ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW
Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!
Ok, I've got to ask.... Are you writing this crap because you're clueless, or because you're trolling? The Patriots ran the ball for 130+ in 4 of the last 6 games played in the 2007 season. The only 2 games during that stretch where they didn't get 130+?
Yes, indeed..... the two Giants games.
In fact, during the season, the Patriots ran for 130+ in 10 of 19 games.
Ok, you're clueless...
At this point, you're just a waste of time until you learn a little bit about the game.
Greetings,
You are right on this one. I remember to start the season Sammy Morris was on a great roll and then he was injured and missed the rest of the season. I think it was the Monday Night game against the Bengals. Also at that point Maroney was hurt as well, so for a while their was not much at runningback.
I also remember Maroney came back later in the season and many Patriot fans were getting real excited about him again, he looked like he could develop into a Pro-Bowler at the end of that year and the playoffs. The next year they set a Patriots record for rushing yards in a season with their running back by commitee approach, with JMD as their cordinator.
Celticboy04
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!
Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.
NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98
That's your opinion. I'm just saying that's what you can expect to happen when he's the OC for 3 superbowls.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rob0729
Yet, Cassell had more yards, a better completion rating, only 6 less TDs, and only 4 more INTs in 2008 when it was the first year he started since high school.
lol "only 6 less TDs, and only 4 more INTs"
He also had a better line, better receivers, and a much easier schedule in 2008. He's been an abject failure in KC outside of when Weis was his OC.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rob0729
In 2003, the Pats had Branch, Patten, Troy, and Givens. In 2006, the Pats had Caldwell, Gaffney (who sucked until the playoffs), and Doug Gabriel. The 2003 offense wasn't that good. The 2006 should have been horrible with the receivers Brady had and no healthy consistent RBs.
David Patten played in 6 games total in 2003, while Branch and Givens were both in their 2nd season. Troy Brown was basically as productive in 2006 as he was in 2003 so idk why you didn't list him for the 2006 team. Additionally, they had nothing at running back. Antowain Smith in his 30s and Kevin Faulk. The 2006 team had much better running backs than the 2003 team. There's a reason they never ran the ball in 2003.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rob0729
What does that have to do with anything? McDaniels got very good production from Kyle Orton in Denver eventhough he sucked as a head coach.
Too bad that "production" didn't lead to any wins.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rob0729
Weis had to tuck his tail between his legs and go to KC after totally failing in ND.
Weis had two great years at ND and actually made Brady Quinn look like an NFL QB. He got a huge extension after that then lasted 3 more seasons. His failure at Notre Dame pails in comparison to McDaniels not even finishing his 2nd season in Denver while in the process dismantling Denver's roster. Unlike McDaniels, Weis was extremely successful in his job after Notre Dame. St. Louis's offense hugely regressed this year.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rob0729
He wasn't completely unprepared. The Pats just couldn't run the ball because the o-line collapsed and the could barely throw either.
Sounds pretty unprepared to me.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rob0729
You do realize the Pats scored the same amount of point on Sunday than they did in the McDaniels' Super Bowl? And Brady was fine until late.
They scored 17 points on Sunday and 14 points in the McDaniels superbowl. I wasn't aware 14 is the same amount as 17.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rob0729
Besides, I am not the one judging an entire career as the Patriots' head coach on one game.
I'm not judging Bill Belichick's career based off one game.
Ok, I've got to ask.... Are you writing this crap because you're clueless, or because you're trolling?
I'm writing this "crap" because it's hilarious watching people try to defend McDaniels' performance in SB 42, or his performance in Denver for that matter.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rob0729
Ok, you're clueless...
At this point, you're just a waste of time until you learn a little bit about the game.
Yup, that's it, I'm clueless. The offense being unable to execute a screen play isn't the offensive coordinator's fault at all!
I really do hope I'm wrong about McDaniels and hopefully his experiences in Denver and St. Louis have humbled him a little bit but I don't trust what changes he's gonna bring in to the offense. Getting a "deep threat" isn't something I see being successful.
