hanging fruit. One look at municipal and state pensions will tell you that. Short-term thinking, to say the least, and a big fat bill they can't pay.
I don't want to go all partisan here. Just pointing out that as the model shifts from gubmit as booster of private sector to gubmit as regulator of private sector, the first question is "Uh, but won't that screw up market models that somehow benefit all of us?"
The answer appears to be, be very very careful when tinkering... but those models were never set up with our well-being in mind.
That's as partisan as I'll get... Philly, it's good to get an insight from you and not be in a war in the process. Whatever we believe about pure or mixed models, at the very least we can agree that frankly, everybody is out to get us, defining "us" as the consumer... if it's worth a buck to them.
PFnV
|
|
|