02-27-2011, 02:19 PM
|
#10
|
|
Experienced Starter w/First Big Contract
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Central MA by way of the great state of New Hampshire
Posts: 7,378
|
Re: DeSean Jackson
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlueString94
No no no no no no no no no no no! NO NO NO NO! NO! NO!
This offence has moved on from the field-stretcher, and we will not succeed with one. Those 50 touchdown's in 2007? Many were due to Randy Moss's unreal catching ability. DeSean doesn't really have that, he's just really fast.
Still with our two tight end, Branch/Welker recieving core. we already have tons of depth there. We're a building team. No need to go on a signing spree of star players in their prime like we did in 2007.
|
That logic doesn't make sense to me. The 2007 team went 18-1 and by all accounts lost the SB because of injuries (Neal, Faulk), bad defense with 2:30 to play and succumbed to one of the top 5 pass rushing teams in Super Bowl history that came in hotter than hot. Your rationale states that your don't want a deep threat because of that??
Rule #1 in the NFL. If you stay still, your opponents will catch up with you.
__________________
“I'm not really concerned about the other 31 teams,” - Bill Belichick
"If a player has talent and doesn't succeed, that means that they either don't want to be successful or I have failed as a coach." - Bill Belichick
Last edited by robertweathers; 02-27-2011 at 02:20 PM..
|
|
|