ALERT: The Obama birth certificate protection act - New England Patriots Forums

***NEPatriot*** · 05-25-2009, 11:39 AM

Revealed: The Obama birth certificate protection act

Quote:

WASHINGTON – A bill approved by the House of Representatives and referred to the Senate would prohibit federal employees of executive branch from being compelled to release any document unless a court makes a specified determination by a preponderance of evidence – legislation at least one group suspects is designed to protect Barack Obama's elusive birth certificate from release.

The legislation, HR 985, resides in the Senate Judiciary Committee. Sovereignty Alliance has issued a "red alert" about the bill it calls "stealth legislation ... to protect Obama from providing his birth certificate."

This is what I call 'democratic'. This Obama birth certificate thing is REAL. Look at what democrats are doing behind the door. They want to PROTECT Obama. They don't want him to release his REAL birth certificate.

***Michael*** · 05-25-2009, 12:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NEPatriot

Revealed: The Obama birth certificate protection act

This is what I call 'democratic'. This Obama birth certificate thing is REAL. Look at what democrats are doing behind the door. They want to PROTECT Obama. They don't want him to release his REAL birth certificate.

He's all about "transparency".

He should just be like Pelosi and say I don't want to talk about that anymore and the MSM will of course ask no more questions.

***NEPatriot*** · 05-25-2009, 12:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Michael

He's all about "transparency".

He should just be like Pelosi and say I don't want to talk about that anymore and the MSM will of course ask no more questions.

What do we learn? We learned one thing: his ONLINE BC was a piece of ***** and whoever believed in it was a MORON. You would think that this BC issue is going to go away AFTER Obama spent million dollars to STOP it. Perhaps, he needs to spend trillion dollars to do it because he didn't do a good job at protecting his arse.

Why the hell did Democrats not do it last year so that Obama could save his million dollars?

Talk about a conspiracy story!

***shmessy*** · 05-25-2009, 12:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NEPatriot

What do we learn? We learned one thing: his ONLINE BC was a piece of ***** and whoever believed in it was a MORON. You would think that this BC issue is going to go away AFTER Obama spent million dollars to STOP it. Perhaps, he needs to spend trillion dollars to do it because he didn't do a good job at protecting his arse.

Why the hell did Democrats not do it last year so that Obama could save his million dollars?

Talk about a conspiracy story!

Maybe you should declare "Marshall Law"

***NEPatriot*** · 05-25-2009, 12:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by shmessy

Maybe you should declare "Marshall Law"

It's comming and your Obama will make it happen.

When it happens, please remember that I TOLD YOU SO.

mikey · 05-25-2009, 12:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by shmessy

Maybe you should declare "Marshall Law"

I believe it's called "Martial Law".

.

***DarrylS*** · 05-25-2009, 12:53 PM

Before the righties get their depends in a bunch.. remember the Civics Course..

Laws cannot be passed retroactively so it does not apply to Obama

If you are interested in the actual bill..here is a link:

Search Results - THOMAS (Library of Congress)

There are 4 versions of this bill, a quick glance is that this has more to do with the press than BC's.

***NEPatriot*** · 05-25-2009, 01:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DarrylS

Before the righties get their depends in a bunch.. remember the Civics Course..

Laws cannot be passed retroactively so it does not apply to Obama

If you are interested in the actual bill..here is a link:

Search Results - THOMAS (Library of Congress)

There are 4 versions of this bill, a quick glance is that this has more to do with the press than BC's.

It doesn't apply to Obama if you don't believe that he is in charge of the EXECUTIVE BRANCH or a member of it.

***DarrylS*** · 05-25-2009, 01:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NEPatriot

It doesn't apply to Obama if you don't believe that he is in charge of the EXECUTIVE BRANCH or a member of it.

You are a complete idiot.. continually make no sense at all.. take a basic civics course... if a law was passed retroactively the SCOTUS would be on it like flies to crap.

***NEPatriot*** · 05-25-2009, 01:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DarrylS

You are a complete idiot.. continually make no sense at all.. take a basic civics course... if a law was passed retroactively the SCOTUS would be on it like flies to crap.

Do you realize how idiot you are? Let me ask you this question

How many passed 'retroactived laws' have you seen SCOTUS being on it?

Let me remind you one thing. It was SCOTUS which REFUSED to hear OBAMA'S BC case last year.

It is the only reason for you to use 'IF' because it's not going to happen.