12-13-2012, 08:01 AM
|
#23
|
|
In the Starting Line-up
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 2,247
|
Re: Jerod Mayo
Quote:
Originally Posted by mayoclinic
San Francisco, obviously. But some of your other suggestions are a little dubious:
- Baltimore, with an aging and injured Ray Lewis; McClain is nothing special; Kruger has emerged as a good player, but not all world, and Upshaw is emerging, but I'll take Hightower. I'll take the Patriots' group any day.
- Dallas: Ware is all world. Lee is great, but he's on IR so it's not much of a comparison. Carter's never shown any consistency, and Spencer has been hot and cold. +/-
- Miami: Really? Wake sure, though he's a bit one-dimensional for my taste. Dansby is solid, but not better than Spikes or Mayo. Misi and Burnett are nothing special.
Even for the Steelers, Harrison is getting well past his prime and Foote is definitely at the end of his career.
I wouldn't anoint this group "best" yet, but they're certainly on their way to being one of the top groups in the NFL. A little depth would help, though if Dane Fletcher hadn't gotten hurt we might be better still.
|
Usually i agree with you on most things but in this case i personally think there may be a bit of home fan bias here.
I am not saying we are bad but i do believe the LB corps i listed if you asked most NFL people are a better bunch as of today than ours. The Steelers and Ravens LB's may be past their peak but they are still the strength of that D and i personally believe only one maybe 2 of our LB's would start on those teams. Same goes with KC and to a lesser extent Miami but i really only threw them in as an example of another solid line backing corps with a different strength to ours but one who non the less has been performing really well all year.
|
|
|