Eric Moore - Page 4 - New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard
NEWS
|
FORUM
|
PHOTOS
|
VIDEOS
|
FULL STATS DATABASE
|
PODCAST
|
RUMOR MILL
Get Social With PatsFans.com
Early Roster Projection
Ryan's Journey Started Early
POST DRAFT PODCAST

Go Back   New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard > PatsFans.com Forums > PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum
Forgot Password? Join PatsFans.com!
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Arcade Mark Forums Read Chat Room

WELCOME TO OUR FORUM HERE AT PATSFANS.COM!
ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW

Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!

Like Tree11Likes

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-02-2011, 03:56 PM   #31
In the Starting Line-up
 
Oswlek's Avatar
 

Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,389
Default Re: Eric Moore

Quote:
Originally Posted by AzPatsFan View Post
Da Bruinz,

Isn't it nice to get back to fundamental facts? The young Pats were indeed in the middle pack in the league in sacks, while playing a two raw starters at CB, and two raw initial starters at OLB. The young, talented, speed led the league in big play INTs, which is what you want.

Just letting Cunningham and Ninkovitch play as second year starters, the OLBs will be better. Simply getting Wilhite back, more importantly, Bodden back, playing McCourty as a sophomore, and letting first year UDFA CB Arrington, and third year CB Butler play, not to mention a second year for first year Chung, should improve the secondary.

BB is no fool. He sees what he has and what is developing in practice, that we fans haven't seen, yet.
Development, deshmelopment. We need guys who are stars right out of the gate, like Vrabel and Bruschi.
__________________
"They have one objective," said Washington cornerback Shawn Springs. "They whoop people's [backsides]. If you understand that, it answers all your questions. They might not lose [this year]."
Oswlek is offline  
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!

Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account
including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.

NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98

Updated 07/08/11

Help Us Reach Our Goal!

Old 06-02-2011, 04:11 PM   #32
Experienced Starter w/First Big Contract
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 5,104
Default Re: Eric Moore

I would expect a significant improvement if there is a normal amount of time in spring training...
AzPatsFan is online now  
Old 06-02-2011, 04:29 PM   #33
PatsFans.com Retired Jersey Club
 
Deus Irae's Avatar
 

Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 35,447
Default Re: Eric Moore

Quote:
Originally Posted by AzPatsFan View Post
I would expect a significant improvement if there is a normal amount of time in spring training...
27/31/31

Pretty much can't go anywhere but up.
__________________
"The object in life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane."
- Marcus Aurelius
Deus Irae is offline  
Old 06-02-2011, 06:06 PM   #34
Pats, B's, Sox
 
DaBruinz's Avatar
 

Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Sacshe, TX (by way of Salem,NH)
Posts: 22,617
My Mood: Amused
Default Re: Eric Moore

Quote:
Originally Posted by stinkypete View Post
According to football outsiders, they were last in the league in pass defeats.
What the hell is a Pass Defeat? I've heard of Passes Defensed. And that is when a defender knocks down a pass. Many of which should be done by the DBs.
DaBruinz is offline  
Old 06-02-2011, 06:10 PM   #35
In the Starting Line-up
 
randomk1's Avatar
 

Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 3,603
Default Re: Eric Moore

Quote:
Originally Posted by DaBruinz View Post
What the hell is a Pass Defeat? I've heard of Passes Defensed. And that is when a defender knocks down a pass. Many of which should be done by the DBs.
From FO:

Remember that Pass Defeats come in four different flavors:
turnovers
sacks
tackles behind the line on short passes
tackles or passes defensed that prevent a third-down conversion

GB is ranked 1st by them.
__________________
Three out of Four. Back-to-back.
randomk1 is offline  
Old 06-02-2011, 07:08 PM   #36
Pats, B's, Sox
 
DaBruinz's Avatar
 

Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Sacshe, TX (by way of Salem,NH)
Posts: 22,617
My Mood: Amused
Default Re: Eric Moore

Quote:
Originally Posted by E Belichick Unum View Post
No, it really is pathetic. Having a bunch of sacks, being in the middle of the pack, more sacks after Nov, blah, blah, blah. This defense is based off of pressure coming from the edge, without it the defense gets exposed. The interior line is made up of big, heavy guys. They may get some sacks, but the cannot chase the QB down and they cannot dictate the game.

Without a pass rusher applying outside pressure the DBs get exposed, the linebackers have to be used as pass defenders and get run on in passing situations and we live with people like TBC and Ninkovich. Bith of them are second stringers, at best.

The reason why people are so happy with Eric Moore is because everybody else sucks. It is the off season, when grasping at straws is what happens when the team doesn't draft a pass rusher.
Well, there is your first mistake. This defense is NOT based off of pressure coming from the edge. This defense is based on being able to bring pressure from any of the 4 LB positions. That's what made it so good in 2003 and 2004. They have been improving that, slowly but surely. The problem last year was that, after Ty Warren went down, only WILFORK was consistently able to draw double and triple teams. Unfortunately, this left o-line and TEs to pick up the rushing LB.

