OhExaulted1

I didn't realize you were a coach. Thanks for that revelation.

__________________
I've visited the inner sanctum

Deus Irae

__________________
"The object in life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane."
- Marcus Aurelius

Ive_Killed_People

I think Tate's production will be up 100% next year. I predict 1 catch.

OhExaulted1

Troll? Really? I've been on this site since 2000. GFY. Damn you Deus, you got me aggravated enough to throw a "like" at "Ive Killed People". Go out and volunteer to coach some kids and step away from the keyboard. PS-Ive Killed Peolple-find another name...seriously.

__________________
I've visited the inner sanctum

patsfaninpittsburgh

patsfaninpittsburgh had benefit of a Massachusetts education.

Back in the day, mathematics was taught to patsfaninpittsburgh.

It's called looking at numbers through four games and realizing that in a sixteen game season,you like can multiple (prorate) by four.

Work through it with patsfaninpittsburgh.

Week One through Four in 2010 with Moss.

Tate receptions 4/1/2/4=11

Multiple 11 by 4 (16/4=4) and that "prorates" to 44.

It may look like Jedi mindtricks but it's called addition and multiplication.

patsfaninpittsburgh

Ahhhhh...maybe because he was like cut by the Patriots and picked up by Cincy right before the start of the season so like there wasn't alot of time to like incorporate him into the offense.

Ya know Cincy had like a rookie QB, rookie WR, and some established receivers.

Now with a full offseason, Cincy can like use it to try to incorporate Tate into their offense.

Ya know, Cincy doing what NFL teams do in like the offseason.

Also, please refer to patsfaninpittsburgh's response to Andy Johnson's rather curious question to patsfaninpittsburgh's earlier comment.

Please also notice patsfaninpittsburgh's comprehensive and in-depth statistical and mathametical discertation on the Tate's performance with Randy Moss as a Patriot as a guide to infer why Cincy may be following this course of action.

Ive_Killed_People

My name is part of a quote from Eastbound And Down:
--------------------------------------
Stevie:You're so f***ing bad***, Kenny. Man, you're so ****ing--
You say, "You ****ing mess with me, I throw a brick in your face!"

Kenny Powers:Smashing a brick through a dude's window...
...is nothing compared to the things I've done, I've killed people.
--------------------------------------
So relax I'm not actually a killer

OhExaulted1

Nothing personal IKP. I've seen it. That's why I dropped a like.But if I need someone......Ahh nevermind.. You're all good! Smile MF!

__________________
I've visited the inner sanctum

AndyJohnson

It would appear that education failed you.
First you said 40-50 catch 600 yard 4-6 TD season.
Even using the small sample while ignore real life (more on that later) those 11 receptions added up to just 135 yards which wont get you to the 600 you want to give him credit for 'would have gotten', and what is 0 TDs x 4?

More to the point, he actually played the next 12 games. In those he caught only 13 passes, with a high of 3 and 4 games of ZERO plus 4 games of 1 catch.
Of course those 13 are also his total in his last 28 games.

patsfaninpittsburgh

Andy

Is this your annual, "I'm going to be completely obtuse so I can get some attention from patsfaninpittsburgh because his schooling of me last year during the lockout was a great benefit to me"?

Your "more to the point" is a complete zero point.

135x4= 540 yards.
540 yards close to 600 yards
600 picked because of being round numbered. patsfaninpittsburgh don't want to confuse you with a "big number". It's easier to comprehend a round number.

Stay on point here, Andy.

Tate did catch TD passes in 2010........

Now...............

Work with patsfaninpittsburgh here.

Moss= big, tall "#1" receiver
Green= big, tall "#1" receiver
Week five through seventeen 2010= No Moss/Green type receiver on Patriots.

Moss timeframe= level of performance
Non Moss timeframe= another level of performance
Cincy timeframe that mimics "Moss timeframe"= predict the level of performance.

The reality is past history is the best guide for predicting future performance.

That may seem Mensa to you but some call it common sense.