ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW
Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!
....or in other words I just got fed up with all the NY Giants talk I've been hearing today. Let me take it step by step using the "blueprint" that all these idiot talking heads keep bringing up....Part 1
1. "Run the ball and keep Brady on the bench"
Well THAT is not going to happen any time soon. Hasn't anyone noticed that the Pats' run defense has been pretty good in the last month. In week 17 Brandon Jacobs was held to 67 yds. The 2nd best rushing attack in the league managed only 80 yd as a COMBINED group (Taylor, Jones-Drew, Garrad), and finally 100 vs SD - with 28 of those yds coming against an end of the half draw play against a maximum pass defense.
BOTTOM LINE - If the Giants think that somehow THEIR rushing attack is better than the Jags and SD, they are very much mistaken. I can see them getting as much as 100 yds, but no more....and that isn't going to keep Brady et all on the bench.
2. Put Brady on the ground - WHAT- Osi and Strahan are 2 great pass rushers, but the fact is that threw for over 300 yds in that game WITHOUT Neal, Kazcur, and KBrady....IN Giants Stadium....ON a cold windy day. Oh, I'm sure they will sack him a couple of times, and hit him a few more....BUT for at LEAST 25 of the 30 odd times that Brady will drop back in the Superbowl, he will have ALL THE TIME he needs to gash the Giants. And that will be against a Giant secondary that will SIGNIFICANTLY inferior to EITHER of the 2 teams the Pats have played thus far. Please give me a legitimate reason why things will change that drasically that what I stated won't happen.
BOTTOM LINE: Brady will have time, and the Giants secondary isn't built to stop them.
THeres is so much more, But I have to run so we can start with these two items....AND there are more to come.
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!
Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.
NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98
You're exactly right, of course, and people with knowledge of football couldn't agree with you more. But don't expect the mainstream media (or, god forbid, talk radio callers) to favor logic over the sensational.
Your cogent analysis has no place on the national stage, sir, now please excuse me while I study 14 hours of TMZ footage of Brady's foot.
....or in other words I just got fed up with all the NY Giants talk I've been hearing today. Let me take it step by step using the "blueprint" that all these idiot talking heads keep bringing up....Part 1
1. "Run the ball and keep Brady on the bench"
I don't think playing keepaway will work when we can score at will barring bad weather or turnovers. The only way we can lose, IMO, is to be outscored which is why the Colts scared the crap out of me.
edit - obviously by "outscored" I meant in a scoring fest like 37-34, clearly any outscoring would beat us
I'm not convinced that the Pats will be able to focus on stopping the run between the 20s as much as they did with Jax and SD. A gimpy Rivers throwing to a gimpy gates is not the concern that LdT and Turner were. Similarly Garrard is a great QB but he's not proven he can really kill you with his arm week in and week out, hence Taylor and MJD drew a lot more attention from our safeties.
Ultimately, though, the Patriots are just as capable, if not moreso, of playing ball-control. The idea that just because they've shown they can score big and often means they can't manage a long, clock-killing drive too is pretty clearly not the case.
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Ultimately, though, the Patriots are just as capable, if not moreso, of playing ball-control. The idea that just because they've shown they can score big and often means they can't manage a long, clock-killing drive too is pretty clearly not the case.
Exactly. I'm pretty sure the Pats put the "high flying finesse offense" thing to bed against San Diego. On a day when the passing attack never really got much rhythm, Maroney was able to run all over them in the 2nd half (as he was against the Jags), concluding with a long sustained drive which ran out the clock.
The Pats have made it pretty clear that no matter what style of game ends up being played, they're going to find a way to win in that manner.
Come on guys, this isn’t our first rodeo, this has been the trend since the Ravens game, and in all the playoff games so far. Monday after the WC game, Jacksonville is going to win, they can do a, b, and c. Come Friday everyone but a few minor people trying to pick a name for themselves pick the Pats... Pats go on to do what they do, win, and the game never really in question…
Its going to be the same way, a week and a half of talking heads saying why the Giants can win, to hype the game, then come Friday everyone picks the Pats come super bowl Sunday the Pats do what they do, kill the giants…