Ventrone at WR: a theory - New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard
NEWS
|
FORUM
|
PHOTOS
|
VIDEOS
|
FULL STATS DATABASE
|
PODCAST
|
RUMOR MILL
Get Social With PatsFans.com
Early Roster Projection
Ryan's Journey Started Early
POST DRAFT PODCAST

Go Back   New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard > PatsFans.com Forums > PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum
Forgot Password? Join PatsFans.com!
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Arcade Mark Forums Read Chat Room

WELCOME TO OUR FORUM HERE AT PATSFANS.COM!
ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW

Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-16-2008, 01:59 PM   #1
PatsFans.com Supporter
 
ctpatsfan77's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Fairfield County, CT
Posts: 17,579
My Mood: Grumpy
Default Ventrone at WR: a theory

After all, if you think about it, it just doesn't make a whole lot of sense--it's hard to imagine any personnel grouping where Ventrone at WR would be a top target for Brady (or Cassel or Gutierrez or O'Connell).

That said, I have a hypothesis as to why they might want to try this. It depends, of course, on Ventrone's best skill--his ability to hit like a mule.

If you go back and re-watch some of the games (e.g., Redskins), you'll see that, in the running game, the Patriots frequently deploy Welker as a blocker. Basically, I think the Pats are hoping that Ventrone might be able to fill in that role, so that they don't have to overuse Welker, and can work on running out the clock. The advantage to this is that it doesn't require that Ventrone be better than Gaffney or Jackson, just that he be at least a credible threat.

Yeah, I could just be completely off-base, but, again, it seems like a more plausible explanation than trying to turn Ventrone into "only" an 8th or 9th WR.

Thoughts?
__________________
"Momentum was quickly snatched away by New England, who once again proved that any Patriot, at any moment, can make a play." —Inside the NFL, Packers v. Patriots

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
ctpatsfan77 is offline  
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!

Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account
including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.

NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98

Updated 07/08/11

Help Us Reach Our Goal!

Old 07-16-2008, 02:03 PM   #2
In the Starting Line-up
 

Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,008
Default Re: Ventrone at WR: a theory

I don't know if they are looking for him to serve any real purpose, in-game, with snaps at WR.

They've experimented with Childress (a WR) at CB, Willie Andrews (a DB) at WR, Ventrone at WR, drafted Slater (a DB/WR/KR) - I think they just value the versatility of these athletes who project more as special teamers. If they can give you more jobs than just the one or two, they are more valuable to the roster.
__________________
I don't like Dungy and that's because he [was] the head coach of the Colts. Period. End of question. The degree to which I like a player or coach is predicated solely on the color of the laundry they wear on Sunday. When fans admit this and stop bashing players and coaches for any other reason, the world of sports will be infinitely improved.
bradmahn is offline  
Old 07-16-2008, 02:35 PM   #3
In the Starting Line-up
 
Metaphors's Avatar
 

Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 3,662
Default Re: Ventrone at WR: a theory

I think that Ventrone needs to win a spot on special teams. That gets him on the field on gameday. Then your scenario becomes a lot more plausible. I don't think there is room on the roster for a "specialist" WR...particularly with CJack getting a lot of blocking duty in 2006.
Metaphors is offline  
Old 07-16-2008, 02:45 PM   #4
In the Starting Line-up
 
Palm Beach Pats Fan's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 2,865
My Mood: Busy
Default Re: Ventrone at WR: a theory

It never hurts to explore the versatility of backups, even those deep on the roster.

Sure it's unlikely that three guys among Moss, Welker, Jackson, and Gaffney all go down with injuries, but is that so much more implausible than all of the defensive secondary getting hurt a few years back, making Troy Brown a starting cornerback?

It might be the 1% (or less) chance scenario, but our coaches are prepared so that even those bizarre possibilities are covered.
Palm Beach Pats Fan is offline  
Old 07-16-2008, 02:57 PM   #5
In the Starting Line-up
 

Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 3,092
My Mood: Cynical
Default Re: Ventrone at WR: a theory

I wouldn't read too much into where a Fringe Player like Ventrone lines up in June. He's just a body right now. Given the younger, faster players brought in who can play ST, I doubt he makes the team.
tombonneau is offline  
Old 07-16-2008, 03:02 PM   #6
Experienced Starter w/First Big Contract
 
dryheat44's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: NOVA
Posts: 6,156
Default Re: Ventrone at WR: a theory

Quote:
Originally Posted by ctpatsfan77 View Post
Yeah, I could just be completely off-base, but, again, it seems like a more plausible explanation than trying to turn Ventrone into "only" an 8th or 9th WR.

