ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW
Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!
I am making this thread because I am so *****ing pissed at all these douchebags reporters who are literally on their knees to Peyton Manning.
Can someone please explain how in the name of god can some turd throw 6 interceptions and lose, yet be credited by leading his team to a comeback? HE LOST!!!! HE *****ING LOST!!!! HE didn't lead his team back. HE LOST TO THE SAN DIEGO *****ING CHARGERS!!!!!! A comeback would be losing by 10 with under 9 minutes left against the Colts and somehow win! Yet Tom Brady gets no credit. BECAUSE TOM BRADY ACTUALLY CAN MAKE A COMEBACK.
The nippleheads say that he struggled without Harrison or Clark. O BOO HOO!!! He STILL HAD Addai and Wayne. God forbid he doesn't have a future HOFer. Doesn't that statement alone mean he is a product of his receivers. I CANNOT BELEIVE THE FACT that these idiots still think the Colts can win, and if their binkie throws 1000 int, he still had a great game.
And then there is Bill Polian! Can someone explain to me how the hell this guy is on any sort of committee. Isn't it a conflict of interest that he is on the board for this first place. This guy *****es that his receivers get touched, new rule. He complains about fricken mascots, new rule. His team gets 99% of boarderline calls, and he gets screwed on one call, his kicker missed a 29 yarder, and somehow he *****es. POLIAN (Please be quiet - edited)!!!!! Don't whine because you lost.
God, I am so sick of these Colts homers. They lose yet somehow they are great. Manning sucks and throws 6 INT yet he has the edge on Tom Brady. I know my team is better and the Dolts are whiny *****es, but I can't stand this crap.
__________________
"Randy Moss is a player whose skills are diminishing, and he's in denial of those eroding skills. Randy was a great receiver, but he lacked the work ethic and the desire to cultivate any skills that would compensate for what he was losing physically later in his career."
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!
Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.
NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98
I am making this thread because I am so *****ing pissed at all these douchebags reporters who are literally on their knees to Peyton Manning.
God, I am so sick of these Colts homers. They lose yet somehow they are great. Manning sucks and throws 6 INT yet he has the edge on Tom Brady. I know my team is better and the Dolts are whiny *****es, but I can't stand this crap.
Why the giant change of heart since last night when you couldn't understand why the rest of us took great joy in Cold Hard Football Facts ripping Dr. Z for doing what you're claiming is now driving you nuts now?
__________________
"When Peyton Manning was a kid he used to go to bed at night and dream about throwing the winning touchdown for the Saints in the Superbowl. And on Sunday he did."
There's only two conclusions for Patriots fans on rookies. They are either a bust or being fitted for their bust in Canton.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Why the giant change of heart since last night when you couldn't understand why the rest of us took great joy in Cold Hard Football Facts ripping Dr. Z for doing what you're claiming is now driving you nuts now?
I read it, and it helped. But after hearing Clayton I started to get chest pains.
__________________
"Randy Moss is a player whose skills are diminishing, and he's in denial of those eroding skills. Randy was a great receiver, but he lacked the work ethic and the desire to cultivate any skills that would compensate for what he was losing physically later in his career."
Doesn't anyone here remember Peyton's "media image" up until February of last year? He even poked fun at it on SNL after the Superbowl. Anyone in any other sport who had talent & stats but 'couldn't win the big one' was the "Peyton Manning of tennis, basketball, skating, etc."
Peyton was "the choker."
So, naturally, there was a repreive on that after he finally did win "the big one," and even some celebration, because a lot of people don't like to see a guy get saddled with a reputation like that - it becomes an underdog story. That has carried over to this season.
And it's not like Brady is without love. He's getting tons of praise this season.
You realize that whining about Manning's success is no different than all the fan losers of the other 31 teams b!tching and moaning about the Patriots success.
As BB would say, "It is what it is." and "It's not something we can control."
__________________
Throughout history, poverty is the normal condition of man. Advances which permit this norm to be exceeded — here and there, now and then — are the work of an extremely small minority, frequently despised, often condemned, and almost always opposed by all right-thinking people. Whenever this tiny minority is kept from creating, or (as sometimes happens) is driven out of a society, the people then slip back into abject poverty.
This is known as "bad luck." RAH
I completely agree with you, but my problem is that his success wasn't a success, HE LOST THE GAME and they still are sucking him off.........that's the problem......
He is a great QB and one of the best of all-time, but when he has a bad game it needs to be written that he had a bad game. It doesn't need to talk about how valiant he was throwing six INT's. The defense kept them into and got them back in that game. End of story.
I completely agree with you, but my problem is that his success wasn't a success, HE LOST THE GAME and they still are sucking him off.........that's the problem......
He is a great QB and one of the best of all-time, but when he has a bad game it needs to be written that he had a bad game. It doesn't need to talk about how valiant he was throwing six INT's. The defense kept them into and got them back in that game. End of story.
They did the same thing w/ Romo after his 6 turnover performance against the Bills. The ONLY difference is that his kicker made the longer field goal at the end, and Peyton's missed the chip shot.
Besides, most articles I'm reading now are saying things like "after his terrible performance against the Chargers," etc.