Brady_to_Moss

Last time ravens lost back to back IIRC was in 09. So they play well after a loss just like the pats..should be interesting. Wish is was at gillete however

PATRIOTSFANINPA

Like in all cases of top teams in the same conference,when they clash ....90% of the teams that win these games are teams that win the LOS

The battle of the trenches will decide this game....not Brady,not Flacco per say.

Scary thing is that Baltimore is arguably better on their DL but definately better with thier OL,so advantage goes to Baltimore......on paper.

Brady_to_Moss

which is why this game could decided #1 or #2 seed at the end of the year..a bye or no bye ect

houston will be another one of these games

PATRIOTSFANINPA

If another star player doesn't go down by the Houston game,then Aaron will be back,we will be at home and feeling a bit better about that game then this weeks one,I guarantee you.

It's rare when a Belichick/Brady team goes below .500.......those chances of it look scary good this weekend.

Brady_to_Moss

but out of 3 games below .500 isn't panic mode...if they are .500 at week 10 then yes...panic. But after balt the schedule does get easier. So a 1-2 start shouldn't panic you although the board will have 43 dumb threads if they lose sunday and the jets win (which they will)leading the division. But leading the division after 3 games means nothing but their fan base will say otherwise.


I was just over at the ravens forum...some are confident..but others not really

Brady_to_Moss

No suggs...and maybe no pollard? We know no AH. Hopefully more welker sunday night

condon84

If we come out, spread the field, hurry up offense and stop trying to change who we are, then I like our chances. We now have a defense that we've all been asking for who can get off the field and give our offense more possessions, why change up? Very silly IMO.

Brady_to_Moss

We need a big game from ridley in order to win i think

condon84

Our running game does well when defenses are anticipating a pass. We still don't have the OL that can open up holes when defenses know we are going to run. That was evident today. We just don't have those types of guys. I think it's silly to try to force them into becoming that kind of unit.

The offense we've been running the past few years has run roughshod against almost everyone in the league. We lost games not because of our offense, but because our defense couldn't get off the field. Now that we have a D that can give our O more opportunity, why change what worked on O?

This is a gamble that is unnecessary.

PatsGirl2011

I think they need more Welker and Gronk to win.