ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW
Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!
If a player signs a contract with a split bonus, part paid this year and
part next year, is the CAP hit based on the total split bonus prorated or
just the part paid this year prorated over contract life?
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!
Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.
NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98
If a player signs a contract with a split bonus, part paid this year and
part next year, is the CAP hit based on the total split bonus prorated or
just the part paid this year prorated over contract life?
AFAIK, any time money is guaranteed, it can be prorated over the remaining years of the contract. As an example: everyone's favorite Slot Machine received a $5.5M signing bonus in '07. That can be prorated at $1.1M/yr over the 5 years. He's also due to receive a $3.5M option bonus this year, which can be prorated at $875K over the remaining four years of the contract.
Similarly, the Pats could guarantee Brady's salary, and prorate 1/3 of it over each of the next three years ('08, '09, '10).
__________________
"Momentum was quickly snatched away by New England, who once again proved that any Patriot, at any moment, can make a play." —Inside the NFL, Packers v. Patriots
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
If a player signs a contract with a split bonus, part paid this year and
part next year, is the CAP hit based on the total split bonus prorated or
just the part paid this year prorated over contract life?
The signing bonus paid this year would be spread over 6 years or the length of the contract (whichever is less) beginning this year. The option bonus is treated the same as signing bonus in advance for future bookeeping (cap) purposes. It would be spread over 6 years or the length of the contract starting in the year it is due. It comes off the cap if in fact it isn't picked up. What the split allows is for a team to not pay all the cash up front, and on a longer deal than 6 years it allows them to prorate bonus money over a longer term (i.e starting the 6 year clock over when the option is due as long as 6 or more years remain on a deal). It also allows for a lower initial cap hit. That can be a big benefit when you extend a player who has dead cap remaining from a prior deal too.
AFAIK, any time money is guaranteed, it can be prorated over the remaining years of the contract. As an example: everyone's favorite Slot Machine received a $5.5M signing bonus in '07. That can be prorated at $1.1M/yr over the 5 years. He's also due to receive a $3.5M option bonus this year, which can be prorated at $875K over the remaining four years of the contract.
Similarly, the Pats could guarantee Brady's salary, and prorate 1/3 of it over each of the next three years ('08, '09, '10).
So if Player X signs a 5 year contract that has 4M Bonus to be paid this
year and a 6M bonus to be paid next year (split bonus) then for the Bonus alone the Team would get hit with what CAP hit assuming the team wants
to pro-rate as many years as possible?
So which of the following is then true?
1) 10M over 5 years? 2M cap hit each year.
2) 4 Mill over 5 years and 6Mill over 4 years.
(Cap this year = .8 M and CAP next year .8 + 2.5 = 3.3M)
3) something else
So if Player X signs a 5 year contract that has 4M Bonus to be paid this
year and a 6M bonus to be paid next year (split bonus) then for the Bonus alone the Team would get hit with what CAP hit assuming the team wants
to pro-rate as many years as possible?
So which of the following is then true?
1) 10M over 5 years? 2M cap hit each year.
2) 4 Mill over 5 years and 6Mill over 4 years.
(Cap this year = .8 M and CAP next year .8 + 2.5 = 3.3M)
3) something else
(2), except there's an error in your math (the cap hit for the remaining four years is $0.8M + $1.5M [= $6M/4], or $2.3M).
__________________
"Momentum was quickly snatched away by New England, who once again proved that any Patriot, at any moment, can make a play." —Inside the NFL, Packers v. Patriots
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
(2), except there's an error in your math (the cap hit for the remaining four years is $0.8M + $1.5M [= $6M/4], or $2.3M).
oops ... right ...
well if this is how it works then that's good.
So if you expect more CAP room next year then a Split Bonus could be
useful. For example .... next year PATs won't have the almost 4M dead
money for Dillon. So they could knock off 4M of a Bonus this year defraying
it until next year when they pick up that CAP room.
If I'm not mistaken, Miquel tries to avoid "interpreting" contracts in his cap spreadsheets. If the future bonus is written as a one-time bonus (like a roster bonus), then Miguel lists it as a one-time non-prorated bonus in the year it will be paid (even though Miguel knows that the bonus will almost certainly be converted to a pro-rated bonus).
For example, he had Stallworth's 2008 bonus listed as a one-time lump sum hit against the 2008 cap even though, had the Pats decided to keep Stallworth, that bonus almost certainly would have been juggled to pro-rate the money over the length of the contract.
If I'm not mistaken, Miquel tries to avoid "interpreting" contracts in his cap spreadsheets. If the future bonus is written as a one-time bonus (like a roster bonus), then Miguel lists it as a one-time non-prorated bonus in the year it will be paid (even though Miguel knows that the bonus will almost certainly be converted to a pro-rated bonus).
For example, he had Stallworth's 2008 bonus listed as a one-time lump sum hit against the 2008 cap even though, had the Pats decided to keep Stallworth, that bonus almost certainly would have been juggled to pro-rate the money over the length of the contract.
"decided to keep Stallworth under the original terms" would be more accurate. The Pats may well want him back, just not at the original $.
__________________
"Momentum was quickly snatched away by New England, who once again proved that any Patriot, at any moment, can make a play." —Inside the NFL, Packers v. Patriots
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.