Time to strike down Chicago's handgun ban? - New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard
Men's Apparel Jerseys Hats Novelties Throwback Women's Youth
 
REGISTER FOR PATSFANS.COM

Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!


Go Back   New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard > Off Topic Forums > Political Discussion
Forgot Password? Join PatsFans.com!
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Arcade Mark Forums Read Chat Room

WELCOME TO OUR FORUM HERE AT PATSFANS.COM!
ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW

Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-12-2009, 09:12 AM   #1
In the Starting Line-up
 
State's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,408
My Mood: Relaxed
Default Time to strike down Chicago's handgun ban?

You betcha.

Why the Supreme Court should strike down Chicago's handgun ban

You know, this thing called the embarrassing Second Amendment. (Embarrassing to liberals, that is.) Sanford Levinson of the Univ of Texas law school called it that.

source: Taking On Gun Control - 2nd Amendment Page

I remember that after some fat lesbian attacked Tom Selleck on her TV program, when he was there to talk about a project, it was learned she had her own armed security guards. I guess she's saying that's not good enough for the rest of us.

source: ROSIE VS. TOM
State is offline   Reply With Quote
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!

Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account
including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.

NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98

Updated 07/08/11

Help Us Reach Our Goal!

Old 06-12-2009, 09:22 AM   #2
PatsFans.com Supporter
 
DarrylS's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: In a very special place
Posts: 36,123
My Mood: Psychedelic
Default Re: Time to strike down Chicago's handgun ban?

No need to resort extreme right wing blogs and Roseann Barr.. most people will probably agree that it will be overturned.. the 2nd amendment is what it is.. and will probably never change.. there are those who want everyone to believe there is some type of clandestine effort to change it, but it will not.
__________________
"Being the best doesn't mean you always win. It just means you win more than anyone else".. tweet from Kurt Warner to Tom Brady.
DarrylS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2009, 09:25 AM   #3
Moderator
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 16,335
My Mood: Mellow
Default Re: Time to strike down Chicago's handgun ban?

Of course there's that troublesome part in the seconed amendment about "A well regulated militia." That seems to imply the right to regulate the militia. There was feeling at the time that the US did not need a military, and that the people themselves, collectively, would simply join together to fight any foe. In that case, you would them need arms and a well-regulated militia. Well, the fact is things changed, and we know we need a military but not a militia, so the amendment does not clearly address gun rights (except in the context of our need for a militia). That said, like many liberals, I have come around to believe in gun rights, provided there are appropriate background checks. I also think that having laws in place to arrest bad guys simply for having guns is helpful when evidence of a specific crime is weak.
Patters is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2009, 09:33 AM   #4
Banned
 

Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 4,981
Default Re: Time to strike down Chicago's handgun ban?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Patters View Post
I also think that having laws in place to arrest bad guys simply for having guns is helpful when evidence of a specific crime is weak.
what the hell does this mean?
tanked_as_usual is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2009, 10:04 AM   #5
In the Starting Line-up
 
State's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,408
My Mood: Relaxed
Default Re: Time to strike down Chicago's handgun ban?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Patters View Post
Of course there's that troublesome part in the second amendment about "A well regulated militia."
That dog has been buried with the Heller decision.

Besides, haven't you ever read Longfellow's "Paul Revere's Ride"? Every able-bodied male was considered part of the militia. I'm backed up on that by historian Joyce Lee Malcolm.

Source: http://www.potowmack.org/malcolm.html

(Not that you bother to check sources.)
State is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2009, 10:09 AM   #6
Look Up, It's Amazing
 
Harry Boy's Avatar
 

Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 33,797
Default Re: Time to strike down Chicago's handgun ban?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Patters View Post
Of course there's that troublesome part in the seconed amendment about "A well regulated militia." That seems to imply the right to regulate the militia. There was feeling at the time that the US did not need a military, and that the people themselves, collectively, would simply join together to fight any foe. In that case, you would them need arms and a well-regulated militia. Well, the fact is things changed, and we know we need a military but not a militia, so the amendment does not clearly address gun rights (except in the context of our need for a militia). That said, like many liberals, I have come around to believe in gun rights, provided there are appropriate background checks. I also think that having laws in place to arrest bad guys simply for having guns is helpful when evidence of a specific crime is weak.
Obama controls the Military, we very well may need a Militia, the American People will allow a Socialist leader with Dictator aspirations to go just so far then the Militia will take over and save the country.
__________________
Harry Boy (Genius)