It's plainly clear to me that you do not understand how the front 7 are supposed to function. You seem to be thinking of them in terms of a 4-3 system and they aren't.
DaBruinz is offline  
Old 06-02-2011, 07:09 PM   #37
Pats, B's, Sox
 
DaBruinz's Avatar
 

Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Sacshe, TX (by way of Salem,NH)
Posts: 22,617
My Mood: Amused
Default Re: Eric Moore

Quote:
Originally Posted by randomk1 View Post
From FO:

Remember that Pass Defeats come in four different flavors:
turnovers
sacks
tackles behind the line on short passes
tackles or passes defensed that prevent a third-down conversion

GB is ranked 1st by them.
So it's a made up stat that has no bearing on anything. I appreciate the info.
DaBruinz is offline  
Old 06-02-2011, 07:15 PM   #38
Pats, B's, Sox
 
DaBruinz's Avatar
 

Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Sacshe, TX (by way of Salem,NH)
Posts: 22,617
My Mood: Amused
Default Re: Eric Moore

Stats without context are meaningless. And no, those stats don't have context.

Not to mention that Sacks are not the be all end all to whether or not a pass rush is effective.
DaBruinz is offline  
Old 06-02-2011, 08:15 PM   #39
Practice Squad
 

Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 457
My Mood: Brooding
Default Re: Eric Moore

Quote:
Originally Posted by DaBruinz View Post
Well, there is your first mistake. This defense is NOT based off of pressure coming from the edge. This defense is based on being able to bring pressure from any of the 4 LB positions. That's what made it so good in 2003 and 2004. They have been improving that, slowly but surely. The problem last year was that, after Ty Warren went down, only WILFORK was consistently able to draw double and triple teams. Unfortunately, this left o-line and TEs to pick up the rushing LB.

It's plainly clear to me that you do not understand how the front 7 are supposed to function. You seem to be thinking of them in terms of a 4-3 system and they aren't.
Let me repost this. The Patriots do not blitz their inside linebackers very often, they either fill the gaps or drop back in coverage. That leaves the OLBs to apply pressure.

Belichick's defense is based off of a stud nose tackle. That is where it starts, withoput one it doesn't work. The nose is responsible for forcing a double team, clogging up the middle, forcing the running back to go wide. That leaves the two ends to force the offensive line into the backfield and not allowing the running back to get around the edge. The middle libebackers are responsible for filling the holes that are created when the ends push the offensive line into the backfield. That is the reason why the ILB in the Belichick system is so active, and why Mayo got so many tackles last year. That leaves the two outside linebackers to aply pressure on the passer and applying back side pressure on the running back who has been forced wide. Sometimes they run stunts, but the Pats don't run a lot of them. Sometimes they blitz inside guys, or a DB, but the OLB is responsible for pass rush in passing situations and storming the backfield on running plays. If there is no pressure from the edge then you are relying on your ends for that pressure, and football is stacked against that happening. Tackles and guards are way too good in this league to get beaten consistently, especially by defensive ends in a 3/4 defense. You need that quick powerful guy coming off of the edge for the defense to really work well.

That is why Belichick has had such a hard time replacing McGinnist, finding that 6'6", 275 Lb OLB who can run a 4.5 is almost impossible drafting where the Pats usually draft and that is why I am so upset that the Pats didn't get their guy this year. They had the draft picks and the trading partners to go get one, and they took an offensive lineman who is a project instead.
E Belichick Unum is offline  
Old 06-02-2011, 08:24 PM   #40
PatsFans.com Supporter
 
Sciz's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Iowa
Posts: 5,913
My Mood: Yeehaw
Default Re: Eric Moore

Quote:
Originally Posted by E Belichick Unum View Post
That is why Belichick has had such a hard time replacing McGinnist, finding that 6'6", 275 Lb OLB who can run a 4.5 is almost impossible drafting where the Pats usually draft and that is why I am so upset that the Pats didn't get their guy this year. They had the draft picks and the trading partners to go get one, and they took an offensive lineman who is a project instead.
The best candidate went at #7. That's 17+33 trade range. The other one supposedly had a medical red flag on the Pats' board but still went at #14. There weren't any other good OLB candidates.
DaBruinz likes this.
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fake Nate Ebner
No big deal...only took me 3 defensive plays to be drafted before Tom Brady
Sciz is offline  
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Sponsored Links



Thread Tools
Display Modes


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Eric Moore-Worthy? alphilip77 PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum 10 04-17-2011 12:56 PM
Eric Moore Appreciation Thread 37Harrison PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum 29 01-03-2011 10:08 PM
Eric Moore Elijah PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum 49 12-13-2010 10:43 PM



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:41 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2

© Copyright 2000-2012. PatsFans.com Is a Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties.
The opinions posted in this forum do not necessarily reflect the opinions of our staff at PatsFans.com or USA Today.
We are not affiliated with the New England Patriots™ or the NFL™. The Photo Used In the header was taken by Ian Logue.

This site is owned and operated by I&K Internet Design Enterprises, LLC


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563