I'm writing this "crap" because it's hilarious watching people try to defend McDaniels' performance in SB 42, or his performance in Denver for that matter.
No, you're writing the crap you're writing because you don't know what the hell you're talking about. I'd originally wondered if you were trolling, but subsequent parts of your posts convinced me that it's a matter of your lack of knowledge, or poor application of such knowledge, rather than the deliberate tweaking of others.
__________________
"The object in life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane."
- Marcus Aurelius
The Patriots bread and butter with Welker in the slot and two TE's is YAC. You don't get YAC in a gridlock situation. They need 1 or preferable 2 WR who can stretch the field horizontally, because Brady won't be upright long enough to benefit from vertically. And they need a RB teams have to game plan against so they can't single mindedly focus on stopping Brady and the short passing game.
Charlie wouldn't do any better here today than Josh or BOB. Different game and different era, different personnel and skillsets. That bullseye wasn't firmly planted on this team or this QB's back until after Charlie was long gone to ND. And Belichick was spending as much time with the offense as defense back then. On the sideline het altered the only play Charlie called that resulted in an offensive TD for the NEP in XXXVI. Charlie had a better balanced offense to work with in XXXVIII and especially XXXIX with Dillon onboard, the still cagey Brown in the slot, Branch and Givens, above average TE's compared to 2001, and a defense that could still make a stop. And yet we won each by a FG.
This is fine and all, but Miles Austin and Julio Jones aren't walking through that door.
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
No, you're writing the crap you're writing because you don't know what the hell you're talking about. I'd originally wondered if you were trolling, but subsequent parts of your posts convinced me that it's a matter of your lack of knowledge, or poor application of such knowledge, rather than the deliberate tweaking of others.
1) Whether or not I'm intentionally trolling you're very butthurt over McDaniels' 14 point performance in superbowl 42. I wasn't aware it was arguably the best 14 point offensive showing in NFL history.
2) The fact you're only argument is an ad-hominem attack on how I lack knowledge about Josh McDaniels also tells me you don't know very much either tbh.
I'm going to say one more thing and be done with this argument. Go back and look at the play by play for the Patriots/Eagles Super Bowl. The Pats' offense went three and out like six times in that game. Yet, that makes Weis a genius and McDaniels and O'Brien morons. I guess they were quality three and outs.
I think adding Matt Forte would be a MUST! Our running game isn't keeping D Coordinators up at nite. Forte would be a BEAST for us. When we had A Smith & C Dillion we won championships. We have to keep D honest.
Also locking up Welker via Tag or FA $igning cutting ties with Ocho adding Lloyd or Colston or Both. Don't know if its feesable with cap and our other needs on Defense but Forte/Welker/Colston/Lloyd/TE Duo Is Down Right SCARY!
I'm sure McDaniels would be a kid in a candy store with that to work with.
So the answer to improving the patriots is too sign 4 top free agents on offense: Welker, Forte, Lloyd and Colston????/????????
I agree that our offense would be better with this re-signing and three additions.
I agree that McDaniels would a happy camper.
============================
SUGGESTION
If we really have enough cap room to sign FOUR major free agents, perhaps ONE of them should be on defense. Perhaps we should re-sign Andre Carter and Anderson or their replacements.
Quote:
Originally Posted by DaBronxPats14
I think adding Matt Forte would be a MUST! Our running game isn't keeping D Coordinators up at nite. Forte would be a BEAST for us. When we had A Smith & C Dillion we won championships. We have to keep D honest.
Also locking up Welker via Tag or FA $igning cutting ties with Ocho adding Lloyd or Colston or Both. Don't know if its feesable with cap and our other needs on Defense but Forte/Welker/Colston/Lloyd/TE Duo Is Down Right SCARY!
I'm sure McDaniels would be a kid in a candy store with that to work with.