signbabybrady

http://www.boston.com/sports/footbal...ts_throug.html

Kinda funny they both did there version of what they think of Camp so far and Reiss points out a pleasant surprise being the Secondary and specifically Bryant. Gasper says he is a little disapointed by the secondary specifically that no one has stood out but he did say the only guy who seems to have stood out a little more than others was Bryant.

So they agree on Bryant but disagree on the secondary as a whole.

interesting to see such differing views on the same blog post.

__________________

PatsWickedPissah

I see it this way. If you're in the secondary and you have to face Brady, Moss & Welker every day, you shouldn't look stellar.

__________________
Throughout history, poverty is the normal condition of man. Advances which permit this norm to be exceeded — here and there, now and then — are the work of an extremely small minority, frequently despised, often condemned, and almost always opposed by all right-thinking people. Whenever this tiny minority is kept from creating, or (as sometimes happens) is driven out of a society, the people then slip back into abject poverty.
This is known as "bad luck." RAH

363839

Moss and Welker have not been playing from what I've read.
The second string receiver corp is not doing too well against
this secondary.

Canada's #1 Pats Fan

Would some of our 2nd stringers be starters on other teams?

363839

Gaffney could definitely start on some teams.
I realize he is the # 3 in NE but Jackson could beat him out.
Anyways Gaff was with the unit that was being handled by the secondary
though it was stated that he is doing very well in camp.

Chad Jackson is still a question mark with big upside.
No one else could start anywhere, I think.