ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW
Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!
Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.
NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98
I think it's part of the whole Schadenfreude concept, i.e. taking pleasure in other people's pain/suffering/failure.
Many fans who don't ally themselves with the Patriots obviously want to see us lose. Not many people can name who the 72Dolphins beat in the superbowl, but, if we ought to lose (football Gods forbid), the Giants would be remembered like the Dolphins are remembered for adding a 1 to the loss column for the 85 bears.
Overall, I like Chuck Klosterman. He's like a less-annoying Bill Simmons. A lot of people in the media might seem to have it out for the Patriots, but he doesn't make me upset in his rooting against the Patriots, because for a fan of another team, it could very well be more interesting to see the Patriots lose.
__________________ There is an old saying about the strength of the wolf is the pack, and I think there is a lot of truth to that. On a football team, it's not the strength of the individual players, but it is the strength of the unit and how they all function together.” --William S. Belichick
I think it's part of the whole Schadenfreude concept, i.e. taking pleasure in other people's pain/suffering/failure.
Many fans who don't ally themselves with the Patriots obviously want to see us lose. Not many people can name who the 72Dolphins beat in the superbowl, but, if we ought to lose (football Gods forbid), the Giants would be remembered like the Dolphins are remembered for adding a 1 to the loss column for the 85 bears.
Overall, I like Chuck Klosterman. He's like a less-annoying Bill Simmons. A lot of people in the media might seem to have it out for the Patriots, but he doesn't make me upset in his rooting against the Patriots, because for a fan of another team, it could very well be more interesting to see the Patriots lose.
It was a good article, pretty well written. I think he was pointing out the fact that life is great because of imperfection and (except for us Pats fans) perfection would be boring.
I really enjoy Klosterman's articles & more importantly his books. They're great. He's a better writer about basketball than about football though.
Great point about no-one remembers who the 72 Dolphins beat in the SB. That's a lot of what this covers.
It's a bit more subtle than what's up front. Unsure why this is the front page ESPN article. Apparently nothing is happening today. (And everyone in America hates tennis, so....)
Imperfection is what makes others seem more human. That being said, we've shown enough imperfection for me already in a few quarters... so let's just play 4 more good quarters and end the season on a W.
It was a good article, pretty well written. I think he was pointing out the fact that life is great because of imperfection and (except for us Pats fans) perfection would be boring.
Exactly what will our expectations be in the years following a perfect season. If you think things are bad now imagine when we lose our first game.
Another thing he was pointing out, which was quite obvious, is that if we lose this game the 2007 New England Patriots will be remembered more than if were to win this game.
Besides the conclusion, it actually makes a lot of sense. The pursuit of perfection is almost by definition self-defeating. We are generally measured by development and growth, not by how brutally efficient we carry out our tasks (unless you are a machine or assassin). We are remembered for seizing the moment, not for controlling events and bending them to your will. We are revered for being able to briefly rise above limitations and become more than was thought possible, not for coldly exploiting the limitations of others.
Perfection is not a "human" concept, which makes it at the same time both interesting and distasteful.
That being said, the Patriots have gotten to 18-0 not by being a perfect team...but by being a great team. They grow and get better. They have seized the moments when they arrive. And they have risen above their own limitations to become more as a unit than they ever could be individually.
On February 3rd at about 10pm, regardless of the outcome, the Patriots will not be perfect. They will be one more step along a path of achieving goals and setting new ones. Along the way, the rest of the league will set their sights higher. "Perfection" today would really just be the baseline for tomorrow.
Rooting for the Giants to stop "perfection" is like cheering for mediocrity because it makes you feel more comfortable. Not only is that misguided, but it is sad. Root for the Giants to take the next step and achieve what everyone told them is beyond their reach. I'll do the same for my imperfect, but still lovable, Pats.
Exactly what will our expectations be in the years following a perfect season. If you think things are bad now imagine when we lose our first game.
Another thing he was pointing out, which was quite obvious, is that if we lose this game the 2007 New England Patriots will be remembered more than if were to win this game.
I don't know if I agree with the part about the Pats being remembered more or less because there are some real superstars on the team, but an upset in this game would be, at this point a larger story, and perhaps a more exciting story than the Pats completing the perfect season. I also think there is an element of Jared Leto's character getting pulverized by Edward Norton in Fight Club.
Exactly what will our expectations be in the years following a perfect season. If you think things are bad now imagine when we lose our first game.
Another thing he was pointing out, which was quite obvious, is that if we lose this game the 2007 New England Patriots will be remembered more than if were to win this game.