Worst Case Scenario? - Page 2 - New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard
NEWS
|
FORUM
|
PHOTOS
|
VIDEOS
|
FULL STATS DATABASE
|
PODCAST
|
RUMOR MILL
Get Social With PatsFans.com
Early Roster Projection
Ryan's Journey Started Early
POST DRAFT PODCAST

Go Back   New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard > PatsFans.com Forums > PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum
Forgot Password? Join PatsFans.com!
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Arcade Mark Forums Read Chat Room

WELCOME TO OUR FORUM HERE AT PATSFANS.COM!
ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW

Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-18-2007, 11:11 AM   #11
All Pro Poster
 
upstater1's Avatar
 

Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 11,794
Default Re: Worst Case Scenario?

Quote:
Originally Posted by roman_maroney View Post
the worst case scenario is if anything valid comes out of these reports stating that they are alleged to have had a D lineman mic'd up with a microphone that could listen to the opponents huddle in real-time.

While I am pretty sure that is just some piling on, and nothing will come out of it because it wasnt being done... I don't even want to think of the repercussions for something that damning. That goes way beyond gamesmanship, advanced scouting, and competitive edge, and would be the worst case scenario.

Not gonna happen, though. These new allegations come from the 0-2 Jets wanting a forfeit, and now doing anything they can to get one after the commish determined and stated clearly "after examining the FACTS" that the incident had "no impact on the outcome of the Jets game"
Why didn't the NFL look into this last year when this is exactly what the Dolphins did?

I bet you anything that miking d-lineman is more widespread than videotaping signals.
upstater1 is online now   Reply With Quote
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!

Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account
including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.

NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98

Updated 07/08/11

Help Us Reach Our Goal!

Old 09-18-2007, 11:15 AM   #12
B.O. = Fugazi
 
BelichickFan's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 30,552
Send a message via AIM to BelichickFan
Default Re: Worst Case Scenario?

Quote:
Originally Posted by upstater1 View Post
Why didn't the NFL look into this last year when this is exactly what the Dolphins did?
There seems to be a little uncertainty whether Saban got the audibles through players mics or from buying the network audio iso tape (most say the latter but Mort said the former in a thread here somewhere). Either way the end result is the same.
BelichickFan is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 09-18-2007, 11:20 AM   #13
Veteran Starter w/Big Long Term Deal
 

Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 9,331
My Mood: Bored
Default Re: Worst Case Scenario?

BB has as much as admitted that he did this before because of his "misinterpretation." So, if that's what Goodell is looking for, then he's up the proverbial creek. However, I don't think that's the case and that he would be penalized again for this "crime." Even Peter King, who is no friend of BB's in this regard, said he thinks it's unlikely that any further penalties will result from this. I think they're looking for other stuff, whatever that might be.
__________________
It is what it is. It wasn't what it wasn't.
PatsFanSince74 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 09-18-2007, 11:25 AM   #14
Role Player
 

Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: STILL Pursuing Perfection
Posts: 1,776
Default Re: Worst Case Scenario?

Dumpster-diving
yields more and better documentation
than what one party turns over to the other
in legal discovery.

Relax, boys n girls.
psychoPat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-18-2007, 11:25 AM   #15
2nd Team Getting Their First Start
 
Halifax_Pats_Fan's Avatar
 

Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Halifax, NS
Posts: 1,772
My Mood: Sleepy
Send a message via MSN to Halifax_Pats_Fan
Default Re: Worst Case Scenario?

worst case senario....the Patriots would have to play in the CFL for a year...

NNNNNNOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
Halifax_Pats_Fan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-18-2007, 11:32 AM   #16
Second Team and Threatening Starter's Job
 

Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,341
Default Re: Worst Case Scenario?

The team's issue is if the satellite launched by Krafty Enterprises and shared with Orbital is discovered filming all opponents' practices. This is something the team is definitely concerned about and is doing everything they can to correct this situation by positioning it so the Orbital brand is plainly visible.

The Elvis with a camera brand is to be rotated and positioned away from the earth using the onboard thrusters. It's felt that it won't be discovered until well beyond the completion of BB's contract term. At that time, it's felt that the Patriots will be so good, that they'll be required to announce their plays in advance to enable the opponents a slim chance in stopping them. This will be referred to as the next step in NFL parity and embraced by media and fans alike.
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
The Dude Abides . . . .
ClevTrev is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-18-2007, 11:42 AM   #17
Veteran Starter w/Big Long Term Deal
 
Patriot_in_NY's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Albuquerque, NM
Posts: 8,333
My Mood: Blah
Default Re: Worst Case Scenario?

Ummmm, I think some people are missing the point. Remember what Bills defense likely was. "I've been doing it for years as I like to catalog coaches tendencies and what not for my library. I did so because of you're lame ass, contradictory by-laws and rules, I thought as long as I wasn't using it for in game use, I was okay (despite the memo you sent telling me not too ). "

When Goodell said "Nice try, Bill, but that not gonna fly. You know you can't do that."

