ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW
Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!
There is a thread about Dan Dierdorf and it made me think about Gil and Gino as the Pats announcers. I have been listening to them, off and on, throughout the years, and these last couple of years I have been traveling more for work and therefore have been "forced" to listen to them more in order to catch the Pats. While I respect what they have done in the past, I think its time for them to hang it up. Gil flubs alot of calls, and if he gets around to identifying the Pats receiver who caught the ball before the play is over it's a miracle. Gino reminds me now of John Pierson who used to call the Bruins games ages ago...he states only the obvious and he is forever getting himself into the middle of sentences with no clear way out. Zolak puts them both to shame with his game observations. It may be borderline heresy but I think it's time for new announcers.
I would be interested in hearing what others think.
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!
Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.
NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98
I think Gil still does a pretty good job. But the time has come for Gino, God bless 'im, to hang up his headphones. I don't think he adds much of anything to the broadcast at this point.
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
There is a thread about Dan Dierdorf and it made me think about Gil and Gino as the Pats announcers. I have been listening to them, off and on, throughout the years, and these last couple of years I have been traveling more for work and therefore have been "forced" to listen to them more in order to catch the Pats. While I respect what they have done in the past, I think its time for them to hang it up. Gil flubs alot of calls, and if he gets around to identifying the Pats receiver who caught the ball before the play is over it's a miracle. Gino reminds me now of John Pierson who used to call the Bruins games ages ago...he states only the obvious and he is forever getting himself into the middle of sentences with no clear way out. Zolak puts them both to shame with his game observations. It may be borderline heresy but I think it's time for new announcers.
I would be interested in hearing what others think.
Gil definitely has slipped on the player identification part, no doubt.
However, I challege you to find a better radio football play by play guy. Maybe Ian Eagle, but I've heard hundreds and Gil beats them all.
Try being locked down here in the DC area and listening to Skins games with the Sonny, Sam and Larry Nursing Home. You'll have a new appreciation for Gil and Gino.
I still turn down the TV though it's clear Gil is guessing as to who made the tackle and, increasingly, who made the catch or carried the ball. Maybe he could wait til someone tells him. Gino steps further into the bog with each additional sentence. But I still think they're good analysts. Zolak has been a great addition. I shudder to think of Tanguay or Gresh doing the game. I just can't take the "Yeah, they scored 40 points, but ...". Pete Brock and Tim Fox used to do a fine job pre and post game. Just want somebody reasonable, and no Glenn Geffner brown-nosers either. How bout Sean McDonough and Jerry Trupiano?
There is a thread about Dan Dierdorf and it made me think about Gil and Gino as the Pats announcers. I have been listening to them, off and on, throughout the years, and these last couple of years I have been traveling more for work and therefore have been "forced" to listen to them more in order to catch the Pats. While I respect what they have done in the past, I think its time for them to hang it up. Gil flubs alot of calls, and if he gets around to identifying the Pats receiver who caught the ball before the play is over it's a miracle. Gino reminds me now of John Pierson who used to call the Bruins games ages ago...he states only the obvious and he is forever getting himself into the middle of sentences with no clear way out. Zolak puts them both to shame with his game observations. It may be borderline heresy but I think it's time for new announcers.
I would be interested in hearing what others think.
I'd murder for Gil and Gino as the TV announcers, my first choice for a murder victim is Phil Simms
__________________
"The secret of steel has always carried with it a mystery, you must learn it's riddle, Conan, you must learn its discipline, for no one in this world can you trust, not men, not women, not beasts...this you can trust"
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Gil definitely has slipped on the player identification part, no doubt.
However, I challege you to find a better radio football play by play guy. Maybe Ian Eagle, but I've heard hundreds and Gil beats them all.
Try being locked down here in the DC area and listening to Skins games with the Sonny, Sam and Larry Nursing Home. You'll have a new appreciation for Gil and Gino.
When Gronk had that long TD reception a couple of games ago, where he ran the ball for 65 yds or whatever, I was listening to Gil yell, "he's at the 45, the 40, the 35", etc" and I'm driving down the road yelling at the radio... "Who is at the 45, who is at the 35...?"
I can't compare radio play by play guys very well because Gil is the only one I have ever listened to for any number of games, but if he's the best out there, at this time, well, that is pretty bad.
They are terrible. I can respect the nostalgia associated with them, but I have only listened to them a few times, mostly pre-season games not on tv. I had to listen to them on Sunday and it was beyond frustrating to hear "and the Patriot player on the catch, good for a first down". How in the world do you not know what Patriot player made the first down? Or the constant "Ridley on the carry"....."no sorry that was Vereen"..."Welker on the punt return"..."no sorry that was Edelmen".
They have great radio voices but are horrible at describing the action. The guy that does the westwood 1 broadcast is very good, can't remember his name. But the guy does TV on Sunday's and then radio on Monday night and he describes every play to a T and doesn't screw up the names of the players....unlike the guys that only have to announce one game a week.
__________________
Hey, Bill you're wasting Brady's prime years......oh wait.... To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
I think they are working Zolak in as Geno's replacement. Zo finally seems to be maturing at color commentary least when seperated from Gresh and the other frat boys at 98.5 and PFW... Gil's pipes are still worth the occasional gaffs. It's obvious some of you have listened to all too few alternate broadcasts, including on local television let alone radio. Those are really scary bad... Even the two clowns who do our preseason games are mindnumbing...