In The Absence Of Law And Order Society Will Surely Destroy Itself
Harry Boy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2009, 10:17 AM   #7
Moderator
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 16,335
My Mood: Mellow
Default Re: Time to strike down Chicago's handgun ban?

Quote:
Originally Posted by State View Post
That dog has been buried with the Heller decision.

Besides, haven't you ever read Longfellow's "Paul Revere's Ride"? Every able-bodied male was considered part of the militia. I'm backed up on that by historian Joyce Lee Malcolm.

Source: http://www.potowmack.org/malcolm.html

(Not that you bother to check sources.)
My point is we went with a military instead. In the idealistic days when the Constitution was written, there was a feeling that if attacked, every able bodied American would simply take up arms. But, things didn't work out that way. Our main line of defense is the military. We do not really have a militia right now, except perhaps the NG. I think the second amendment is anachronistic, so it doesn't really apply anymore, but as I said I do think that responsible people should be allowed to own guns provided there are background checks.

I think guns are like drugs -- many of them are fine and are or should be legal. Some are not fine, and should not be legal. I tend to support the views of police organizations, though, when it gets down to the nitty-gritty details. I know in the past, many police groups opposed the broad availability of some assault weapons. Since they're the ones who would be in the line of fire, I support them on that.
Patters is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2009, 10:59 AM   #8
In the Starting Line-up
 
State's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,408
My Mood: Relaxed
Default Re: Time to strike down Chicago's handgun ban?

Police are less threatened than cab drivers and those third shift convenience store clerks, according to statistics I've read.

Of course in so-called "Gun Free Zones," that's a great place for a whackjob to take out a lot of people. Pinelake Health and Rehab: More killings in ‘gun free’ zones

That's seven dead in a shooting everyone's forgotten about, although it was not even three months ago.

The Holocaust (Shoah) Museum shooting in DC is very different in that the perp was incredibly old (88) and went after armed security. I figure he wanted to die to make a "statement." His twisted thinking.

He also was armed only with a .22 rifle. The guard who was killed opened the door for him and was totally unprepared for what the old man was doing.

As a Jew, I'm intending on becoming a member of a Jewish gun rights organization I've admired from afar since the summer of 1990, Jews for the Preservation of Firearms Ownership

Last edited by State; 06-12-2009 at 11:01 AM.. Reason: Shoah "calamity" misspelled
State is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2009, 11:03 AM   #9
In the Starting Line-up
 
State's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,408
My Mood: Relaxed
Default Re: Time to strike down Chicago's handgun ban?

Of course, gun control was initiated in an effort to keep guns out of the hands of Negroes.

Explosive video -- JPFO - "No Guns for Negroes"

Gotta "keep them in their place"? Freedom destroys dhimmitude.
State is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Sponsored Links



Thread Tools
Display Modes


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Best of all time debate madinsomniac PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum 74 01-17-2011 12:17 AM
Newsmax: Israeli strike on Iran imminent PressCoverage Political Discussion 16 01-14-2009 04:41 PM
Time rejected Rove PressCoverage Political Discussion 13 11-24-2007 08:04 AM
The time has come... patfanken PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum 35 11-07-2007 05:55 PM
Amusing Possible Outcome for the Colts Keegs PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum 25 11-06-2007 04:40 PM



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:53 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2

© Copyright 2000-2012. PatsFans.com Is a Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties.
The opinions posted in this forum do not necessarily reflect the opinions of our staff at PatsFans.com or USA Today.
We are not affiliated with the New England Patriots™ or the NFL™. The Photo Used In the header was taken by Ian Logue.

This site is owned and operated by I&K Internet Design Enterprises, LLC


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563