The logical next step is to say ---- "Okay Bill, since we now both know all the tapes were obtained in violation of the rules, you know I can't let you just keep them. You gonna have to give them up so you don't use them in the future to gain some competitive edge."

Bill: "Okay, I understand {note to self: makes copies, send originals}.

The rhetoric about continued investigation, blaa, blaa blaa is done....... My guess is they watch about 4 tapes and say, this is boring crap and don't even bother. A few weeks later there will be a statement saying the No evidence of further wrongdoing.

I think the leak video tape will have that a calming effect. NO ONE will want that investigation to get off the ground. Imagine the ramifications of being busted for that.

The damage left in its wake will remain, but I think the eye of the storm has moved off shore now.

Last edited by Patriot_in_NY; 09-18-2007 at 12:53 PM..
Patriot_in_NY is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-18-2007, 12:23 PM   #18
Addicted to the light
 
Bella*chick's Avatar
 

Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: City of Blinding Lights
Posts: 7,186
My Mood: Blah
Default Re: Worst Case Scenario?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Patriot_in_NY View Post
Ummmm, I think some people are missing the point. Remember what Bills defense likely was. "I've been doing it for years as I like to catalog coaches tendencies and what not for my library. I did so because of you're lame ass, contradictory by-laws and rules, I thought as long as I wasn't using it for in game use, I was okay (despite the memo you sent telling me not too ). "

When Goodell said "Nice try, Bill, but that not gonna fly. You know you can't do that."

The logical next step is to say ---- "Okay Bill, since we now both know all the tapes were obtained in violation of the rules, you know I can't let you just keep them. You gonna have to give them up so you don't use them in the future to gain some competitive edge."

Bill: "Okay, I understand {note to self: makes copies, send originals}.

The rhetoric about continued investigation, blaa, blaa blaa is done....... My guess is they watch about 4 tapes and say, this is boring crap and don't even bother. A few weeks later there will be a statement saying the No evidence of further wrongdoing.

I think the leak video tap will that that effect. NO ONE will want that investigation to get off the ground. Imagine the ramifications of being busted for that.

The damage left in its wake will remain, but I think the eye of the storm has moved off shore now.
Again, I think this is 100% correct. Except the copies thing...they are specifically saying if they ever find out we made copies, we'll be dead meat.

And how could they find out? Another rat turncoat like Mangini.

Other than that I think this correct.

I don't think they are looking to widen the penalty. But then, with this story nothing would surprise me any more.

I think the longer this stupidity goes on, the more everyone just wants to see it go away.
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Bella*chick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-18-2007, 12:48 PM   #19
Second Team and Threatening Starter's Job
 

Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,341
Default Re: Worst Case Scenario?

Consider that Goodell's ultimate goal aside from maintaining the game's credibility is to put an end to this mindless speculation and false accusations. How does he do that?

He reviews all of the Patriots' video tape and makes the following statement: "After a thorough review of the New England Patriots' video tapes and taping procedures, I've found no further violations by the team. The penalty stands and the matter is closed with regards to the team found in violation. Vigilant observation and comprehensive league-wide measures are now in place to prevent this from happening in the future, as we are taking our efforts to preserve the ethical standards of the game very seriously. We are prepared to revisit this issue should we find any other team not complying with this rule."

This will effectively stop the media circus once and for all except for those who have an axe to grind. After awhile, that grinding will be transferred to some other issue.
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
The Dude Abides . . . .
ClevTrev is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-18-2007, 12:50 PM   #20
Veteran Starter w/Big Long Term Deal
 
Patriot_in_NY's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Albuquerque, NM
Posts: 8,333
My Mood: Blah
Default Re: Worst Case Scenario?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bella*chick View Post
Again, I think this is 100% correct. Except the copies thing...they are specifically saying if they ever find out we made copies, we'll be dead meat.

And how could they find out? Another rat turncoat like Mangini.

Other than that I think this correct.

I don't think they are looking to widen the penalty. But then, with this story nothing would surprise me any more.

I think the longer this stupidity goes on, the more everyone just wants to see it go away.
I was actually kidding there. I'm quite sure Goodell {and Kraft} worked the lanquage out exactly for that specific reason. Give us the tapes and it's over.
__________________
Patroit_in_NY is now Patriot_in_ABQ
Patriot_in_NY is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Sponsored Links



Thread Tools
Display Modes


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:39 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2

© Copyright 2000-2012. PatsFans.com Is a Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties.
The opinions posted in this forum do not necessarily reflect the opinions of our staff at PatsFans.com or USA Today.
We are not affiliated with the New England Patriots™ or the NFL™. The Photo Used In the header was taken by Ian Logue.

This site is owned and operated by I&K Internet Design Enterprises, LLC