Thoughts?
The plausible scenario is so Ventrone can help at practice by serving as a scout team WR. As an offense, you want Welker on the field every time there are three receivers. If you start taking him out and replacing him with Ventrone to run certain plays, you're tipping your hand.
__________________
When it's third and 10, you can have the milk drinkers and I'll take the whiskey drinkers every time. -- R.I.P. Max McGee
dryheat44 is offline  
Old 07-16-2008, 03:20 PM   #7
Practice Squad
 
mdhprime's Avatar
 

Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 354
Default Re: Ventrone at WR: a theory

With the current depth at WR I do not think Ventrone would be a likely WR candidate. As far as lining him up to block al la Welker, well then your kind of giving the secret up...
mdhprime is offline  
Old 07-16-2008, 03:24 PM   #8
PatsFans.com Supporter
 
PatsWickedPissah's Avatar
 

Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: New Hampster!
Posts: 19,385
My Mood: Grumpy
Default Re: Ventrone at WR: a theory

Quote:
Originally Posted by dryheat44 View Post
The plausible scenario is so Ventrone can help at practice by serving as a scout team WR. As an offense, you want Welker on the field every time there are three receivers. If you start taking him out and replacing him with Ventrone to run certain plays, you're tipping your hand.
Remember that BB's Pats make a big deal with awards to players who make good contributions during game prep week as 'scout team' players. Ventrone could play a role as a scout physical style WR.
__________________
Throughout history, poverty is the normal condition of man. Advances which permit this norm to be exceeded — here and there, now and then — are the work of an extremely small minority, frequently despised, often condemned, and almost always opposed by all right-thinking people. Whenever this tiny minority is kept from creating, or (as sometimes happens) is driven out of a society, the people then slip back into abject poverty.
This is known as "bad luck." RAH
PatsWickedPissah is online now  
Old 07-16-2008, 03:25 PM   #9
Veteran Starter w/Big Long Term Deal
 
signbabybrady's Avatar
 

Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Foxboro
Posts: 8,297
My Mood: Buzzed
Default Re: Ventrone at WR: a theory

Quote:
Originally Posted by mdhprime View Post
With the current depth at WR I do not think Ventrone would be a likely WR candidate. As far as lining him up to block al la Welker, well then your kind of giving the secret up...
Yeah using another tight end would be more covert than that and should be a better blocker.
__________________
"We go down to New Orleans, and ain't anybody give us a chance? Nobody! And what did we say to them?"

"DON'T TALK TO ME!!!"
signbabybrady is online now  
Old 07-16-2008, 03:37 PM   #10
Third String But Playing on Special Teams
 
BRiZ's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Mass
Posts: 817
Default Re: Ventrone at WR: a theory

how about turning Watson into a ILB i like that better.

6'3" 255 (perfect size for inside)

can bench press 500 lbs (shed lineman anyone?)

4.44 40-yard dash (faster than RBs, can run down Champ Bailey anyone?)

good hands can catch the ball (interceptions anyone?)

knows TEs routes and other WR routes (flip the script, use it on D to defend)

41 Wonderlic score (smarter than QBs, could learn BB's defense anyone?)

Imagine Mayo on the weakside inside and Watson on the strongside inside.

Borderline godly.
__________________
~Current Pats Mock~
Trades:
- Pats trade #7 to Carolina (Ryan) for #13(Rd 1) & #43(Rd 2)
- Pats trade #62(Rd 2) & #69(Rd 3) to Atlanta for #37(Rd 2)


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
BRiZ is offline  
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Sponsored Links



Thread Tools
Display Modes


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:26 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2

© Copyright 2000-2012. PatsFans.com Is a Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties.
The opinions posted in this forum do not necessarily reflect the opinions of our staff at PatsFans.com or USA Today.
We are not affiliated with the New England Patriots™ or the NFL™. The Photo Used In the header was taken by Ian Logue.

This site is owned and operated by I&K Internet Design Enterprises, LLC